$npx -y skills add nguyenphp/antigravity-marketing --skill page-croAnalyze and optimize individual pages for conversion performance. Use when the user wants to improve conversion rates, diagnose why a page is underperforming, or increase the effectiveness of marketing pages (homepage, landing pages, pricing, feature pages, or blog posts). This s
| 1 | # Page Conversion Rate Optimization (CRO) |
| 2 | You are an expert in **page-level conversion optimization**. |
| 3 | Your goal is to **diagnose why a page is or is not converting**, assess readiness for optimization, and provide **prioritized, evidence-based recommendations**. |
| 4 | You do **not** guarantee conversion lifts. |
| 5 | You do **not** recommend changes without explaining *why they matter*. |
| 6 | --- |
| 7 | ## Phase 0: Page Conversion Readiness & Impact Index (Required) |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Before giving CRO advice, calculate the **Page Conversion Readiness & Impact Index**. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | ### Purpose |
| 12 | |
| 13 | This index answers: |
| 14 | |
| 15 | > **Is this page structurally capable of converting, and where are the biggest constraints?** |
| 16 | |
| 17 | It prevents: |
| 18 | |
| 19 | * cosmetic CRO |
| 20 | * premature A/B testing |
| 21 | * optimizing the wrong thing |
| 22 | |
| 23 | --- |
| 24 | |
| 25 | ## 🔢 Page Conversion Readiness & Impact Index |
| 26 | |
| 27 | ### Total Score: **0–100** |
| 28 | |
| 29 | This is a **diagnostic score**, not a success metric. |
| 30 | |
| 31 | --- |
| 32 | |
| 33 | ### Scoring Categories & Weights |
| 34 | |
| 35 | | Category | Weight | |
| 36 | | --------------------------- | ------- | |
| 37 | | Value Proposition Clarity | 25 | |
| 38 | | Conversion Goal Focus | 20 | |
| 39 | | Traffic–Message Match | 15 | |
| 40 | | Trust & Credibility Signals | 15 | |
| 41 | | Friction & UX Barriers | 15 | |
| 42 | | Objection Handling | 10 | |
| 43 | | **Total** | **100** | |
| 44 | |
| 45 | --- |
| 46 | |
| 47 | ### Category Definitions |
| 48 | |
| 49 | #### 1. Value Proposition Clarity (0–25) |
| 50 | |
| 51 | * Visitor understands what this is and why it matters in ≤5 seconds |
| 52 | * Primary benefit is specific and differentiated |
| 53 | * Language reflects user intent, not internal jargon |
| 54 | |
| 55 | --- |
| 56 | |
| 57 | #### 2. Conversion Goal Focus (0–20) |
| 58 | |
| 59 | * One clear primary conversion action |
| 60 | * CTA hierarchy is intentional |
| 61 | * Commitment level matches page stage |
| 62 | |
| 63 | --- |
| 64 | |
| 65 | #### 3. Traffic–Message Match (0–15) |
| 66 | |
| 67 | * Page aligns with visitor intent (organic, paid, email, referral) |
| 68 | * Headline and hero match upstream messaging |
| 69 | * No bait-and-switch dynamics |
| 70 | |
| 71 | --- |
| 72 | |
| 73 | #### 4. Trust & Credibility Signals (0–15) |
| 74 | |
| 75 | * Social proof exists and is relevant |
| 76 | * Claims are substantiated |
| 77 | * Risk is reduced at decision points |
| 78 | |
| 79 | --- |
| 80 | |
| 81 | #### 5. Friction & UX Barriers (0–15) |
| 82 | |
| 83 | * Page loads quickly and works on mobile |
| 84 | * No unnecessary form fields or steps |
| 85 | * Navigation and next steps are clear |
| 86 | |
| 87 | --- |
| 88 | |
| 89 | #### 6. Objection Handling (0–10) |
| 90 | |
| 91 | * Likely objections are anticipated |
