council

Name: council
Author: Rune-kit

80stars21forks

How to install council?

rune-kit/rune/council

$npx -y skills add Rune-kit/rune --skill council

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Gathers N independent, decorrelated perspectives across model families (external CLIs when present, subagents when not) and arbitrates inline. Use when a decision needs genuine debate — not same-model echo — for critique, review, or judge calls. Honest about degradation: never cl

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# council
2
3	## Purpose
4
5	One coordination primitive that gathers N INDEPENDENT perspectives for any skill needing debate or multi-view judgment. Detects installed AI CLIs → fans a question across distinct model families → degrades gracefully to subagents when no bridge exists → gates off-topic/malformed voices → normalizes claims → arbitrates INLINE (no separate arbiter skill — single producer→single consumer is YAGNI).
6
7	Council's entire value proposition is decorrelated model bias — two different architectures independently reaching the same conclusion is signal; two instances of the same model agreeing is an echo. council refuses to launder the second case as the first.
8
9	<HARD-GATE>
10	If fewer than 2 distinct real `model_family` values answered (excluding `is_fallback` voices AND voices with `model_family: "unknown"` — unconfirmed wrapper-CLI backends, see `references/dispatch-protocol.md` §Detect), council MUST stamp the run `NO_DECORRELATION` and the Arbitrate step MUST NOT use consensus language ("voices agree", "consensus view", "the panel concludes"). Say what happened instead: "N subagents of the same model family produced overlapping output — treat as one perspective, not independent confirmation."
11	</HARD-GATE>
12
13	## Triggers
14
15	- Called by `adversary` — Step 0.6, mode=critique, for plans flagged high-risk/critical-path/expensive-to-reverse
16	- Called by `review` — Step 1.6, mode=review, when blast radius is 50+ callers with a HIGH-severity change
17	- Called by `brainstorm` — Step 3.75, mode=judge, Design-It-Twice Mode only, when N=4 spawned for a remote/external dependency, diversity landed in the 0.4-0.59 marginal band, or the user requests a second opinion on which candidate design is strongest
18	- Called by `problem-solver` — Step 6.5, mode=judge, when a one-way-door decision has a high-impact top solution, or the ethical dimension check surfaced a severe harm/fairness concern
19	- `/rune council <question>` — manual multi-perspective gathering on any question
20	- Auto-trigger: none (always explicit — council is expensive relative to a single pass, callers opt in)
21
22	## Calls (outbound)
23
24	None at the skill level — council dispatches via `Bash` (external CLI bridge) and `Task` (subagent fallback) directly. It does not call other Rune skills.
25
26	## Called By (inbound)
27
28	- `adversary` (L2): Step 0.6 — decorrelated critique before red-teaming a high-risk plan
29	- `review` (L2): Step 1.6 — decorrelated bug-finding when blast radius escalation fires
30	- `brainstorm` (L2): Step 3.75 — decorrelated judgment on which Design-It-Twice candidate is strongest, narrow trigger only
31	- `problem-solver` (L3): Step 6.5 — decorrelated judgment on whether a high-stakes framework conclusion holds (documented L3→L3 coordination)
32	- User: `/rune council` direct invocation
33
34	## Data Flow
35
36	### Feeds Into →
37
38	- `adversary` (L2): `CouncilResult.agreement` → seeds Step 6 Verdict with cross-family-verified findings instead of (or alongside) single-pass analysis
39	- `review` (L2): `CouncilResult.agreement` → seeds Step 6 Report's CRITICAL/HIGH findings for the escalated symbol
40	- `brainstorm` (L2): `CouncilResult.agreement` → seeds Step 4 Recommend with cross-family-verified judgment on the strongest candidate design, alongside (never replacing) the diversity score
41	- `problem-solver` (L3): `CouncilResult.agreement` → seeds Step 6's top solution with a cross-family-verified soundness check before Step 7 communication structuring
42	- `.rune/council/run-*.json`: every run's full result — free tier owns this schema; Pro Council Cockpit (deferred, Phase 2) reads it for a live panel
43
44	### Fed By ←
45
46	- Caller's `PerspectiveRequest` — question, mode, n, diversity constraints, evidence requirements (see `.rune/council-voice-contract.md`)
47	- `.rune/runtimes.json` — cached CLI detection from the current session (council writes this in Step 1, OR `sentinel-env --agents` may have pre-written it during env pre-flight — same council-owned schema, council's Step 1.1 cache-reuse path picks up whichever wrote first)
48
49	## Workflow
50
51	Contract source of truth: `.rune/council-voice-contract.md` (Voice v2). This section is the executable protocol; the contract file is the schema. If the two disagree, the contract wins — update this file to match, don't silently drift.
52
53	### Step 1: DETECT
54
55	1. Check for a cached runtime report at `.rune/runtimes.json`. If it exists and is from the current session (same date), reuse it — skip to

