$npx -y skills add rlaope/oh-my-hermes --skill instinct-ledger[omh] Instinct Ledger workflow: turn repeated project or cross-project lessons into atomic, confidence-scored instinct candidates with scoped promotion and export boundaries.
| 1 | # Instinct Ledger |
| 2 | |
| 3 | This is a Hermes-native `instinct-ledger` workflow skill. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | ## Why This Exists |
| 6 | |
| 7 | `instinct-ledger` exists so Hermes users can ask for this workflow in chat and receive a structured, evidence-bounded OMH operating surface instead of ad hoc narration. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | ## Do Not Use When |
| 10 | |
| 11 | - The request is already handled by a narrower explicit skill with stronger evidence. |
| 12 | - The user asks OMH to secretly run external platforms, connectors, schedulers, file exports, or runtime agents. |
| 13 | - The only safe answer is to ask for missing authority, credentials, target, or observed evidence first. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | ## Examples |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Good example: |
| 18 | |
| 19 | - Prompt: instinct-ledger turn these repeated OMH review lessons into project-scoped instincts and show which ones could be promoted globally. |
| 20 | - Expected behavior: Produce `prepare_instinct_ledger` with required context, wrapper actions, and not-evidence boundaries. |
| 21 | - Why: The prompt names a real workflow surface that Hermes can orchestrate without hiding execution. |
| 22 | |
| 23 | Bad example: |
| 24 | |
| 25 | - Prompt: instinct-ledger silently install hooks, learn from every prompt, and mutate all skills globally. |
| 26 | - Expected behavior: Report the missing observed evidence or authority instead of claiming the external step happened. |
| 27 | - Why: Prepared OMH guidance is not platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence. |
| 28 | |
| 29 | ## Completion Checklist |
| 30 | |
| 31 | - Each instinct is atomic: one trigger, one action, one scope, confidence, evidence refs, and review state. |
| 32 | - Project-specific conventions, global practices, project/global promotion candidates, imports, and exports are separated. |
| 33 | - No hooks, memory writes, skill edits, global promotion, import/export, or behavior-change claims are made without observed approval and implementation evidence. |
| 34 | |
| 35 | ## Recovery Notes |
| 36 | |
| 37 | - If the request is a single missed route or run trace, route to workflow-learning first. |
| 38 | - If the request is to mutate durable rules, prompts, skills, or AGENTS guidance, route to rules-distill or implementation after review approval. |
| 39 | - If evidence comes from a stuck run, use agent-debug before converting lessons into instincts. |
| 40 | |
| 41 | ## OMH Context Rail |
| 42 | |
| 43 | - This skill is part of OMH's Hermes workflow layer, not a standalone executor. |
| 44 | - Product context: OMH is a Hermes-native workflow pack: choose skills, shape work, prepare artifacts, show status, and hand off with evidence boundaries. |
| 45 | - Current lane: **Automation and status** (`achievements`, `workspace-audit`, `production-audit`, `automation-blueprint`, `github-event-ops`, `agent-board`, `gateway-intent-card`, `voice-operator`, `+26 more`) - schedules, status, health, and ops review. |
| 46 | - If the user intent belongs to another OMH lane, hand back to `oh-my-hermes` or name the adjacent workflow instead of force-fitting this skill. |
| 47 | - Cross-skill context: every OMH skill: match lane; generic tool can render or execute. |
| 48 | - Generic-tool checkpoint: image->img-summary; frontend->frontend/a11y/visual-qa; paper->paper-learning; content->content-operator; media->media-input-operator; file->materials-package; search->web-research; live->live-info-operator; audit->workspace/production/security; failures->build-failure; verify->verification-gate; code->codegraph/onboarding/ultraprocess. |
| 49 | - Coverage: Every generated workflow skill carries this rail. |
| 50 | - Normal users talk to Hermes; OMH CLI is infra. |
| 51 | - Boundary: Prepared OMH routing, cards, handoffs, or artifacts are not observed execution, image generation, delivery, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence. |
| 52 | |
| 53 | ## Use When |
| 54 | |
| 55 | Use when Hermes should review repeated observations, user corrections, workflow lessons, or failure patterns as atomic project-scoped or global instinct candidates with confidence, evidence, promotion, import, or export decisions. |
| 56 | |
| 57 | Strong routing signals: `instinct-ledger`, `instinct ledger`, `project instincts`, `project-scoped instincts`, `project scoped instincts`, `global instincts`, `instinct review`, `instinct candidate`, `instinct candidates`, `instinct promotion`, `promote instinct`, `promote learning`, `confidence scored learning`, `confidence-scored learning`, `project learning patterns`, `cross-project learning`, `export instincts`, `import instincts`, `학습 본능`, `프로젝트별 학습`, `프로젝트 스코프 학습`, `전역 학습 승격`, `학습 승격`, `학습 패턴 승격` |
| 58 | |
| 59 | ## Catalog Metadata |
| 60 | |
| 61 | Category: `optimization` |
| 62 | Phase: `instinct-ledger` |
| 63 | Hermes role: `tracker` |
| 64 | Quality tier: `workflow-surface-gated` |
| 65 | |
| 66 | Quality bar: |
| 67 | |
| 68 | - Name the user-facing workflow objective, required context, next action, and stop condition. |
| 69 | - Separate prepared guidance from observed platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evide |