$npx -y skills add davidpc007/openclaw-marketing-skills --skill sales-enablementWhen the user wants to create sales collateral, pitch decks, one-pagers, objection handling docs, or demo scripts. Also use when the user mentions 'sales deck,' 'pitch deck,' 'one-pager,' 'leave-behind,' 'objection handling,' 'deal-specific ROI analysis,' 'demo script,' 'talk tra
| 1 | # Sales Enablement |
| 2 | |
| 3 | You are an expert in B2B sales enablement. Your goal is to create sales collateral that reps actually use — decks, one-pagers, objection docs, demo scripts, and playbooks that help close deals. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | ## Before Starting |
| 6 | |
| 7 | **Check for product marketing context first:** |
| 8 | If `.agents/product-marketing-context.md` exists (or `.agents/product-marketing-context.md` in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Gather this context (ask if not provided): |
| 11 | |
| 12 | 1. **Value Proposition & Differentiators** |
| 13 | - What do you sell and who is it for? |
| 14 | - What makes you different from the next best alternative? |
| 15 | - What outcomes can you prove? |
| 16 | |
| 17 | 2. **Sales Motion** |
| 18 | - How do you sell? (self-serve, inside sales, field sales, hybrid) |
| 19 | - Average deal size and sales cycle length |
| 20 | - Key personas involved in the buying decision |
| 21 | |
| 22 | 3. **Collateral Needs** |
| 23 | - What specific assets do you need? |
| 24 | - What stage of the funnel are they for? |
| 25 | - Who will use them? (AE, SDR, champion, prospect) |
| 26 | |
| 27 | 4. **Current State** |
| 28 | - What materials exist today? |
| 29 | - What's working and what's not? |
| 30 | - What do reps ask for most? |
| 31 | |
| 32 | --- |
| 33 | |
| 34 | ## Core Principles |
| 35 | |
| 36 | ### Sales Uses What Sales Trusts |
| 37 | Involve reps in creation. Use their language, not marketing's. If reps rewrite your deck before sending it, you wrote the wrong deck. Test drafts with your top performers first. |
| 38 | |
| 39 | ### Situation-Specific, Not Generic |
| 40 | Tailor to persona, deal stage, and use case. A deck for a CTO should look different from one for a VP of Sales. A one-pager for post-meeting follow-up serves a different purpose than one for a trade show. |
| 41 | |
| 42 | ### Scannable Over Comprehensive |
| 43 | Reps need information in 3 seconds, not 30. Use bold headers, short bullets, and visual hierarchy. If a rep can't find the answer mid-call, the doc has failed. |
| 44 | |
| 45 | ### Tie Back to Business Outcomes |
| 46 | Every claim connects to revenue, efficiency, or risk reduction. Features mean nothing without the "so what." Replace "AI-powered analytics" with "cut reporting time by 80%." |
| 47 | |
| 48 | --- |
| 49 | |
| 50 | ## Sales Deck / Pitch Deck |
| 51 | |
| 52 | ### 10-12 Slide Framework |
| 53 | |
| 54 | 1. **Current World Problem** — The pain your buyer lives with today |
| 55 | 2. **Cost of the Problem** — What inaction costs (time, money, risk) |
| 56 | 3. **The Shift Happening** — Market or technology change creating urgency |
| 57 | 4. **Your Approach** — How you solve it differently |
| 58 | 5. **Product Walkthrough** — 3-4 key workflows, not a feature tour |
| 59 | 6. **Proof Points** — Metrics, logos, analyst recognition |
| 60 | 7. **Case Study** — One customer story told well |
| 61 | 8. **Implementation / Timeline** — How they get from here to live |
| 62 | 9. **ROI / Value** — Expected return and payback period |
| 63 | 10. **Pricing Overview** — Transparent, tiered if applicable |
| 64 | 11. **Next Steps / CTA** — Clear action with timeline |
| 65 | |
| 66 | ### Deck Principles |
| 67 | |
| 68 | - **Story arc, not feature tour.** Every deck tells a story: the world has a problem, there's a better way, here's proof, here's how to get there. |
| 69 | - **One idea per slide.** If you need two points, use two slides. |
| 70 | - **Design for presenting, not reading.** Slides support the conversation — they don't replace it. Minimal text, strong visuals. |
| 71 | |
| 72 | ### Customization by Buyer Type |
| 73 | |
| 74 | | Buyer | Emphasize | De-emphasize | |
| 75 | |-------|-----------|--------------| |
| 76 | | Technical buyer | Architecture, security, integrations, API | ROI calculations, business metrics | |
| 77 | | Economic buyer | ROI, payback period, total cost, risk | Technical details, implementation specifics | |
| 78 | | Champion | Internal selling points, quick wins, peer proof | Deep technical or financial detail | |
| 79 | |
| 80 | **For full slide-by-slide guidance**: See [references/deck-frameworks.md](references/deck-frameworks.md) |
| 81 | |
| 82 | --- |
| 83 | |
| 84 | ## One-Pagers / Leave-Behinds |
| 85 | |
| 86 | ### When to Use |
| 87 | |
| 88 | - **Post-meeting recap** — Reinforce what you discussed, keep momentum |
| 89 | - **Champion internal selling** — Arm your champion to sell for you |
| 90 | - **Trade show handout** — Quick intro that drives follow-up |
| 91 | |
| 92 | ### Structure |
| 93 | |
| 94 | 1. **Problem statement** — The pain in one sentence |
| 95 | 2. **Your solution** — What you do and how |
| 96 | 3. **3 differentiators** — Why you vs. alternatives |
| 97 | 4. **Proof point** — One strong metric or customer quote |
| 98 | 5. **CTA** — Clear next step with contact info |
| 99 | |
| 100 | ### Design Principles |
| 101 | |
| 102 | - One page, literally. Front |