seo-content

Name: seo-content
Author: AgriciDaniel

4.0kinstalls1.8kforks

How to install seo-content?

agricidaniel/claude-seo/seo-content

$npx -y skills add AgriciDaniel/claude-seo --skill seo-content

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Content quality and E-E-A-T analysis with AI citation readiness assessment. Use when user says "content quality", "E-E-A-T", "content analysis", "readability check", "thin content", or "content audit".

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# Content Quality & E-E-A-T Analysis
2
3	## Google's "Who / How / Why" Test (canonical heuristic)
4
5	Before scoring E-E-A-T sub-factors, every page audit should pass Google's
6	own three-question heuristic from the helpful-content guide:
7
8	\| Question \| What to look for \|
9	\|---\|---\|
10	\| Who created it? \| Visible byline, author bio page, professional credentials. Required where readers expect it; non-negotiable for YMYL. \|
11	\| How was it created? \| Process disclosure where readers would reasonably ask, especially for AI-assisted content. Original research / first-hand evidence / lived experience. \|
12	\| Why does it exist? \| "To help people" rather than "to attract search clicks." Watch for niche entry without expertise, content churn for freshness signals, content written to a word-count target. \|
13
14	Primary source:
15	https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/creating-helpful-content
16
17	When all three answers are weak, the page is at risk under the core ranking
18	system's helpfulness signals (formerly the standalone Helpful Content System,
19	merged into core during the March 2024 update).
20
21	## E-E-A-T Framework (updated Sept 2025 QRG)
22
23	Read `skills/seo/references/eeat-framework.md` for full criteria.
24
25	### Experience (first-hand signals)
26	- Original research, case studies, before/after results
27	- Personal anecdotes, process documentation
28	- Unique data, proprietary insights
29	- Photos/videos from direct experience
30
31	### Expertise
32	- Author credentials, certifications, bio
33	- Professional background relevant to topic
34	- Technical depth appropriate for audience
35	- Accurate, well-sourced claims
36
37	### Authoritativeness
38	- External citations, backlinks from authoritative sources
39	- Brand mentions, industry recognition
40	- Published in recognized outlets
41	- Cited by other experts
42
43	### Trustworthiness
44	- Contact information, physical address
45	- Privacy policy, terms of service
46	- Customer testimonials, reviews
47	- Date stamps, transparent corrections
48	- Secure site (HTTPS)
49
50	## Content Metrics
51
52	### Word Count Analysis
53	Compare against page type minimums:
54	\| Page Type \| Minimum \|
55	\|-----------\|---------\|
56	\| Homepage \| 500 \|
57	\| Service page \| 800 \|
58	\| Blog post \| 1,500 \|
59	\| Product page \| 300+ (400+ for complex products) \|
60	\| Location page \| 500-600 \|
61
62	> Important: These are topical coverage floors, not targets. Google has confirmed word count is NOT a direct ranking factor. The goal is comprehensive topical coverage; a 500-word page that thoroughly answers the query will outrank a 2,000-word page that doesn't. Use these as guidelines for adequate coverage depth, not rigid requirements.
63
64	### Readability
65	- Flesch Reading Ease: target 60-70 for general audience
66
67	> Note: Flesch Reading Ease is a useful proxy for content accessibility but is NOT a direct Google ranking factor. John Mueller has confirmed Google does not use basic readability scores for ranking. Yoast deprioritized Flesch scores in v19.3. Use readability analysis as a content quality indicator, not as an SEO metric to optimize directly.
68	- Grade level: match target audience
69	- Sentence length: average 15-20 words
70	- Paragraph length: 2-4 sentences
71
72	### Keyword Optimization
73	- Primary keyword in title, H1, first 100 words
74	- Natural density (1-3%)
75	- Semantic variations present
76	- No keyword stuffing
77
78	### Content Structure
79	- Logical heading hierarchy (H1 -> H2 -> H3)
80	- Scannable sections with descriptive headings
81	- Bullet/numbered lists where appropriate
82	- Table of contents for long-form content
83
84	### Multimedia
85	- Relevant images with proper alt text
86	- Videos where appropriate
87	- Infographics for complex data
88	- Charts/graphs for statistics
89
90	### Internal Linking
91	- 3-5 relevant internal links per 1000 words
92	- Descriptive anchor text
93	- Links to related content
94	- No orphan pages
95
96	### External Linking
97	- Cite authoritative sources
98	- Open in new tab for user experience
99	- Reasonable count (not excessive)
100
101	## AI Content Assessment (Sept 2025 QRG addition)
102
103	Google's raters assess low-quality, scaled, copied, or AI-generated main content patterns rather than AI authorship as a standalone issue.
104
105	### Acceptable AI Content
106	- Demonstrates genuine E-E-A-T
107	- Provides unique value
108	- Has human oversight and editing
109	- Contains original insights
110
111	### Low-Quality AI Content Markers
112	- Generic phrasing, lack of specificity
113	- No original insight
114	- Repetitive structure across pages
115	- No author attribution
116	- Factual inaccuracies
117
118	> Helpful Content System (March 2024): The Helpful Content System was merged into Google's core ranking algorithm during the March 2024 core update. It no longer operates as a standalone classifier. Helpfulness signa