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type

council

80stars21forks

View on GitHub

How to install council?

rune-kit/rune/council

$npx -y skills add Rune-kit/rune --skill council

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# council
2
3	## Purpose
4
5	One coordination primitive that gathers N INDEPENDENT perspectives for any skill needing debate or multi-view judgment. Detects installed AI CLIs → fans a question across distinct model families → degrades gracefully to subagents when no bridge exists → gates off-topic/malformed voices → normalizes claims → arbitrates INLINE (no separate arbiter skill — single producer→single consumer is YAGNI).
6
7	Council's entire value proposition is decorrelated model bias — two different architectures independently reaching the same conclusion is signal; two instances of the same model agreeing is an echo. council refuses to launder the second case as the first.
8
9	<HARD-GATE>
10	If fewer than 2 distinct real `model_family` values answered (excluding `is_fallback` voices AND voices with `model_family: "unknown"` — unconfirmed wrapper-CLI backends, see `references/dispatch-protocol.md` §Detect), council MUST stamp the run `NO_DECORRELATION` and the Arbitrate step MUST NOT use consensus language ("voices agree", "consensus view", "the panel concludes"). Say what happened instead: "N subagents of the same model family produced overlapping output — treat as one perspective, not independent confirmation."
11	</HARD-GATE>
12
13	## Triggers
14
15	- Called by `adversary` — Step 0.6, mode=critique, for plans flagged high-risk/critical-path/expensive-to-reverse
16	- Called by `review` — Step 1.6, mode=review, when blast radius is 50+ callers with a HIGH-severity change
17	- Called by `brainstorm` — Step 3.75, mode=judge, Design-It-Twice Mode only, when N=4 spawned for a remote/external dependency, diversity landed in the 0.4-0.59 marginal band, or the user requests a second opinion on which candidate design is strongest
18	- Called by `problem-solver` — Step 6.5, mode=judge, when a one-way-door decision has a high-impact top solution, or the ethical dimension check surfaced a severe harm/fairness concern
19	- `/rune council <question>` — manual multi-perspective gathering on any question
20	- Auto-trigger: none (always explicit — council is expensive relative to a single pass, callers opt in)
21
22	## Calls (outbound)
23
24	None at the skill level — council dispatches via `Bash` (external CLI bridge) and `Task` (subagent fallback) directly. It does not call other Rune skills.
25
26	## Called By (inbound)
27
28	- `adversary` (L2): Step 0.6 — decorrelated critique before red-teaming a high-risk plan
29	- `review` (L2): Step 1.6 — decorrelated bug-finding when blast radius escalation fires
30	- `brainstorm` (L2): Step 3.75 — decorrelated judgment on which Design-It-Twice candidate is strongest, narrow trigger only
31	- `problem-solver` (L3): Step 6.5 — decorrelated judgment on whether a high-stakes framework conclusion holds (documented L3→L3 coordination)
32	- User: `/rune council` direct invocation
33
34	## Data Flow
35
36	### Feeds Into →
37
38	- `adversary` (L2): `CouncilResult.agreement` → seeds Step 6 Verdict with cross-family-verified findings instead of (or alongside) single-pass analysis
39	- `review` (L2): `CouncilResult.agreement` → seeds Step 6 Report's CRITICAL/HIGH findings for the escalated symbol
40	- `brainstorm` (L2): `CouncilResult.agreement` → seeds Step 4 Recommend with cross-family-verified judgment on the strongest candidate design, alongside (never replacing) the diversity score
41	- `problem-solver` (L3): `CouncilResult.agreement` → seeds Step 6's top solution with a cross-family-verified soundness check before Step 7 communication structuring
42	- `.rune/council/run-*.json`: every run's full result — free tier owns this schema; Pro Council Cockpit (deferred, Phase 2) reads it for a live panel
43
44	### Fed By ←
45
46	- Caller's `PerspectiveRequest` — question, mode, n, diversity constraints, evidence requirements (see `.rune/council-voice-contract.md`)
47	- `.rune/runtimes.json` — cached CLI detection from the current session (council writes this in Step 1, OR `sentinel-env --agents` may have pre-written it during env pre-flight — same council-owned schema, council's Step 1.1 cache-reuse path picks up whichever wrote first)
48
49	## Workflow
50
51	Contract source of truth: `.rune/council-voice-contract.md` (Voice v2). This section is the executable protocol; the contract file is the schema. If the two disagree, the contract wins — update this file to match, don't silently drift.
52
53	### Step 1: DETECT
54
55	1. Check for a cached runtime report at `.rune/runtimes.json`. If it exists and is from the current session (same date), reuse it — skip to

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type