review-debt

Name: review-debt
Author: gtrabanco

32installs2forks

How to install review-debt?

gtrabanco/agentic-workflow/review-debt

$npx -y skills add gtrabanco/agentic-workflow --skill review-debt

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Internal tech-debt review pass of the agentic-workflow review pack — composed in-turn by review-change and product-audit; not a menu entry. Inventories shortcuts, duplication, stale abstractions and missing coverage on the changed surface, each with a re-trigger condition. Findin

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# Review Tech Debt (internal)
2
3	Composed by `review-change` / `product-audit` within their conversation — on any
4	agent, follow this file inline as the routed step. **Findings only; never edits,
5	never refactors.**
6
7	## Scope
8
9	The diff or path/glob the caller passes; default the current change vs the
10	default branch. State the scope at the top of the returned table.
11
12	## Checklist (evaluate EVERY item — none is optional; n/a must be stated)
13
14	✓ Every TODO/FIXME/HACK in the diff is inventoried (file:line + what it defers)
15	✓ Duplicated logic across the changed files and against existing helpers (cite both sides)
16	✓ Stale/orphaned abstractions the change leaves behind (a port with one adapter, a config no one reads)
17	✓ Dead code left by the change (replaced-but-not-removed paths)
18	✓ Complexity hotspots introduced (functions past ~40 lines or 3+ nesting levels — cite)
19	✓ Missing tests for behavior the change adds/alters (name the untested path)
20	✓ Workarounds that depend on external fixes (pin the upstream issue if known)
21	✓ Every finding carries a TRIGGER: the condition under which it must be paid (e.g. "3rd consumer appears", ">100k rows") — a debt item without a trigger is itself a finding
22
23	## Return exactly
24
25	```
26	REVIEW TECH DEBT — scope: <scope>
27
28	\| # \| Finding \| Sev \| Evidence \| Suggested fix \|
29	\|---\|---------\|-----\|----------\|---------------\|
30	\| 1 \| <what> \| critical\|major\|minor \| <file:line> \| <smallest action> \|
31
32	Checklist: <n> evaluated, <n> pass, <n> findings, <n> n/a (<which + why>)
33	Summary: <1-2 sentences>
34	Decision: PASS \| FAIL
35	```
36
37	For this pass, the Suggested fix column carries the TRIGGER — the condition
38	under which the debt must be paid — alongside the smallest action.
39
40	FAIL if any critical or major finding is open; PASS otherwise. Minor findings
41	never block — they route to the caller's triage step.
42
43	## Done when
44
45	- Every checklist item was evaluated with evidence (file:line or command output)
46	or explicitly marked n/a with the reason.
47	- The fixed-format block above is returned — nothing more, nothing less — and
48	no code was changed.

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type

review-debt

32installs2forks

View on GitHub

How to install review-debt?

gtrabanco/agentic-workflow/review-debt

$npx -y skills add gtrabanco/agentic-workflow --skill review-debt

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# Review Tech Debt (internal)
2
3	Composed by `review-change` / `product-audit` within their conversation — on any
4	agent, follow this file inline as the routed step. **Findings only; never edits,
5	never refactors.**
6
7	## Scope
8
9	The diff or path/glob the caller passes; default the current change vs the
10	default branch. State the scope at the top of the returned table.
11
12	## Checklist (evaluate EVERY item — none is optional; n/a must be stated)
13
14	✓ Every TODO/FIXME/HACK in the diff is inventoried (file:line + what it defers)
15	✓ Duplicated logic across the changed files and against existing helpers (cite both sides)
16	✓ Stale/orphaned abstractions the change leaves behind (a port with one adapter, a config no one reads)
17	✓ Dead code left by the change (replaced-but-not-removed paths)
18	✓ Complexity hotspots introduced (functions past ~40 lines or 3+ nesting levels — cite)
19	✓ Missing tests for behavior the change adds/alters (name the untested path)
20	✓ Workarounds that depend on external fixes (pin the upstream issue if known)
21	✓ Every finding carries a TRIGGER: the condition under which it must be paid (e.g. "3rd consumer appears", ">100k rows") — a debt item without a trigger is itself a finding
22
23	## Return exactly
24
25	```
26	REVIEW TECH DEBT — scope: <scope>
27
28	\| # \| Finding \| Sev \| Evidence \| Suggested fix \|
29	\|---\|---------\|-----\|----------\|---------------\|
30	\| 1 \| <what> \| critical\|major\|minor \| <file:line> \| <smallest action> \|
31
32	Checklist: <n> evaluated, <n> pass, <n> findings, <n> n/a (<which + why>)
33	Summary: <1-2 sentences>
34	Decision: PASS \| FAIL
35	```
36
37	For this pass, the Suggested fix column carries the TRIGGER — the condition
38	under which the debt must be paid — alongside the smallest action.
39
40	FAIL if any critical or major finding is open; PASS otherwise. Minor findings
41	never block — they route to the caller's triage step.
42
43	## Done when
44
45	- Every checklist item was evaluated with evidence (file:line or command output)
46	or explicitly marked n/a with the reason.
47	- The fixed-format block above is returned — nothing more, nothing less — and
48	no code was changed.

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type