$npx -y skills add AlexAI-MCP/hermes-CCC --skill hermes-skillCreate, improve, inventory, and audit Claude Code skills. Use when turning a solved workflow into a reusable skill, expanding an existing skill, checking trigger quality, or standardizing a skill pack.
| 1 | # Hermes Skill |
| 2 | |
| 3 | ## Purpose |
| 4 | |
| 5 | - Convert repeated workflows into reusable Claude Code skills. |
| 6 | - Keep skills operational rather than descriptive. |
| 7 | - Improve trigger quality so the right skill activates at the right time. |
| 8 | - Audit skill packs for overlap, drift, and incomplete instructions. |
| 9 | - Preserve working patterns after a successful task. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | ## Required Skill Anatomy |
| 12 | |
| 13 | - one folder per skill |
| 14 | - one `SKILL.md` file per folder |
| 15 | - YAML frontmatter at the top |
| 16 | - Markdown instructions below the frontmatter |
| 17 | - commands, outputs, and failure handling in the body |
| 18 | |
| 19 | ## Frontmatter Schema For This Package |
| 20 | |
| 21 | - `name` |
| 22 | - `description` |
| 23 | - `version` |
| 24 | - `author` |
| 25 | - `license` |
| 26 | - `metadata` |
| 27 | |
| 28 | ## Description Rules |
| 29 | |
| 30 | - State what the skill does. |
| 31 | - State when to use it. |
| 32 | - Mention trigger contexts directly. |
| 33 | - Avoid vague phrasing such as "general helper". |
| 34 | - Include important boundaries when the skill is domain-specific. |
| 35 | |
| 36 | ## Naming Rules |
| 37 | |
| 38 | - use lowercase letters, digits, and hyphens only |
| 39 | - keep names short and concrete |
| 40 | - prefer operational nouns or verb-noun pairs |
| 41 | - avoid project-specific private jargon unless the package is private |
| 42 | - do not rename a stable public skill casually |
| 43 | |
| 44 | ## Create Workflow |
| 45 | |
| 46 | 1. Identify a repeated workflow that was just solved. |
| 47 | 2. Extract the reusable steps, not the chat narrative. |
| 48 | 3. List the exact tools, commands, and files involved. |
| 49 | 4. Identify preconditions and failure modes. |
| 50 | 5. Write the frontmatter with strong trigger language. |
| 51 | 6. Write the body as an operator playbook. |
| 52 | 7. Include output contracts where consistency matters. |
| 53 | 8. Include examples only when they sharpen execution. |
| 54 | |
| 55 | ## Improve Workflow |
| 56 | |
| 57 | 1. Read the full skill. |
| 58 | 2. Ask what failed or felt ambiguous in actual usage. |
| 59 | 3. Tighten the description if triggering was weak. |
| 60 | 4. Add missing commands or environment assumptions. |
| 61 | 5. Add decision rules where the old version left too much ambiguity. |
| 62 | 6. Add failure handling if the skill assumed a happy path. |
| 63 | 7. Remove stale instructions and dead commands. |
| 64 | |
| 65 | ## Audit Dimensions |
| 66 | |
| 67 | - trigger clarity |
| 68 | - instruction quality |
| 69 | - command accuracy |
| 70 | - line-count sufficiency |
| 71 | - duplication with nearby skills |
| 72 | - presence of decision rules |
| 73 | - presence of output contracts |
| 74 | - presence of verification steps |
| 75 | |
| 76 | ## What Makes A Good Skill |
| 77 | |
| 78 | - It reduces repeated thinking. |
| 79 | - It includes exact actions for non-obvious steps. |
| 80 | - It names the right tools and commands. |
| 81 | - It narrows ambiguity without overfitting one repo. |
| 82 | - It handles the common failure path. |
| 83 | - It is faster to use than rediscovering the workflow. |
| 84 | |
| 85 | ## What Makes A Bad Skill |
| 86 | |
| 87 | - It repeats generic advice the base model already knows. |
| 88 | - It has weak frontmatter and never triggers. |
| 89 | - It explains philosophy but omits execution. |
| 90 | - It contains stale paths or commands. |
| 91 | - It is so narrow that it only matches one past task. |
| 92 | - It has no failure modes or verification guidance. |
| 93 | |
| 94 | ## Skill Extraction Questions |
| 95 | |
| 96 | - What exact problem was solved? |
| 97 | - What sequence of actions worked? |
| 98 | - What tools or connectors were essential? |
| 99 | - What surprised us during execution? |
| 100 | - What constraints would another agent need to know up front? |
| 101 | - What output structure made the result useful? |
| 102 | |
| 103 | ## Standard Sections To Include |
| 104 | |
| 105 | - purpose |
| 106 | - activation signals |
| 107 | - inputs |
| 108 | - preflight |
| 109 | - step-by-step procedure |
| 110 | - decision rules |
| 111 | - output contract |
| 112 | - failure modes |
| 113 | - examples |
| 114 | - checklist |
| 115 | |
| 116 | ## Inventory Workflow |
| 117 | |
| 118 | 1. List all skill folders. |
| 119 | 2. Verify that each folder contains `SKILL.md`. |
| 120 | 3. Read frontmatter fields. |
| 121 | 4. Produce a compact table of name, description, and health. |
| 122 | 5. Flag missing or malformed skills. |
| 123 | |
| 124 | ## Overlap Rules |
| 125 | |
| 126 | - Two skills may overlap in domain but should differ in operating goal. |
| 127 | - Merge skills if their triggers, commands, and outputs are nearly identical. |
| 128 | - Keep separate skills if one is strategic and the other is procedural. |
| 129 | - Prefer smaller focused skills over one giant omnibus skill. |
| 130 | |
| 131 | ## Updating From Real Usage |
| 132 | |
| 133 | - Capture friction immediately after using a skill. |
| 134 | - Update the skill while the failure mode is fresh. |
| 135 | - Preserve examples that encode real mistakes. |
| 136 | - Replace speculative guidance with validated instructions. |
| 137 | |
| 138 | ## Example Improvement Targets |
| 139 | |
| 140 | - add missing prereq checks |
| 141 | - tighten "when to use" language |
| 142 | - replace obsolete CLI flags |
| 143 | - add a markdown response template |
| 144 | - split one overloaded skill into two |
| 145 | |
| 146 | ## Audit Output Template |
| 147 | |
| 148 | ```markdown |
| 149 | Skill audit report: |
| 150 | - systematic-debugging: Healthy - clear phases, explicit outputs, and verification loop |
| 151 | - old-review-skill: Outdated - stale GitHub CLI commands and no failure handling |
| 152 | - d |