food-paper

Name: food-paper
Author: PangenomeAI

16stars1forks

How to install food-paper?

pangenomeai/academic-skills-food-nutrition/food-paper

$npx -y skills add PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition --skill food-paper

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Multi-subagent manuscript system for food & nutrition science covering the whole research process: understand the field, frame research questions, curate and analyze data, run statistics, build figures and tables, construct the discussion, draft, polish, and self-review — journal

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# Food-Paper — Whole-Process Manuscript System for Food & Nutrition Science
2
3	Take a food/nutrition study from data and idea to a submission-ready, journal-
4	formatted manuscript, using a team of subagents for each stage of the research
5	and writing process. Original work; architecture informed by open community
6	paper-writing and Nature-style skills (see the repo README Acknowledgements).
7
8	## First move — resolve the target journal (once)
9	Before drafting, load `journal-selector/SKILL.md` (a shared procedure, not an
10	installed skill) and follow it — it **asks the author which journal
11	they are targeting (they may answer 'generic' for APA 7.0** defaults). Do this
12	once: record the resolved journal and its constraints and reuse them for every
13	subagent and stage — do not ask again. Re-run `journal-selector` only if the
14	author asks to switch journals, or reuse the choice already resolved by
15	`food-pipeline`/an earlier turn. The constraints govern structure, word/abstract
16	limits, reference style, and the figure spec passed to `food-figure`.
17
18	## Modes
19	- full (default) — the whole pipeline: field → questions → data/stats → figures → argument → draft → polish → self-review.
20	- plan — Socratic planning of the paper chapter by chapter (no full draft).
21	- outline — detailed outline + evidence map only.
22	- section — draft or rewrite one section (intro/methods/results/discussion/abstract).
23	- stats — statistical analysis plan/execution guidance only.
24	- revise — revise against an existing review (a `food-review` report and/or margin comments on a Word file). Edit the original `.docx` with Tracked Changes (do not start a fresh copy), resolving each comment. Inside `food-pipeline`: update the existing Review & Response Report (`.docx`) in place with each item's response — no separate response letter. Standalone (real journal reviewers): produce a point-by-point response letter as a new Word document. All deliverables are `.docx`, never Markdown. See `references/revision-response.md`.
25	- format-convert — convert a draft to the target journal's structure + reference style; output Markdown, LaTeX (.tex), or DOCX, and build a PDF via Pandoc or `latexmk` (see `references/latex-guide.md`). Yes — this skill can prepare and edit LaTeX drafts. When the source is a Word file, preserve EndNote/Zotero/Mendeley citation fields (`references/word-field-codes.md`) — don't flatten field codes into text.
26	- polish — language editing to publication-quality English and removal of AI writing tells (`polisher` runs `references/human-writing.md`): inflated significance, "-ing" tack-ons, vague attribution ("studies have shown" → a real citation), stock AI vocabulary, "serves as" → "is", filler, hedge stacking, generic upbeat endings — then the two-pass check "what still reads as machine-written?". Keeps calibrated hedging, passive Methods, and journal-mandated form; never changes a number, claim scope, or citation. Good for non-native-English drafts and for anything AI helped write.
27
28	## Subagent team (dispatch via the Agent tool; independent stages run in parallel)
29	\| # \| Subagent \| Stage of the research process \|
30	\|---\|---\|---\|
31	\| 1 \|

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type

food-paper

16stars1forks

View on GitHub

How to install food-paper?

pangenomeai/academic-skills-food-nutrition/food-paper

$npx -y skills add PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition --skill food-paper

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# Food-Paper — Whole-Process Manuscript System for Food & Nutrition Science
2
3	Take a food/nutrition study from data and idea to a submission-ready, journal-
4	formatted manuscript, using a team of subagents for each stage of the research
5	and writing process. Original work; architecture informed by open community
6	paper-writing and Nature-style skills (see the repo README Acknowledgements).
7
8	## First move — resolve the target journal (once)
9	Before drafting, load `journal-selector/SKILL.md` (a shared procedure, not an
10	installed skill) and follow it — it **asks the author which journal
11	they are targeting (they may answer 'generic' for APA 7.0** defaults). Do this
12	once: record the resolved journal and its constraints and reuse them for every
13	subagent and stage — do not ask again. Re-run `journal-selector` only if the
14	author asks to switch journals, or reuse the choice already resolved by
15	`food-pipeline`/an earlier turn. The constraints govern structure, word/abstract
16	limits, reference style, and the figure spec passed to `food-figure`.
17
18	## Modes
19	- full (default) — the whole pipeline: field → questions → data/stats → figures → argument → draft → polish → self-review.
20	- plan — Socratic planning of the paper chapter by chapter (no full draft).
21	- outline — detailed outline + evidence map only.
22	- section — draft or rewrite one section (intro/methods/results/discussion/abstract).
23	- stats — statistical analysis plan/execution guidance only.
24	- revise — revise against an existing review (a `food-review` report and/or margin comments on a Word file). Edit the original `.docx` with Tracked Changes (do not start a fresh copy), resolving each comment. Inside `food-pipeline`: update the existing Review & Response Report (`.docx`) in place with each item's response — no separate response letter. Standalone (real journal reviewers): produce a point-by-point response letter as a new Word document. All deliverables are `.docx`, never Markdown. See `references/revision-response.md`.
25	- format-convert — convert a draft to the target journal's structure + reference style; output Markdown, LaTeX (.tex), or DOCX, and build a PDF via Pandoc or `latexmk` (see `references/latex-guide.md`). Yes — this skill can prepare and edit LaTeX drafts. When the source is a Word file, preserve EndNote/Zotero/Mendeley citation fields (`references/word-field-codes.md`) — don't flatten field codes into text.
26	- polish — language editing to publication-quality English and removal of AI writing tells (`polisher` runs `references/human-writing.md`): inflated significance, "-ing" tack-ons, vague attribution ("studies have shown" → a real citation), stock AI vocabulary, "serves as" → "is", filler, hedge stacking, generic upbeat endings — then the two-pass check "what still reads as machine-written?". Keeps calibrated hedging, passive Methods, and journal-mandated form; never changes a number, claim scope, or citation. Good for non-native-English drafts and for anything AI helped write.
27
28	## Subagent team (dispatch via the Agent tool; independent stages run in parallel)
29	\| # \| Subagent \| Stage of the research process \|
30	\|---\|---\|---\|
31	\| 1 \|

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type