$npx -y skills add ncklrs/startup-os-skills --skill competitive-strategistExpert competitive intelligence and strategy guidance for B2B/SaaS companies. Use when conducting competitive research, creating battlecards, analyzing win/loss data, building market landscape maps, positioning against alternatives, handling competitive objections, writing compar
| 1 | # Competitive Strategist |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Expert competitive intelligence and positioning guidance for winning in crowded markets — from research methodologies to sales enablement and everything in between. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | ## Philosophy |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Competitive strategy isn't about copying competitors or tearing them down: |
| 8 | |
| 9 | 1. **Know yourself first** — You can't position against others until you know your own strengths |
| 10 | 2. **Focus on customers, not competitors** — What they need matters more than what rivals do |
| 11 | 3. **Be honest** — Lies and FUD destroy credibility faster than any competitor |
| 12 | 4. **Stay current** — Markets move fast; stale intel costs deals |
| 13 | |
| 14 | ## How This Skill Works |
| 15 | |
| 16 | When invoked, apply the guidelines in `rules/` organized by: |
| 17 | |
| 18 | - `research-*` — Competitive research methodologies and intelligence gathering |
| 19 | - `analysis-*` — Win/loss analysis and market landscape mapping |
| 20 | - `battlecard-*` — Battlecard creation, structure, and maintenance |
| 21 | - `positioning-*` — Positioning against alternatives and differentiation |
| 22 | - `messaging-*` — Competitive messaging and objection handling |
| 23 | - `enablement-*` — Sales enablement for competitive situations |
| 24 | - `monitoring-*` — Competitive monitoring systems and alerts |
| 25 | |
| 26 | ## Core Frameworks |
| 27 | |
| 28 | ### The Competitive Intelligence Cycle |
| 29 | |
| 30 | ``` |
| 31 | ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ |
| 32 | │ │ |
| 33 | │ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │ |
| 34 | │ │ GATHER │───▶│ ANALYZE │───▶│ SHARE │ │ |
| 35 | │ │ (Intel) │ │ (Insight)│ │ (Enable) │ │ |
| 36 | │ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ │ |
| 37 | │ ▲ │ │ |
| 38 | │ │ ┌──────────┐ │ │ |
| 39 | │ └──────────│ UPDATE │◀─────────┘ │ |
| 40 | │ │ (Iterate)│ │ |
| 41 | │ └──────────┘ │ |
| 42 | │ │ |
| 43 | └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ |
| 44 | ``` |
| 45 | |
| 46 | ### Competitive Positioning Matrix |
| 47 | |
| 48 | | Positioning Type | When to Use | Key Approach | |
| 49 | |------------------|-------------|--------------| |
| 50 | | **Head-to-head** | You're stronger on key dimensions | Direct comparison | |
| 51 | | **Niche down** | Competitor owns general category | Own a specific segment | |
| 52 | | **Reframe** | Competitor's strength is irrelevant | Change the criteria | |
| 53 | | **Leapfrog** | New capability they can't match | Future-oriented vision | |
| 54 | | **Coexist** | Different jobs to be done | Complement, don't compete | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | ### Competitor Tiers |
| 57 | |
| 58 | | Tier | Description | Monitoring Frequency | Depth of Analysis | |
| 59 | |------|-------------|---------------------|-------------------| |
| 60 | | **Primary** | Direct competitors, same ICP | Weekly | Deep battlecards | |
| 61 | | **Secondary** | Adjacent solutions, partial overlap | Monthly | Overview cards | |
| 62 | | **Emerging** | Startups, potential disruptors | Quarterly | Watch list | |
| 63 | | **Alternatives** | Status quo, DIY, spreadsheets | Ongoing | Pain point mapping | |
| 64 | |
| 65 | ### Win/Loss Analysis Framework |
| 66 | |
| 67 | ``` |
| 68 | Deal Outcome |
| 69 | │ |
| 70 | ├── Won Against Competitor |
| 71 | │ ├── What differentiated us? |
| 72 | │ ├── What did they say about competitor? |
| 73 | │ └── What would have changed their mind? |
| 74 | │ |
| 75 | └── Lost to Competitor |
| 76 | ├── What was the deciding factor? |
| 77 | ├── Where did we fall short? |
| 78 | └── What could we have done differently? |
| 79 | ``` |
| 80 | |
| 81 | ### The Battlecard Structure |
| 82 | |
| 83 | | Section | Purpose | Update Frequency | |
| 84 | |---------|---------|------------------| |
| 85 | | **Overview** | Quick context, what they do | Quarterly | |
| 86 | | **Positioning** | How we win, key differentiators | Monthly | |
| 87 | | **Landmines** | Questions to ask that expose weaknesses | As discovered | |
| 88 | | **Objection Handling** | Responses to "Why not [competitor]?" | As encountered | |
| 89 | | **Proof Points** | Customer quotes, case studies | As available | |
| 90 | | **Pricing Intel** | Known pricing, packaging | As discovered | |
| 91 | |
| 92 | ## Competitive Response Spectrum |
| 93 | |
| 94 | | Situation | Response | Example | |
| 95 | |-----------|----------|---------| |
| 96 | | **They launch feature you have** | Emphasize experience, depth | "We've had this for 2 years, here's what we've learned" | |
| 97 | | **They launch feature you don't** | Roadmap or reframe | "We're focused on X because customers told us Y matters more" | |
| 98 | | **They cut price** | Hold on value | "You get what you pay for — here's the TCO comparison" | |
| 99 | | **They spread FUD** | Correct with facts | "That's not accurate — here's the truth wit |