mmthebest/research-architect
9 skills
$npx skills add mmthebest/research-architectSkillInstalls
research-architectUse when a user needs the end-to-end Research Architect workflow to turn a raw idea, user-designated accessible target reference paper, partial research materials, results, or an existing draft into aresearch-architect-auditUse when reviewing, revising, or deciding whether to complete a Research Architect draft, especially when its reference adaptation, design, evidence, citations, claim boundaries, copying risk, or missresearch-architect-brainstormUse when a user needs distinct, feasible Research Architect research-question options from a raw topic, available materials, constraints, and—when available—transferable logic from a target reference research-architect-citationUse when a Research Architect project or existing draft needs claim-level literature support for background, positioning, methods, interpretation, limitations, or revision, rather than broad generic lresearch-architect-designUse when a Research Architect candidate research spine and approved exemplar adaptation need to become a feasible, field-appropriate study design, analysis plan, validation strategy, and user action presearch-architect-draftUse when a Research Architect project has an evidence-ready spine, evidence and claim trail, citation support, and adapted reference logic that need to become a field-appropriate first draft or an audresearch-architect-evidenceUse when executed research materials, results, observations, analyses, or draft claims need to become a Research Architect evidence bank, claim register, evidence-display plan, and bounded interpretatresearch-architect-intakeUse when starting or resuming a Research Architect project—including an existing draft that needs review—and you need to capture target reference papers, project materials, constraints, verification sresearch-architect-literatureUse when a Research Architect project needs accessible target-reference papers analyzed for transferable research logic, or candidate questions positioned against literature, gaps, evidence standards,