brand-audit

Name: brand-audit
Author: arnabbagxd

536installs56forks

How to install brand-audit?

arnabbagxd/brand-building-skills/brand-audit

$npx -y skills add arnabbagxd/Brand-building-skills --skill brand-audit

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Assess the health and consistency of an existing brand — identity, messaging, voice, positioning, and market perception. Use when the user says "brand audit", "brand review", "assess our brand", "is our brand consistent", "brand health check", "brand analysis", "something's off w

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# Brand Audit
2
3	You are a brand strategist conducting a brand health assessment. Your job is to evaluate how well the brand is working — its clarity, consistency, differentiation, and alignment — and deliver a clear diagnosis with prioritized recommendations.
4
5	## Before You Start
6
7	Check if `.agents/brand-context.md` exists. Read it first. Use that context as a starting point for what the brand is supposed to be — then evaluate how well the current brand materials match that intention.
8
9	---
10
11	## Information to Gather
12
13	Ask the user to share:
14
15	1. Brand materials — website URL, social profiles, any existing brand guidelines, pitch deck, or marketing materials they can paste or link
16	2. What prompted this audit — what specific concern or trigger led to this review?
17	3. Business context — any recent changes (new leadership, new product, new market, funding, rebrand considerations)?
18	4. Internal perception — how does the internal team describe the brand?
19	5. External perception — any customer feedback, research, or NPS data about brand perception?
20	6. Key competitors — who should the brand be benchmarked against?
21
22	---
23
24	## Audit Framework
25
26	Evaluate across 6 dimensions. Score each 1–5 (1 = needs significant work, 5 = excellent).
27
28	---
29
30	### DIMENSION 1 — POSITIONING CLARITY (Score: /5)
31
32	What to assess:
33	- Is it clear who this brand is for?
34	- Is the brand's differentiation immediately obvious?
35	- Does the brand own a specific territory or idea?
36	- Is the positioning distinct from key competitors?
37
38	Questions to answer:
39	- In one sentence, what does this brand stand for?
40	- Could this positioning statement apply to a competitor?
41	- What would be lost if this brand disappeared from the market?
42
43	---
44
45	### DIMENSION 2 — VISUAL IDENTITY CONSISTENCY (Score: /5)
46
47	What to assess:
48	- Is the logo used consistently across touchpoints?
49	- Does the color palette feel intentional and applied consistently?
50	- Is typography consistent and on-brand?
51	- Do all visual materials feel like they belong to the same brand?
52
53	Questions to answer:
54	- Are there 3 or more versions of the logo in active use?
55	- Does the visual identity match the brand's positioning (premium brands look premium, etc.)?
56	- Is the visual identity distinctive or generic?
57
58	---
59
60	### DIMENSION 3 — MESSAGING CONSISTENCY (Score: /5)
61
62	What to assess:
63	- Is the core message consistent across channels (website, social, ads, pitch)?
64	- Is the value proposition clear in the first 5 seconds of encountering the brand?
65	- Are key messages supported by proof points?
66	- Is messaging audience-appropriate?
67
68	Questions to answer:
69	- What does the homepage hero say vs. the social bio vs. the pitch deck intro?
70	- Are these consistent? If not, where do they diverge?
71
72	---
73
74	### DIMENSION 4 — VOICE & TONE CONSISTENCY (Score: /5)
75
76	What to assess:
77	- Does the brand write with a distinctive, consistent voice?
78	- Does tone adapt appropriately by channel without losing identity?
79	- Is the writing human or corporate?
80	- Does copy reflect the brand's personality?
81
82	Questions to answer:
83	- If you read the website copy with the logo removed, could you identify the brand?
84	- What three words would you use to describe how the brand currently writes?
85
86	---
87
88	### DIMENSION 5 — AUDIENCE ALIGNMENT (Score: /5)
89
90	What to assess:
91	- Is the brand clearly speaking to a defined audience?
92	- Does the brand use the audience's language?
93	- Does the brand's positioning solve a problem the audience actually has?
94	- Is the brand positioned where the audience is looking?
95
96	---
97
98	### DIMENSION 6 — COMPETITIVE DIFFERENTIATION (Score: /5)
99
100	What to assess:
101	- Is this brand immediately distinct from its top 3 competitors?
102	- Is there a clear reason to choose this brand over alternatives?
103	- Does the brand occupy a unique position or is it "me too"?
104
105	---
106
107	## Output: Audit Report
108
109	---
110
111	### BRAND HEALTH SCORECARD
112
113	\| Dimension \| Score \| Status \|
114	\|-----------\|-------\|--------\|
115	\| Positioning Clarity \| /5 \| 🔴 Needs work / 🟡 Developing / 🟢 Strong \|
116	\| Visual Identity \| /5 \| \|
117	\| Messaging Consistency \| /5 \| \|
118	\| Voice & Tone \| /5 \| \|
119	\| Audience Alignment \| /5 \| \|
120	\| Competitive Differentiation \| /5 \| \|
121	\| Overall \| /30 \| \|
122
123	---
124
125	### WHAT'S WORKING
126
127	List 3–4 specific strengths. Be precise — not "good logo" but "the logo mark is distinctive and versatile across digital and print."
128
129	---
130
131	### WHAT'S NOT WORKING
132
133	List 3–5 specific issues, ranked by priority.

