$npx -y skills add richard-kim-79/archora-skills --skill draftWrites a complete IMRaD-structured academic paper draft (Abstract, Introduction, Related Work, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, References) from the user's notes, documents, and wiki content. Use when the user asks to write a paper, create a manuscript, generate a draft,
| 1 | # Paper Draft Generation |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Generate a complete IMRaD-structured academic paper draft from research notes and documents. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | ## IMRaD Structure |
| 6 | |
| 7 | | Section | Purpose | Length | |
| 8 | |---------|---------|--------| |
| 9 | | **Abstract** | Background, objective, methods, findings, conclusions | 250–300 words | |
| 10 | | **Introduction** | Problem, motivation, gap, contribution | 400–600 words | |
| 11 | | **Related Work** | Prior literature organized by theme | 500–800 words | |
| 12 | | **Methods** | How the research was/will be conducted | 400–600 words | |
| 13 | | **Results** | What was found (or projected findings) | 300–500 words | |
| 14 | | **Discussion** | Interpretation, implications, limitations | 400–600 words | |
| 15 | | **Conclusion** | Summary, contributions, future work | 200–300 words | |
| 16 | | **References** | All cited sources | As needed | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | ## Workflow |
| 19 | |
| 20 | 1. **Gather content** — read all provided notes, wiki pages, and documents |
| 21 | 2. **Identify the core contribution** — what is new and why does it matter? |
| 22 | 3. **Map citations** — track which sources support which claims |
| 23 | 4. **Draft section by section** — follow IMRaD order |
| 24 | 5. **Add inline citations** — use `[Author, Year]` or `[Source Title]` format |
| 25 | 6. **Flag gaps** — mark sections needing real data with `> ⚠️ [PROJECTED — add empirical data]` |
| 26 | |
| 27 | ## Citation format |
| 28 | |
| 29 | Use the actual title or author of notes/documents you read: |
| 30 | |
| 31 | ```markdown |
| 32 | Predictive coding theory proposes... [Rao & Ballard, 1999] |
| 33 | ``` |
| 34 | |
| 35 | At the end, add a References section listing all cited sources. |
| 36 | |
| 37 | ## Handling missing data |
| 38 | |
| 39 | When the research doesn't have empirical results yet, write projected results based on the hypotheses — but clearly mark them: |
| 40 | |
| 41 | ```markdown |
| 42 | > ⚠️ **Projected Results** — Replace with actual experimental data before submission. |
| 43 | |
| 44 | Based on the experimental design, we expect... |
| 45 | ``` |
| 46 | |
| 47 | ## Quality checklist |
| 48 | |
| 49 | - [ ] Abstract covers all 5 components (background, objective, methods, findings, conclusions) |
| 50 | - [ ] Introduction ends with a clear statement of contribution |
| 51 | - [ ] Every major claim has an inline citation |
| 52 | - [ ] Methods section is specific enough to reproduce |
| 53 | - [ ] Discussion addresses alternative interpretations |
| 54 | - [ ] Limitations section is honest, not defensive |