Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.
$npx -y skills add k-dense-ai/claude-scientific-writer --skill peer-reviewInstalls into the current project.
Run `npx skills use "https://github.com/k-dense-ai/claude-scientific-writer" --skill "k-dense-ai/claude-scientific-writer/peer-review"` and follow the generated skill instructions now. Read its complete output, redirecting it to a temporary file first if necessary. Resolve relative paths from the supporting-files directory it provides.
Use the skills in "https://github.com/k-dense-ai/claude-scientific-writer" that are relevant to the current task. Run `npx skills add "https://github.com/k-dense-ai/claude-scientific-writer"` and select the relevant skills, then follow their instructions.