sustainability-scoring

Name: sustainability-scoring
Author: Abhinavbwj

118stars35forks

How to install sustainability-scoring?

abhinavbwj/urban-design-skills-claude/sustainability-scoring

$npx -y skills add Abhinavbwj/Urban-Design-Skills-Claude --skill sustainability-scoring

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Score urban designs against LEED-ND, BREEAM Communities, WELL Community Standard, Green Star Communities, CASBEE Urban Development, and Estidama Pearl Community Rating System. Generates detailed scoring reports with credit-by-credit analysis, achievability assessment, and optimiz

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# Sustainability Scoring Skill
2
3	This skill provides comprehensive sustainability certification scoring for urban designs and masterplans. It covers the six major neighborhood/community-scale rating systems used globally: LEED-ND (US), BREEAM Communities (UK/Europe), WELL Community Standard (global, health-focused), Green Star Communities (Australia/NZ), CASBEE Urban Development (Japan), and Estidama Pearl Community Rating System (Middle East). The skill generates credit-by-credit scoring analyses, identifies optimization opportunities, and produces professional scorecard reports.
4
5	---
6
7	## 1. Certification System Selector
8
9	Use the following decision tree to select the appropriate certification system(s) for a given project. Geography is the primary driver, but project focus and client preference may override.
10
11	### Decision Tree
12
13	```
14	START
15	\|
16	\|--> Where is the project located?
17	\| \|
18	\| \|--> North America (US, Canada) --> LEED-ND v4.1
19	\| \| \|--> Also health-focused? --> Add WELL Community Standard
20	\| \|
21	\| \|--> United Kingdom --> BREEAM Communities
22	\| \| \|--> Also health-focused? --> Add WELL Community Standard
23	\| \|
24	\| \|--> Europe (non-UK) --> BREEAM Communities (or local adaptation)
25	\| \| \|--> Also health-focused? --> Add WELL Community Standard
26	\| \|
27	\| \|--> Australia or New Zealand --> Green Star Communities
28	\| \| \|--> Also health-focused? --> Add WELL Community Standard
29	\| \|
30	\| \|--> Japan --> CASBEE for Urban Development
31	\| \|
32	\| \|--> Middle East (esp. Abu Dhabi, UAE) --> Estidama Pearl Community
33	\| \| \|--> Abu Dhabi specifically? --> Estidama Pearl is MANDATORY
34	\| \|
35	\| \|--> Other regions --> LEED-ND (most globally recognized)
36	\| \|--> Or BREEAM International New Construction (building scale)
37	\|
38	\|--> Does the client have a specific certification preference?
39	\| \|--> Yes --> Use client's preferred system
40	\| \|--> No --> Use geography-based recommendation above
41	\|
42	\|--> Does the project seek multiple certifications?
43	\|--> Yes --> Use Cross-Certification Comparison Matrix (Section 3) to
44	\| identify strategies that earn credits across multiple systems
45	\|--> No --> Focus on single system for maximum point optimization
46	```
47
48	### System Overview Comparison
49
50	\| System \| Origin \| Scale \| Points/Score \| Certification Levels \| Typical Cost \| Timeline \|
51	\|--------\|--------\|-------\|-------------\|---------------------\|-------------\|----------\|
52	\| LEED-ND v4.1 \| USA (USGBC) \| Neighborhood (multiple buildings + infrastructure) \| 110 points \| Certified (40), Silver (50), Gold (60), Platinum (80) \| $30,000-100,000+ \| 12-36 months \|
53	\| BREEAM Communities \| UK (BRE) \| Community / masterplan \| % weighted score \| Pass (30%), Good (45%), Very Good (55%), Excellent (70%), Outstanding (85%) \| $25,000-80,000 \| 12-24 months \|
54	\| WELL Community \| USA (IWBI) \| Community (public realm + buildings) \| Points per concept \| WELL Community (pass/fail prerequisites + optimization points) \| $30,000-80,000 \| 12-24 months \|
55	\| Green Star Communities \| Australia (GBCA) \| Community / precinct \| 100+ points weighted \| 1 Star to 6 Stars (World Leadership) \| AUD 40,000-120,000 \| 12-24 months \|
56	\| CASBEE Urban Dev. \| Japan (JSBC) \| Urban development area \| BEE score (ratio) \| C, B-, B+, A, S (Superior) \| Varies \| 6-18 months \|
57	\| Estidama Pearl \| Abu Dhabi (UPC) \| Community \| Credit points \| 1 Pearl to 5 Pearls \| Included in permitting \| Ongoing \|
58
59	---
60
61	## 2. LEED-ND v4.1 Quick Scoring
62
63	LEED for Neighborhood Development (LEED-ND) v4.1 is the most widely used neighborhood-scale sustainability rating system. It evaluates the location, design, and construction of new or redeveloped neighborhoods.
64
65	### Prerequisites (Mandatory -- all must be met)
66
67	\| Category \| Prerequisite \| Key Requirement \|
68	\|----------\|-------------\|-----------------\|
69	\| SLL \| Smart Location \| Site must not be on prime farmland, floodplain (100-yr), habitat for listed species, public parkland, or within setback of water body. Must be on previously developed land OR adjacent to existing development on at least 75% of boundary \|
70	\| SLL \| Imperiled Species and Ecological Communities \| Assessment of site for listed species; if present, habitat conservation plan required \|
71	\| SLL \| Wetland and Water Body

