$npx -y skills add rlaope/oh-my-hermes --skill ops-observability-card[omh] Hermes ops observability workflow: prepare an operations command-board for wrapper-safe token, cost, latency, run history, queue, failure-mode, external metric-provider, and service-quality evidence boundaries.
| 1 | # Ops Observability Card |
| 2 | |
| 3 | This is a Hermes-native `ops-observability-card` workflow skill. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | ## Why This Exists |
| 6 | |
| 7 | `ops-observability-card` exists so Hermes users can ask for this workflow in chat and receive a structured, evidence-bounded OMH operating surface instead of ad hoc narration. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | ## Do Not Use When |
| 10 | |
| 11 | - The request is already handled by a narrower explicit skill with stronger evidence. |
| 12 | - The user asks OMH to secretly run external platforms, connectors, schedulers, file exports, or runtime agents. |
| 13 | - The only safe answer is to ask for missing authority, credentials, target, or observed evidence first. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | ## Examples |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Good example: |
| 18 | |
| 19 | - Prompt: ops-observability-card show token, cost, latency, supplied Prometheus/Grafana metrics, and missing service-quality evidence for this loop. |
| 20 | - Expected behavior: Produce `prepare_ops_observability_card` with required context, wrapper actions, and not-evidence boundaries. |
| 21 | - Why: The prompt names a real workflow surface that Hermes can orchestrate without hiding execution. |
| 22 | |
| 23 | Bad example: |
| 24 | |
| 25 | - Prompt: ops-observability-card claim exact provider billing, healthy SLO, incident closure, or remediation completion from local estimates. |
| 26 | - Expected behavior: Report the missing observed evidence or authority instead of claiming the external step happened. |
| 27 | - Why: Prepared OMH guidance is not platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence. |
| 28 | |
| 29 | ## Completion Checklist |
| 30 | |
| 31 | - The run or workflow scope, metric window, failure modes, and cost/latency boundary are named. |
| 32 | - Local telemetry, provider truth, billing truth, and completion evidence are separate states. |
| 33 | - Warnings name the next measurement or operator review action. |
| 34 | |
| 35 | ## Recovery Notes |
| 36 | |
| 37 | - If provider metrics are unavailable, report only local metadata and mark provider truth not_observed. |
| 38 | - If cost or latency looks risky, surface a warning plus the next measurement rather than a completion claim. |
| 39 | |
| 40 | ## OMH Context Rail |
| 41 | |
| 42 | - This skill is part of OMH's Hermes workflow layer, not a standalone executor. |
| 43 | - Product context: OMH is a Hermes-native workflow pack: choose skills, shape work, prepare artifacts, show status, and hand off with evidence boundaries. |
| 44 | - Current lane: **Automation and status** (`achievements`, `workspace-audit`, `production-audit`, `automation-blueprint`, `github-event-ops`, `agent-board`, `gateway-intent-card`, `voice-operator`, `+26 more`) - schedules, status, health, and ops review. |
| 45 | - If the user intent belongs to another OMH lane, hand back to `oh-my-hermes` or name the adjacent workflow instead of force-fitting this skill. |
| 46 | - Cross-skill context: every OMH skill: match lane; generic tool can render or execute. |
| 47 | - Generic-tool checkpoint: image->img-summary; frontend->frontend/a11y/visual-qa; paper->paper-learning; content->content-operator; media->media-input-operator; file->materials-package; search->web-research; live->live-info-operator; audit->workspace/production/security; failures->build-failure; verify->verification-gate; code->codegraph/onboarding/ultraprocess. |
| 48 | - Coverage: Every generated workflow skill carries this rail. |
| 49 | - Normal users talk to Hermes; OMH CLI is infra. |
| 50 | - Boundary: Prepared OMH routing, cards, handoffs, or artifacts are not observed execution, image generation, delivery, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence. |
| 51 | |
| 52 | ## Use When |
| 53 | |
| 54 | Use when automation, loops, gateway work, executor handoffs, or service operations need a safe command-board for cost, latency, token, history, failure-mode, supplied metric-provider, and service-quality visibility. |
| 55 | |
| 56 | Strong routing signals: `ops-observability-card`, `observability card`, `operations command board`, `ops command board`, `service quality board`, `service quality`, `external metric provider`, `metric provider`, `prometheus metrics`, `grafana metrics`, `cost telemetry`, `latency telemetry`, `token telemetry`, `run history`, `loop telemetry`, `failure mode`, `monitor tokens`, `service health`, `slo dashboard`, `비용`, `토큰`, `지연시간`, `관측성`, `운영 지휘판`, `서비스 품질`, `메트릭`, `프로메테우스`, `그라파나` |
| 57 | |
| 58 | ## Catalog Metadata |
| 59 | |
| 60 | Category: `observability` |
| 61 | Phase: `telemetry-card` |
| 62 | Hermes role: `tracker` |
| 63 | Quality tier: `workflow-surface-gated` |
| 64 | |
| 65 | Quality bar: |
| 66 | |
| 67 | - Name the user-facing workflow objective, required context, next action, and stop condition. |
| 68 | - Separate prepared guidance from observed platform, runtime, connector, file, memory, or delivery evidence. |
| 69 | - Expose missing tools, credentials, targets, or observations as user-visible gaps. |
| 70 | |
| 71 | Handoff policy: |
| 72 | |
| 73 | Keep this as Hermes-facing orchestration guidance first. Prepare execu |