$npx -y skills add elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter --skill bb-local-toolkitLocal-tooling companion to the bug-bounty orchestrator — carries the SAME complete bug-bounty workflow, but reach for THIS variant when you also need to resolve where tools, wordlists, and clones are installed on the local machine (jhaddix, SecLists, trufflehog, ffuf, dalfox, gha
| 1 | # Bug Bounty Master Workflow |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Full pipeline: Recon -> Learn -> Hunt -> Validate -> Report. One skill for everything. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | ## THE ONLY QUESTION THAT MATTERS |
| 6 | |
| 7 | > **"Can an attacker do this RIGHT NOW against a real user who has taken NO unusual actions -- and does it cause real harm (stolen money, leaked PII, account takeover, code execution)?"** |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > If the answer is NO -- **STOP. Do not write. Do not explore further. Move on.** |
| 10 | |
| 11 | ### Theoretical Bug = Wasted Time. Kill These Immediately: |
| 12 | |
| 13 | | Pattern | Kill Reason | |
| 14 | |---|---| |
| 15 | | "Could theoretically allow..." | Not exploitable = not a bug | |
| 16 | | "An attacker with X, Y, Z conditions could..." | Too many preconditions | |
| 17 | | "Wrong implementation but no practical impact" | Wrong but harmless = not a bug | |
| 18 | | Dead code with a bug in it | Not reachable = not a bug | |
| 19 | | Source maps without secrets | No impact | |
| 20 | | SSRF with DNS-only callback | Need data exfil or internal access | |
| 21 | | Open redirect alone | Need ATO or OAuth chain | |
| 22 | | "Could be used in a chain if..." | Build the chain first, THEN report | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | **You must demonstrate actual harm. "Could" is not a bug. Prove it works or drop it.** |
| 25 | |
| 26 | --- |
| 27 | |
| 28 | ## CRITICAL RULES |
| 29 | |
| 30 | 1. **READ FULL SCOPE FIRST** -- verify every asset/domain is owned by the target org |
| 31 | 2. **NO THEORETICAL BUGS** -- "Can an attacker steal funds, leak PII, takeover account, or execute code RIGHT NOW?" If no, STOP. |
| 32 | 3. **KILL WEAK FINDINGS FAST** -- run the 7-Question Gate BEFORE writing any report |
| 33 | 4. **Validate before writing** -- check CHANGELOG, design docs, deployment scripts FIRST |
| 34 | 5. **One bug class at a time** -- go deep, don't spray |
| 35 | 6. **Verify data isn't already public** -- check web UI in incognito before reporting API "leaks" |
| 36 | 7. **5-MINUTE RULE** -- if a target shows nothing after 5 min probing (all 401/403/404), MOVE ON |
| 37 | 8. **IMPACT-FIRST HUNTING** -- ask "what's the worst thing if auth was broken?" If nothing valuable, skip target |
| 38 | 9. **CREDENTIAL LEAKS need exploitation proof** -- finding keys isn't enough, must PROVE what they access |
| 39 | 10. **STOP SHALLOW RECON SPIRALS** -- don't probe 403s, don't grep for analytics keys, don't check staging domains that lead nowhere |
| 40 | 11. **BUSINESS IMPACT over vuln class** -- severity depends on CONTEXT, not just vuln type |
| 41 | 12. **UNDERSTAND THE TARGET DEEPLY** -- before hunting, learn the app like a real user |
| 42 | 13. **DON'T OVER-RELY ON AUTOMATION** -- automated scans hit WAFs, trigger rate limits, find the same bugs everyone else finds |
| 43 | 14. **HUNT LESS-SATURATED VULN CLASSES** -- XSS/SSRF/XXE have the most competition. Expand into: cache poisoning, Android/mobile vulns, business logic, race conditions, OAuth/OIDC chains, CI/CD pipeline attacks |
| 44 | 15. **ONE-HOUR RULE** -- stuck on one target for an hour with no progress? SWITCH CONTEXT |
| 45 | 16. **TWO-EYE APPROACH** -- combine systematic testing (checklist) with anomaly detection (watch for unexpected behavior) |
| 46 | 17. **T-SHAPED KNOWLEDGE** -- go DEEP in one area and BROAD across everything else |
| 47 | |
| 48 | > **For the full hunting methodology** — 5-phase non-linear workflow, developer psychology framework, session discipline, tool routing by phase, and Wide/Deep route selection — see **`skills/bb-methodology/SKILL.md`**. |
| 49 | |
| 50 | --- |
| 51 | |
| 52 | ## A->B |