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type

sustainability-scoring

118stars35forks

View on GitHub

How to install sustainability-scoring?

abhinavbwj/urban-design-skills-claude/sustainability-scoring

$npx -y skills add Abhinavbwj/Urban-Design-Skills-Claude --skill sustainability-scoring

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# Sustainability Scoring Skill
2
3	This skill provides comprehensive sustainability certification scoring for urban designs and masterplans. It covers the six major neighborhood/community-scale rating systems used globally: LEED-ND (US), BREEAM Communities (UK/Europe), WELL Community Standard (global, health-focused), Green Star Communities (Australia/NZ), CASBEE Urban Development (Japan), and Estidama Pearl Community Rating System (Middle East). The skill generates credit-by-credit scoring analyses, identifies optimization opportunities, and produces professional scorecard reports.
4
5	---
6
7	## 1. Certification System Selector
8
9	Use the following decision tree to select the appropriate certification system(s) for a given project. Geography is the primary driver, but project focus and client preference may override.
10
11	### Decision Tree
12
13	```
14	START
15	\|
16	\|--> Where is the project located?
17	\| \|
18	\| \|--> North America (US, Canada) --> LEED-ND v4.1
19	\| \| \|--> Also health-focused? --> Add WELL Community Standard
20	\| \|
21	\| \|--> United Kingdom --> BREEAM Communities
22	\| \| \|--> Also health-focused? --> Add WELL Community Standard
23	\| \|
24	\| \|--> Europe (non-UK) --> BREEAM Communities (or local adaptation)
25	\| \| \|--> Also health-focused? --> Add WELL Community Standard
26	\| \|
27	\| \|--> Australia or New Zealand --> Green Star Communities
28	\| \| \|--> Also health-focused? --> Add WELL Community Standard
29	\| \|
30	\| \|--> Japan --> CASBEE for Urban Development
31	\| \|
32	\| \|--> Middle East (esp. Abu Dhabi, UAE) --> Estidama Pearl Community
33	\| \| \|--> Abu Dhabi specifically? --> Estidama Pearl is MANDATORY
34	\| \|
35	\| \|--> Other regions --> LEED-ND (most globally recognized)
36	\| \|--> Or BREEAM International New Construction (building scale)
37	\|
38	\|--> Does the client have a specific certification preference?
39	\| \|--> Yes --> Use client's preferred system
40	\| \|--> No --> Use geography-based recommendation above
41	\|
42	\|--> Does the project seek multiple certifications?
43	\|--> Yes --> Use Cross-Certification Comparison Matrix (Section 3) to
44	\| identify strategies that earn credits across multiple systems
45	\|--> No --> Focus on single system for maximum point optimization
46	```
47
48	### System Overview Comparison
49
50	\| System \| Origin \| Scale \| Points/Score \| Certification Levels \| Typical Cost \| Timeline \|
51	\|--------\|--------\|-------\|-------------\|---------------------\|-------------\|----------\|
52	\| LEED-ND v4.1 \| USA (USGBC) \| Neighborhood (multiple buildings + infrastructure) \| 110 points \| Certified (40), Silver (50), Gold (60), Platinum (80) \| $30,000-100,000+ \| 12-36 months \|
53	\| BREEAM Communities \| UK (BRE) \| Community / masterplan \| % weighted score \| Pass (30%), Good (45%), Very Good (55%), Excellent (70%), Outstanding (85%) \| $25,000-80,000 \| 12-24 months \|
54	\| WELL Community \| USA (IWBI) \| Community (public realm + buildings) \| Points per concept \| WELL Community (pass/fail prerequisites + optimization points) \| $30,000-80,000 \| 12-24 months \|
55	\| Green Star Communities \| Australia (GBCA) \| Community / precinct \| 100+ points weighted \| 1 Star to 6 Stars (World Leadership) \| AUD 40,000-120,000 \| 12-24 months \|
56	\| CASBEE Urban Dev. \| Japan (JSBC) \| Urban development area \| BEE score (ratio) \| C, B-, B+, A, S (Superior) \| Varies \| 6-18 months \|
57	\| Estidama Pearl \| Abu Dhabi (UPC) \| Community \| Credit points \| 1 Pearl to 5 Pearls \| Included in permitting \| Ongoing \|
58
59	---
60
61	## 2. LEED-ND v4.1 Quick Scoring
62
63	LEED for Neighborhood Development (LEED-ND) v4.1 is the most widely used neighborhood-scale sustainability rating system. It evaluates the location, design, and construction of new or redeveloped neighborhoods.
64
65	### Prerequisites (Mandatory -- all must be met)
66
67	\| Category \| Prerequisite \| Key Requirement \|
68	\|----------\|-------------\|-----------------\|
69	\| SLL \| Smart Location \| Site must not be on prime farmland, floodplain (100-yr), habitat for listed species, public parkland, or within setback of water body. Must be on previously developed land OR adjacent to existing development on at least 75% of boundary \|
70	\| SLL \| Imperiled Species and Ecological Communities \| Assessment of site for listed species; if present, habitat conservation plan required \|
71	\| SLL \| Wetland and Water Body

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type