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type

seo-content

4.0kinstalls1.8kforks

View on GitHub

How to install seo-content?

agricidaniel/claude-seo/seo-content

$npx -y skills add AgriciDaniel/claude-seo --skill seo-content

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# Content Quality & E-E-A-T Analysis
2
3	## Google's "Who / How / Why" Test (canonical heuristic)
4
5	Before scoring E-E-A-T sub-factors, every page audit should pass Google's
6	own three-question heuristic from the helpful-content guide:
7
8	\| Question \| What to look for \|
9	\|---\|---\|
10	\| Who created it? \| Visible byline, author bio page, professional credentials. Required where readers expect it; non-negotiable for YMYL. \|
11	\| How was it created? \| Process disclosure where readers would reasonably ask, especially for AI-assisted content. Original research / first-hand evidence / lived experience. \|
12	\| Why does it exist? \| "To help people" rather than "to attract search clicks." Watch for niche entry without expertise, content churn for freshness signals, content written to a word-count target. \|
13
14	Primary source:
15	https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/creating-helpful-content
16
17	When all three answers are weak, the page is at risk under the core ranking
18	system's helpfulness signals (formerly the standalone Helpful Content System,
19	merged into core during the March 2024 update).
20
21	## E-E-A-T Framework (updated Sept 2025 QRG)
22
23	Read `skills/seo/references/eeat-framework.md` for full criteria.
24
25	### Experience (first-hand signals)
26	- Original research, case studies, before/after results
27	- Personal anecdotes, process documentation
28	- Unique data, proprietary insights
29	- Photos/videos from direct experience
30
31	### Expertise
32	- Author credentials, certifications, bio
33	- Professional background relevant to topic
34	- Technical depth appropriate for audience
35	- Accurate, well-sourced claims
36
37	### Authoritativeness
38	- External citations, backlinks from authoritative sources
39	- Brand mentions, industry recognition
40	- Published in recognized outlets
41	- Cited by other experts
42
43	### Trustworthiness
44	- Contact information, physical address
45	- Privacy policy, terms of service
46	- Customer testimonials, reviews
47	- Date stamps, transparent corrections
48	- Secure site (HTTPS)
49
50	## Content Metrics
51
52	### Word Count Analysis
53	Compare against page type minimums:
54	\| Page Type \| Minimum \|
55	\|-----------\|---------\|
56	\| Homepage \| 500 \|
57	\| Service page \| 800 \|
58	\| Blog post \| 1,500 \|
59	\| Product page \| 300+ (400+ for complex products) \|
60	\| Location page \| 500-600 \|
61
62	> Important: These are topical coverage floors, not targets. Google has confirmed word count is NOT a direct ranking factor. The goal is comprehensive topical coverage; a 500-word page that thoroughly answers the query will outrank a 2,000-word page that doesn't. Use these as guidelines for adequate coverage depth, not rigid requirements.
63
64	### Readability
65	- Flesch Reading Ease: target 60-70 for general audience
66
67	> Note: Flesch Reading Ease is a useful proxy for content accessibility but is NOT a direct Google ranking factor. John Mueller has confirmed Google does not use basic readability scores for ranking. Yoast deprioritized Flesch scores in v19.3. Use readability analysis as a content quality indicator, not as an SEO metric to optimize directly.
68	- Grade level: match target audience
69	- Sentence length: average 15-20 words
70	- Paragraph length: 2-4 sentences
71
72	### Keyword Optimization
73	- Primary keyword in title, H1, first 100 words
74	- Natural density (1-3%)
75	- Semantic variations present
76	- No keyword stuffing
77
78	### Content Structure
79	- Logical heading hierarchy (H1 -> H2 -> H3)
80	- Scannable sections with descriptive headings
81	- Bullet/numbered lists where appropriate
82	- Table of contents for long-form content
83
84	### Multimedia
85	- Relevant images with proper alt text
86	- Videos where appropriate
87	- Infographics for complex data
88	- Charts/graphs for statistics
89
90	### Internal Linking
91	- 3-5 relevant internal links per 1000 words
92	- Descriptive anchor text
93	- Links to related content
94	- No orphan pages
95
96	### External Linking
97	- Cite authoritative sources
98	- Open in new tab for user experience
99	- Reasonable count (not excessive)
100
101	## AI Content Assessment (Sept 2025 QRG addition)
102
103	Google's raters assess low-quality, scaled, copied, or AI-generated main content patterns rather than AI authorship as a standalone issue.
104
105	### Acceptable AI Content
106	- Demonstrates genuine E-E-A-T
107	- Provides unique value
108	- Has human oversight and editing
109	- Contains original insights
110
111	### Low-Quality AI Content Markers
112	- Generic phrasing, lack of specificity
113	- No original insight
114	- Repetitive structure across pages
115	- No author attribution
116	- Factual inaccuracies
117
118	> Helpful Content System (March 2024): The Helpful Content System was merged into Google's core ranking algorithm during the March 2024 core update. It no longer operates as a standalone classifier. Helpfulness signa

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type