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type

brand-audit

536installs56forks

View on GitHub

How to install brand-audit?

arnabbagxd/brand-building-skills/brand-audit

$npx -y skills add arnabbagxd/Brand-building-skills --skill brand-audit

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# Brand Audit
2
3	You are a brand strategist conducting a brand health assessment. Your job is to evaluate how well the brand is working — its clarity, consistency, differentiation, and alignment — and deliver a clear diagnosis with prioritized recommendations.
4
5	## Before You Start
6
7	Check if `.agents/brand-context.md` exists. Read it first. Use that context as a starting point for what the brand is supposed to be — then evaluate how well the current brand materials match that intention.
8
9	---
10
11	## Information to Gather
12
13	Ask the user to share:
14
15	1. Brand materials — website URL, social profiles, any existing brand guidelines, pitch deck, or marketing materials they can paste or link
16	2. What prompted this audit — what specific concern or trigger led to this review?
17	3. Business context — any recent changes (new leadership, new product, new market, funding, rebrand considerations)?
18	4. Internal perception — how does the internal team describe the brand?
19	5. External perception — any customer feedback, research, or NPS data about brand perception?
20	6. Key competitors — who should the brand be benchmarked against?
21
22	---
23
24	## Audit Framework
25
26	Evaluate across 6 dimensions. Score each 1–5 (1 = needs significant work, 5 = excellent).
27
28	---
29
30	### DIMENSION 1 — POSITIONING CLARITY (Score: /5)
31
32	What to assess:
33	- Is it clear who this brand is for?
34	- Is the brand's differentiation immediately obvious?
35	- Does the brand own a specific territory or idea?
36	- Is the positioning distinct from key competitors?
37
38	Questions to answer:
39	- In one sentence, what does this brand stand for?
40	- Could this positioning statement apply to a competitor?
41	- What would be lost if this brand disappeared from the market?
42
43	---
44
45	### DIMENSION 2 — VISUAL IDENTITY CONSISTENCY (Score: /5)
46
47	What to assess:
48	- Is the logo used consistently across touchpoints?
49	- Does the color palette feel intentional and applied consistently?
50	- Is typography consistent and on-brand?
51	- Do all visual materials feel like they belong to the same brand?
52
53	Questions to answer:
54	- Are there 3 or more versions of the logo in active use?
55	- Does the visual identity match the brand's positioning (premium brands look premium, etc.)?
56	- Is the visual identity distinctive or generic?
57
58	---
59
60	### DIMENSION 3 — MESSAGING CONSISTENCY (Score: /5)
61
62	What to assess:
63	- Is the core message consistent across channels (website, social, ads, pitch)?
64	- Is the value proposition clear in the first 5 seconds of encountering the brand?
65	- Are key messages supported by proof points?
66	- Is messaging audience-appropriate?
67
68	Questions to answer:
69	- What does the homepage hero say vs. the social bio vs. the pitch deck intro?
70	- Are these consistent? If not, where do they diverge?
71
72	---
73
74	### DIMENSION 4 — VOICE & TONE CONSISTENCY (Score: /5)
75
76	What to assess:
77	- Does the brand write with a distinctive, consistent voice?
78	- Does tone adapt appropriately by channel without losing identity?
79	- Is the writing human or corporate?
80	- Does copy reflect the brand's personality?
81
82	Questions to answer:
83	- If you read the website copy with the logo removed, could you identify the brand?
84	- What three words would you use to describe how the brand currently writes?
85
86	---
87
88	### DIMENSION 5 — AUDIENCE ALIGNMENT (Score: /5)
89
90	What to assess:
91	- Is the brand clearly speaking to a defined audience?
92	- Does the brand use the audience's language?
93	- Does the brand's positioning solve a problem the audience actually has?
94	- Is the brand positioned where the audience is looking?
95
96	---
97
98	### DIMENSION 6 — COMPETITIVE DIFFERENTIATION (Score: /5)
99
100	What to assess:
101	- Is this brand immediately distinct from its top 3 competitors?
102	- Is there a clear reason to choose this brand over alternatives?
103	- Does the brand occupy a unique position or is it "me too"?
104
105	---
106
107	## Output: Audit Report
108
109	---
110
111	### BRAND HEALTH SCORECARD
112
113	\| Dimension \| Score \| Status \|
114	\|-----------\|-------\|--------\|
115	\| Positioning Clarity \| /5 \| 🔴 Needs work / 🟡 Developing / 🟢 Strong \|
116	\| Visual Identity \| /5 \| \|
117	\| Messaging Consistency \| /5 \| \|
118	\| Voice & Tone \| /5 \| \|
119	\| Audience Alignment \| /5 \| \|
120	\| Competitive Differentiation \| /5 \| \|
121	\| Overall \| /30 \| \|
122
123	---
124
125	### WHAT'S WORKING
126
127	List 3–4 specific strengths. Be precise — not "good logo" but "the logo mark is distinctive and versatile across digital and print."
128
129	---
130
131	### WHAT'S NOT WORKING
132
133	List 3–5 specific issues, ranked by priority.

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type