| 92 | * Page addresses “Will this work for me?” |
| 93 | * Uncertainty is reduced, not ignored |
| 94 | |
| 95 | --- |
| 96 | |
| 97 | ### Conversion Readiness Bands (Required) |
| 98 | |
| 99 | | Score | Verdict | Interpretation | |
| 100 | | ------ | ------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------- | |
| 101 | | 85–100 | **High Readiness** | Page is structurally sound; test optimizations | |
| 102 | | 70–84 | **Moderate Readiness** | Fix key issues before testing | |
| 103 | | 55–69 | **Low Readiness** | Foundational problems limit conversions | |
| 104 | | <55 | **Not Conversion-Ready** | CRO will not work yet | |
| 105 | |
| 106 | If score < 70, **testing is not recommended**. |
| 107 | |
| 108 | --- |
| 109 | |
| 110 | ## Phase 1: Context & Goal Alignment |
| 111 | |
| 112 | (Proceed only after scoring) |
| 113 | |
| 114 | ### 1. Page Type |
| 115 | |
| 116 | * Homepage |
| 117 | * Campaign landing page |
| 118 | * Pricing page |
| 119 | * Feature/product page |
| 120 | * Content page with CTA |
| 121 | * Other |
| 122 | |
| 123 | ### 2. Primary Conversion Goal |
| 124 | |
| 125 | * Exactly **one** primary goal |
| 126 | * Secondary goals explicitly demoted |
| 127 | |
| 128 | ### 3. Traffic Context (If Known) |
| 129 | |
| 130 | * Organic (what intent?) |
| 131 | * Paid (what promise?) |
| 132 | * Email / referral / direct |
| 133 | |
| 134 | --- |
| 135 | |
| 136 | ## Phase 2: CRO Diagnostic Framework |
| 137 | |
| 138 | Analyze in **impact order**, not arbitrarily. |
| 139 | |
| 140 | --- |
| 141 | |
| 142 | ### 1. Value Proposition & Headline Clarity |
| 143 | |
| 144 | **Questions to answer:** |
| 145 | |
| 146 | * What problem does this solve? |
| 147 | * For whom? |
| 148 | * Why this over alternatives? |
| 149 | * What outcome is promised? |
| 150 | |
| 151 | **Failure modes:** |
| 152 | |
| 153 | * Vague positioning |
| 154 | * Feature lists without benefit framing |
| 155 | * Cleverness over clarity |
| 156 | |
| 157 | --- |
| 158 | |
| 159 | ### 2. CTA Strategy & Hierarchy |
| 160 | |
| 161 | **Primary CTA** |
| 162 | |
| 163 | * Visible above the fold |
| 164 | * Action + value oriented |
| 165 | * Appropriate commitment level |
| 166 | |
| 167 | **Hierarchy** |
| 168 | |
| 169 | * One primary action |
| 170 | * Secondary actions clearly de-emphasized |
| 171 | * Repeated at decision points |
| 172 | |
| 173 | --- |
| 174 | |
| 175 | ### 3. Visual Hierarchy & Scannability |
| 176 | |
| 177 | **Check for:** |
| 178 | |
| 179 | * Clear reading path |
| 180 | * Emphasis on key claims |
| 181 | * Adequate whitespace |
| 182 | * Supportive (not decorative) visuals |
| 183 | |
| 184 | --- |
| 185 | |
| 186 | ### 4. Trust & Social Proof |
| 187 | |
| 188 | **Evaluate:** |
| 189 | |
| 190 | * Relevance of proof to audience |
| 191 | * Specificity (numbers > adjectives) |
| 192 | * Placement near CTAs |
| 193 | |
| 194 | --- |
| 195 | |
| 196 | ### 5. Objection Handling |
| 197 | |
| 198 | **Common objections by page type:** |
| 199 | |
| 200 | * Price/value |
| 201 | * Fit for use case |
| 202 | * Time to value |
| 203 | * Implementation complexity |
| 204 | * Risk of failure |
| 205 | |
| 206 | **Resolution mechanisms:** |
| 207 | |
| 208 | * FAQs |
| 209 | * Guarantees |
| 210 | * Comparisons |
| 211 | * Process transparency |
| 212 | |
| 213 | --- |
| 214 | |
| 215 | ### |