$npx -y skills add ncklrs/startup-os-skills --skill support-operationsExpert support operations guidance for customer service excellence. Use when designing ticket management systems, creating SLA policies, building support tier structures (L1/L2/L3), optimizing knowledge bases, defining severity levels and escalation procedures, implementing suppo
| 1 | # Support Operations |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Strategic support operations expertise for customer-facing teams — from ticket management and SLA design to escalation workflows and self-service optimization. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | ## Philosophy |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Great support isn't about closing tickets fast. It's about **solving customer problems permanently** while building scalable systems. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | The best support operations teams: |
| 10 | 1. **Prevent before they support** — Self-service and proactive help reduce ticket volume |
| 11 | 2. **Measure what drives loyalty** — Resolution quality beats response speed |
| 12 | 3. **Escalate with context** — Every handoff preserves customer history |
| 13 | 4. **Feed insights upstream** — Support data drives product and success improvements |
| 14 | |
| 15 | ## How This Skill Works |
| 16 | |
| 17 | When invoked, apply the guidelines in `rules/` organized by: |
| 18 | |
| 19 | - `ticket-*` — Ticket management, prioritization, queue optimization |
| 20 | - `sla-*` — SLA design, compliance monitoring, escalation triggers |
| 21 | - `tier-*` — Support tier structure, skill-based routing, specialization |
| 22 | - `knowledge-*` — Knowledge base strategy, self-service, deflection |
| 23 | - `metrics-*` — CSAT, FRT, TTR, FCR, quality scoring |
| 24 | - `escalation-*` — Severity definitions, escalation paths, incident management |
| 25 | - `tooling-*` — Support stack optimization, integrations, automation |
| 26 | - `feedback-*` — Support-to-CS handoffs, product feedback loops, voice of customer |
| 27 | |
| 28 | ## Core Frameworks |
| 29 | |
| 30 | ### The Support Operations Hierarchy |
| 31 | |
| 32 | | Level | Focus | Metrics | Owner | |
| 33 | |-------|-------|---------|-------| |
| 34 | | **Tickets** | Individual resolution | Handle time, CSAT | Agents | |
| 35 | | **Queue** | Flow optimization | Wait time, backlog | Team leads | |
| 36 | | **Channel** | Channel effectiveness | Deflection, containment | Managers | |
| 37 | | **Operations** | System performance | Cost per ticket, NPS | Directors | |
| 38 | | **Strategy** | Business impact | Retention, expansion | VP/C-level | |
| 39 | |
| 40 | ### The Support Tier Model |
| 41 | |
| 42 | ``` |
| 43 | ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ |
| 44 | │ TIER 3 (L3) │ |
| 45 | │ Engineering escalation, code-level issues, custom development │ |
| 46 | │ Target: <5% of tickets | SLA: Best effort │ |
| 47 | ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ |
| 48 | │ TIER 2 (L2) │ |
| 49 | │ Technical specialists, complex troubleshooting, integrations │ |
| 50 | │ Target: 15-25% of tickets | SLA: 4-8 hours │ |
| 51 | ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ |
| 52 | │ TIER 1 (L1) │ |
| 53 | │ First response, common issues, documentation guidance │ |
| 54 | │ Target: 60-80% resolution | SLA: 15-60 minutes │ |
| 55 | ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ |
| 56 | │ SELF-SERVICE (L0) │ |
| 57 | │ Knowledge base, chatbots, community forums, in-app help │ |
| 58 | │ Target: 30-50% deflection | SLA: Instant │ |
| 59 | └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ |
| 60 | ``` |
| 61 | |
| 62 | ### Ticket Priority Matrix |
| 63 | |
| 64 | | Priority | Business Impact | Response SLA | Resolution SLA | Examples | |
| 65 | |----------|-----------------|--------------|----------------|----------| |
| 66 | | **P1 Critical** | Complete outage, data loss | 15 min | 4 hours | System down, security breach | |
| 67 | | **P2 High** | Major feature broken | 1 hour | 8 hours | Key workflow blocked | |
| 68 | | **P3 Medium** | Feature impaired | 4 hours | 24 hours | Partial functionality | |
| 69 | | **P4 Low** | Minor issue, cosmetic | 8 hours | 72 hours | UI bug, minor inconvenience | |
| 70 | | **P5 Request** | Feature request, how-to | 24 hours | 5 days | Enhancement, training | |
| 71 | |
| 72 | ### Support Metrics Framework |
| 73 | |
| 74 | | Metric | Definition | Target | Warning | |
| 75 | |--------|------------|--------|---------| |
| 76 | | **CSAT** | Customer satisfaction score | 90%+ | <85% | |
| 77 | | **FRT** | First response time | <1 hour | >4 hours | |
| 78 | | **TTR** | Time to resolution | <24 hours | >72 hours | |
| 79 | | **FCR** | First contact resolution | 70%+ | <50% | |
| 80 | | **NPS** | Net promoter score | 30+ | <10 | |
| 81 | | **Ticket Volume** | Tickets per 100 customers | 5-15 | >25 | |
| 82 | | **Deflection Rate** | Self-service success | 30-50% | <20% | |
| 83 | | **Escalation Rate** | Tickets escalated | 10-20% | >30% | |
| 84 | | **Reopen Rate** | Tickets reopened | <5% | >10% | |
| 85 | | **Agent Utilization** | Productive time | 70-80% | <60% or >90% | |
| 86 | |
| 87 | ### The Ticket Lifecycle |
| 88 | |
| 89 | ``` |
| 90 | ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ |
| 91 | │ |