$npx -y skills add rlaope/oh-my-hermes --skill agent-ops-review[omh] Hermes agent ops review workflow: help managers inspect AI-agent progress, blockers, quality gates, and throughput levers.
| 1 | # Agent Ops Review |
| 2 | |
| 3 | This is a Hermes-native `agent-ops-review` workflow skill. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | ## Why This Exists |
| 6 | |
| 7 | `agent-ops-review` exists so Hermes users can ask for this workflow in chat and receive a structured, evidence-bounded OMH operating surface instead of ad hoc narration. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | ## Do Not Use When |
| 10 | |
| 11 | - The request is already handled by a narrower explicit skill with stronger evidence. |
| 12 | - The user asks OMH to secretly run external platforms, connectors, schedulers, file exports, or runtime agents. |
| 13 | - The only safe answer is to ask for missing authority, credentials, target, or observed evidence first. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | ## Examples |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Good example: |
| 18 | |
| 19 | - Prompt: agent-ops-review show quality, blockers, and throughput for AI-agent work. |
| 20 | - Expected behavior: Produce `prepare_agent_ops_review` with required context, wrapper actions, and not-evidence boundaries. |
| 21 | - Why: The prompt names a real workflow surface that Hermes can orchestrate without hiding execution. |
| 22 | |
| 23 | Bad example: |
| 24 | |
| 25 | - Prompt: agent-ops-review claim Codex finished and CI passed because a handoff exists. |
| 26 | - Expected behavior: Report the missing observed evidence or authority instead of claiming the external step happened. |
| 27 | - Why: Prepared OMH guidance is not platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence. |
| 28 | |
| 29 | ## Completion Checklist |
| 30 | |
| 31 | - The local command, managed path, config surface, and state artifact inspected are named. |
| 32 | - Blocking issues, warnings, and optional surfaces are separated. |
| 33 | - The next repair action is explicit and does not claim a reload or runtime observation. |
| 34 | |
| 35 | ## Recovery Notes |
| 36 | |
| 37 | - If a managed path or config key is missing, route to setup/update repair instead of editing hidden state. |
| 38 | - If a reload or plugin load was not observed, keep the diagnostic result as local health evidence only. |
| 39 | |
| 40 | ## OMH Context Rail |
| 41 | |
| 42 | - This skill is part of OMH's Hermes workflow layer, not a standalone executor. |
| 43 | - Product context: OMH is a Hermes-native workflow pack: choose skills, shape work, prepare artifacts, show status, and hand off with evidence boundaries. |
| 44 | - Current lane: **Automation and status** (`achievements`, `workspace-audit`, `production-audit`, `automation-blueprint`, `github-event-ops`, `agent-board`, `gateway-intent-card`, `voice-operator`, `+26 more`) - schedules, status, health, and ops review. |
| 45 | - If the user intent belongs to another OMH lane, hand back to `oh-my-hermes` or name the adjacent workflow instead of force-fitting this skill. |
| 46 | - Cross-skill context: every OMH skill: match lane; generic tool can render or execute. |
| 47 | - Generic-tool checkpoint: image->img-summary; frontend->frontend/a11y/visual-qa; paper->paper-learning; content->content-operator; media->media-input-operator; file->materials-package; search->web-research; live->live-info-operator; audit->workspace/production/security; failures->build-failure; verify->verification-gate; code->codegraph/onboarding/ultraprocess. |
| 48 | - Coverage: Every generated workflow skill carries this rail. |
| 49 | - Normal users talk to Hermes; OMH CLI is infra. |
| 50 | - Boundary: Prepared OMH routing, cards, handoffs, or artifacts are not observed execution, image generation, delivery, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence. |
| 51 | |
| 52 | ## Use When |
| 53 | |
| 54 | Use when Hermes should explain AI-agent work: quality gates, progress, blockers, next actions, and throughput. |
| 55 | |
| 56 | Strong routing signals: `agent-ops-review`, `agent ops review`, `agent productivity`, `operator productivity`, `manager view`, `quality dashboard`, `throughput review`, `agent work quality`, `coding progress quality`, `coding progress`, `where is codex`, `what's going on`, `status update please`, `what are you doing`, `what are you working on`, `where are we`, `今何してる`, `现在在做什么`, `qué está pasando`, `qu'est-ce qui se passe`, `was ist los`, `ai agent manager`, `관리자 입장`, `Codex 작업`, `Codex 작업이 어디까지`, `코덱스 작업`, `작업이 어디까지`, `진행됐는지`, `진행되었는지`, `처리량`, `작업 품질`, `진행상황`, `무슨일이노`, `뭔일임`, `무슨 일이야`, `뭐해`, `지금 뭐 하고 있어`, `작업상황 브리핑`, `어디까지 됐어`, `리서치 코딩 리뷰` |
| 57 | |
| 58 | ## Catalog Metadata |
| 59 | |
| 60 | Category: `operator` |
| 61 | Phase: `manager-review` |
| 62 | Hermes role: `tracker` |
| 63 | Quality tier: `workflow-surface-gated` |
| 64 | |
| 65 | Quality bar: |
| 66 | |
| 67 | - Name the user-facing workflow objective, required context, next action, and stop condition. |
| 68 | - Separate prepared guidance from observed platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence. |
| 69 | - Expose missing tools, credentials, targets, or observations as user-visible gaps. |
| 70 | |
| 71 | Handoff policy: |
| 72 | |
| 73 | Keep this as Hermes-facing orchestration guidance first. Prepare executor, connector, gateway, or host-runtime handoff only when the user accepts that next step and observed evidence can be recorded. |
| 74 | |
| 75 | Required inputs: |
| 76 | |
| 77 | - user request |
| 78 | - target context |
| 79 | - delivery or status |