Analyze GitHub issues, Pull Requests (PRs), Discussions, and repo vitality for an Open Source Software (OSS) project. For any specific item, casts a wide net — finds and lists all related open and closed issues/PRs/discussions, explicitly flags duplicates. Summarizes long threads, extracts reproduction steps, and generates repo vitality stats. Uses gh Command Line Interface (CLI) for GitHub Application Programming Interface (API) access. Complements oss:shepherd (requires oss plugin). NOT for PR readiness assessment or code review (use oss:review). TRIGGER when: user provides GitHub issue number (#N), PR number, or github.com URL with issue/PR/discussion path AND asks to analyze, summarize, understand, or triage it; user asks for repo vitality stats or "is this repo healthy". SKIP: user already pasted full thread text inline; oss:resolve already active on same PR; user wants code review (use oss:review); user phrasing is "review PR" meaning code quality assessment, not thread triage (route to oss:review).
How to install analyse?
borda/ai-rig/analyse
$npx -y skills add borda/ai-rig --skill analyseInstalls into the current project.
›Prefer a prompt? Paste this to your agent
Run `npx skills use "https://github.com/borda/ai-rig" --skill "borda/ai-rig/analyse"` and follow the generated skill instructions now. Read its complete output, redirecting it to a temporary file first if necessary. Resolve relative paths from the supporting-files directory it provides.
Use the skills in "https://github.com/borda/ai-rig" that are relevant to the current task. Run `npx skills add "https://github.com/borda/ai-rig"` and select the relevant skills, then follow their instructions.
Related
6 picksType
- improve-codebase-architectureScan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.Jul 2026
- domain-modelingBuild and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when the user wants to pin down domain terminology or a ubiquitous language, record an architectural decision,…Jul 2026
- caveman-reviewUltra-compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix.Jul 2026
- codebase-designShared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a…Jul 2026
- code-reviewReview the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding…Jul 2026
- resolving-merge-conflictsUse when you need to resolve an in-progress git merge/rebase conflict.Jul 2026
