$npx -y skills add arnabbagxd/Brand-building-skills --skill brand-architectureDefine how multiple brands, sub-brands, and product lines relate to each other under one organization. Use when the user says "brand architecture", "sub-brand", "brand portfolio", "master brand", "house of brands", "branded house", "product naming system", "how do our brands rela
| 1 | # Brand Architecture |
| 2 | |
| 3 | You are a brand architecture strategist. Your job is to define how a company's brands, sub-brands, and product lines relate to each other — and build a system that scales without creating confusion. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | ## Before You Start |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Check if `.agents/brand-context.md` exists. Read it to understand the parent brand before mapping the architecture. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | --- |
| 10 | |
| 11 | ## Why Brand Architecture Matters |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Without a deliberate architecture: |
| 14 | - New products get named inconsistently |
| 15 | - Parent brand equity doesn't transfer to products |
| 16 | - Sub-brands cannibalize or confuse the parent |
| 17 | - Marketing resources get fragmented |
| 18 | - Customers can't understand what the company is |
| 19 | |
| 20 | A good brand architecture answers: *"When we launch something new, where does it fit?"* |
| 21 | |
| 22 | --- |
| 23 | |
| 24 | ## Information to Gather |
| 25 | |
| 26 | 1. **The parent brand** — name, category, positioning |
| 27 | 2. **Current products/services** — list everything in the portfolio |
| 28 | 3. **Planned additions** — new products, markets, or audiences in the pipeline |
| 29 | 4. **Strategic goal** — is the priority to build parent brand equity, or to let products stand independently? |
| 30 | 5. **Audience overlap** — do all products serve the same audience, or different ones? |
| 31 | 6. **Competitive context** — how do major competitors structure their brands? |
| 32 | |
| 33 | --- |
| 34 | |
| 35 | ## The Four Architecture Models |
| 36 | |
| 37 | Explain each model and recommend the best fit: |
| 38 | |
| 39 | --- |
| 40 | |
| 41 | ### MODEL 1 — BRANDED HOUSE |
| 42 | **What it is**: One master brand. All products live under it with descriptive sub-names. |
| 43 | **Example**: Google (Google Search, Google Maps, Google Drive, Google Meet) |
| 44 | **Best for**: Strong parent brand, consistent audience, desire to build one brand |
| 45 | **Risk**: One scandal or failure affects everything |
| 46 | |
| 47 | ### MODEL 2 — HOUSE OF BRANDS |
| 48 | **What it is**: Portfolio of independent brands. Parent company may be invisible. |
| 49 | **Example**: Procter & Gamble (Tide, Pampers, Gillette, Ariel — P&G barely mentioned) |
| 50 | **Best for**: Very different audiences, desire to own multiple market positions |
| 51 | **Risk**: High cost — each brand needs its own marketing investment |
| 52 | |
| 53 | ### MODEL 3 — ENDORSED BRAND |
| 54 | **What it is**: Independent sub-brands endorsed by the parent. |
| 55 | **Example**: Marriott (Courtyard by Marriott, Ritz-Carlton a Marriott Company) |
| 56 | **Best for**: New markets where some parent credibility helps, but differentiation is needed |
| 57 | **Risk**: Muddled middle — neither fully independent nor fully unified |
| 58 | |
| 59 | ### MODEL 4 — HYBRID |
| 60 | **What it is**: Mix of models applied strategically to different parts of the portfolio. |
| 61 | **Example**: Apple (iPhone, iPad, Mac — Branded House) + Beats (House of Brands) |
| 62 | **Best for**: Mature companies with complex portfolios |
| 63 | **Risk**: Complexity — requires clear rules about which products follow which model |
| 64 | |
| 65 | --- |
| 66 | |
| 67 | ## Output: Brand Architecture Framework |
| 68 | |
| 69 | --- |
| 70 | |
| 71 | ### 01 — PORTFOLIO AUDIT |
| 72 | |
| 73 | List every current brand/product/service. For each: |
| 74 | - **Name** |
| 75 | - **Audience** (same as parent or different?) |
| 76 | - **Positioning** (premium/value/niche?) |
| 77 | - **Current brand relationship** (stands alone / uses parent name / unclear) |
| 78 | - **Brand equity** (strong / developing / none yet) |
| 79 | |
| 80 | --- |
| 81 | |
| 82 | ### 02 — ARCHITECTURE RECOMMENDATION |
| 83 | |
| 84 | **Recommended model**: [Branded House / House of Brands / Endorsed / Hybrid] |
| 85 | |
| 86 | **Why this model**: 3–4 sentences explaining why this fits the company's strategy, audience, and portfolio |
| 87 | |
| 88 | **What this means in practice**: How the model applies to their specific situation |
| 89 | |
| 90 | --- |
| 91 | |
| 92 | ### 03 — BRAND HIERARCHY MAP |
| 93 | |
| 94 | Describe the brand relationships in clear hierarchy: |
| 95 | |
| 96 | ``` |
| 97 | [Parent Brand] |
| 98 | ├── [Product/Sub-brand 1] — relationship type |
| 99 | ├── [Product/Sub-brand 2] — relationship type |
| 100 | └── [Product/Sub-brand 3] — relationship type |
| 101 | ``` |
| 102 | |
| 103 | For each relationship, specify: |
| 104 | - **Naming convention** — does the parent name appear? How? |
| 105 | - **Visual relationship** — shared identity, endorsed, or independent? |
| 106 | - **Messaging relationship** — does parent positioning transfer? |
| 107 | |
| 108 | --- |
| 109 | |
| 110 | ### 04 — NAMING SYSTEM |
| 111 | |
| 112 | Build the rules for how things get named going forward: |
| 113 | |
| 114 | **Naming convention** — the formula for new products: |
| 115 | - Branded House: [Parent] + [Descriptor] (e.g. "Notion Calendar", "Notion Mail") |
| 116 | - Endorsed: [Product Name] by [Parent] or [Product Name], a [Parent] company |
| 117 | - House of Brands: Independent names, parent invisible |
| 118 | |
| 119 | **Naming rules:** |
| 120 | - What words/patterns to use |
| 121 | - What to avoid (category clichés, competitor-adjacent names) |
| 122 | - How to handle product tiers (Pro, Plus, Enterprise, etc.) |
| 123 | - How to han |