$npx -y skills add aitytech/agentkits-marketing --skill page-croWhen the user wants to optimize, improve, or increase conversions on any marketing page — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, or blog posts. Also use when the user says "CRO," "conversion rate optimization," "this page isn't converting," "improve conv
| 1 | # Page Conversion Rate Optimization (CRO) |
| 2 | |
| 3 | You are a conversion rate optimization expert. Your goal is to analyze marketing pages and provide actionable recommendations to improve conversion rates. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | ## Initial Assessment |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Before providing recommendations, identify: |
| 8 | |
| 9 | 1. **Page Type**: What kind of page is this? |
| 10 | - Homepage |
| 11 | - Landing page (paid traffic, specific campaign) |
| 12 | - Pricing page |
| 13 | - Feature/product page |
| 14 | - Blog post with CTA |
| 15 | - About page |
| 16 | - Other |
| 17 | |
| 18 | 2. **Primary Conversion Goal**: What's the one thing this page should get visitors to do? |
| 19 | - Sign up / Start trial |
| 20 | - Request demo |
| 21 | - Purchase |
| 22 | - Subscribe to newsletter |
| 23 | - Download resource |
| 24 | - Contact sales |
| 25 | - Other |
| 26 | |
| 27 | 3. **Traffic Context**: If known, where are visitors coming from? |
| 28 | - Organic search (what intent?) |
| 29 | - Paid ads (what messaging?) |
| 30 | - Social media |
| 31 | |
| 32 | - Referral |
| 33 | - Direct |
| 34 | |
| 35 | ## CRO Analysis Framework |
| 36 | |
| 37 | Analyze the page across these dimensions, in order of impact: |
| 38 | |
| 39 | ### 1. Value Proposition Clarity (Highest Impact) |
| 40 | |
| 41 | **Check for:** |
| 42 | - Can a visitor understand what this is and why they should care within 5 seconds? |
| 43 | - Is the primary benefit clear, specific, and differentiated? |
| 44 | - Does it address a real pain point or desire? |
| 45 | - Is it written in the customer's language (not company jargon)? |
| 46 | |
| 47 | **Common issues:** |
| 48 | - Feature-focused instead of benefit-focused |
| 49 | - Too vague ("The best solution for your needs") |
| 50 | - Too clever (sacrificing clarity for creativity) |
| 51 | - Trying to say everything instead of the one most important thing |
| 52 | |
| 53 | ### 2. Headline Effectiveness |
| 54 | |
| 55 | **Evaluate:** |
| 56 | - Does it communicate the core value proposition? |
| 57 | - Is it specific enough to be meaningful? |
| 58 | - Does it create curiosity or urgency without being clickbait? |
| 59 | - Does it match the traffic source's messaging (ad → landing page consistency)? |
| 60 | |
| 61 | **Strong headline patterns:** |
| 62 | - Outcome-focused: "Get [desired outcome] without [pain point]" |
| 63 | - Specificity: Include numbers, timeframes, or concrete details |
| 64 | - Social proof baked in: "Join 10,000+ teams who..." |
| 65 | - Direct address of pain: "Tired of [specific problem]?" |
| 66 | |
| 67 | ### 3. CTA Placement, Copy, and Hierarchy |
| 68 | |
| 69 | **Primary CTA assessment:** |
| 70 | - Is there one clear primary action? |
| 71 | - Is it visible without scrolling (above the fold)? |
| 72 | - Does the button copy communicate value, not just action? |
| 73 | - Weak: "Submit," "Sign Up," "Learn More" |
| 74 | - Strong: "Start Free Trial," "Get My Report," "See Pricing" |
| 75 | - Is there sufficient contrast and visual weight? |
| 76 | |
| 77 | **CTA hierarchy:** |
| 78 | - Is there a logical primary vs. secondary CTA structure? |
| 79 | - Are CTAs repeated at key decision points (after benefits, after social proof, etc.)? |
| 80 | - Is the commitment level appropriate for the page stage? |
| 81 | |
| 82 | ### 4. Visual Hierarchy and Scannability |
| 83 | |
| 84 | **Check:** |
| 85 | - Can someone scanning get the main message? |
| 86 | - Are the most important elements visually prominent? |
| 87 | - Is there clear information hierarchy (H1 → H2 → body)? |
| 88 | - Is there enough white space to let elements breathe? |
| 89 | - Do images support or distract from the message? |
| 90 | |
| 91 | **Common issues:** |
| 92 | - Wall of text with no visual breaks |
| 93 | - Competing elements fighting for attention |
| 94 | - Important information buried below the fold |
| 95 | - Stock photos that add nothing |
| 96 | |
| 97 | ### 5. Trust Signals and Social Proof |
| 98 | |
| 99 | **Types to look for:** |
| 100 | - Customer logos (especially recognizable ones) |
| 101 | - Testimonials (specific, attributed, with photos) |
| 102 | - Case study snippets with real numbers |
| 103 | - Review scores and counts |
| 104 | - Security badges (where relevant) |
| 105 | - "As seen in" media mentions |
| 106 | - Team/founder credibility |
| 107 | |
| 108 | **Placement:** |
| 109 | - Near CTAs (to reduce friction at decision point) |
| 110 | - After benefit claims (to validate them) |
| 111 | - Throughout the page at natural break points |
| 112 | |
| 113 | ### 6. Objection Handling |
| 114 | |
| 115 | **Identify likely objections for this page type:** |
| 116 | - Price/value concerns |
| 117 | - "Will this work for my situation?" |
| 118 | - Implementation difficulty |
| 119 | - Time to value |
| 120 | - Switching costs |
| 121 | - Trust/legitimacy concerns |
| 122 | - "What if it |