Run code, architecture, systems, or proposed changes through a panel of world-class engineering perspectives. Each panelist reads the ACTUAL source files before judging. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: review code quality, get expert opinions, assess architecture decisions, evaluate a refactor plan, critique a design, run something 'through expert eyes', get a 'Linus review', assess quality against the best projects, compare to top OSS standards, or get unbiased multi-perspective feedback. Also trigger for: 'what would X think of this', 'is this good enough', 'how does this compare to the best', 'give me honest feedback', 'tear this apart', 'brutal review', 'no-bullshit assessment'. This is for EVALUATING existing code or proposals — not for writing new code or extracting system structure (use system-layer-extraction for that).
How to install expert-panel-review?
farzammohammadi/the-engineer/expert-panel-review
$npx -y skills add farzammohammadi/the-engineer --skill expert-panel-reviewInstalls into the current project.
›Prefer a prompt? Paste this to your agent
Run `npx skills use "https://github.com/farzammohammadi/the-engineer" --skill "farzammohammadi/the-engineer/expert-panel-review"` and follow the generated skill instructions now. Read its complete output, redirecting it to a temporary file first if necessary. Resolve relative paths from the supporting-files directory it provides.
Use the skills in "https://github.com/farzammohammadi/the-engineer" that are relevant to the current task. Run `npx skills add "https://github.com/farzammohammadi/the-engineer"` and select the relevant skills, then follow their instructions.
Related
6 picksType
- improve-codebase-architectureScan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.Jul 2026
- domain-modelingBuild and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when the user wants to pin down domain terminology or a ubiquitous language, record an architectural decision,…Jul 2026
- caveman-reviewUltra-compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix.Jul 2026
- codebase-designShared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a…Jul 2026
- code-reviewReview the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding…Jul 2026
- resolving-merge-conflictsUse when you need to resolve an in-progress git merge/rebase conflict.Jul 2026
