sales-articos
starsforks
How to install sales-articos?
sales-skills/sales/sales-articos
$npx -y skills add sales-skills/sales --skill sales-articosArticos (articos.com) platform help — a synthetic-user research tool: AI personas built on 30 Big-Five facets + cognitive-bias mapping run user interviews, concept tests, and A/B tests → a synthesized report (motivations, objections, recommendations) + a Talk-to-Research chat, in
SKILL.md
| 1 | # Articos Platform Help |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Articos (articos.com) is a **synthetic-user research** tool. You describe a target audience, and Articos |
| 4 | generates **AI personas** — each built on **30 Big Five personality facets** plus **cognitive-bias mapping** — |
| 5 | then runs one of three modes and synthesizes a **research report** (motivations, objections, recommendations) |
| 6 | in **~30 minutes**, with **no recruiting**: **User Interviews** (explore an audience/problem/concept), |
| 7 | **Concept Testing** (message/value-prop/positioning variants), and **A/B Testing** (a landing page or two |
| 8 | variants). Plus a **"Talk to Research"** chat and **probing follow-ups**; reports are shareable, **white-label |
| 9 | on Pro**. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Its niche: **synthetic, not a real panel** — the cheap/fast pre-flight counterpart to real-panel testers |
| 12 | (`/sales-wynter` B2B, `/sales-pickfu` consumer) and a peer of the synthetic-study tools (`/sales-syntheticusers`, |
| 13 | `/sales-ditto`, `/sales-atypica`). **Two real differentiators:** (1) **enforced stance diversity** — it |
| 14 | deliberately generates **skeptics/detractors, not just fans**, which *mitigates* (doesn't cure) the "personas |
| 15 | skew agreeable" bias the whole cluster suffers, and the objections are the highest-signal output; and (2) a |
| 16 | **peer-reviewed 86% accuracy** claim (46 studies / 9 domains, 86% recall vs expert research, marketed **7.5× over |
| 17 | a bare LLM**) — better-sourced than peers' self-reports, but best-effort. **Self-serve:** free trial + 2 |
| 18 | researches, then Starter/Pro or a one-time Research Pack. |
| 19 | |
| 20 | **The double caveat to say almost every time:** (1) a synthetic result is an **AI opinion, not real behavior** — |
| 21 | even with 30 Big-Five facets and enforced skeptics it carries bias, can't reproduce *observed* behavior, and |
| 22 | Articos itself says ~**70–80% of insights hold up**; trust **relative** comparisons + the **objections/rationale** |
| 23 | over absolute reads, and **validate the winner with real people**. (2) Even real resonance is **not demand** — |
| 24 | take the willingness-to-pay / conversion go/no-go to a **real behavior test** via `/sales-idea-validation`. |
| 25 | |
| 26 | ## Step 1 — Gather context |
| 27 | |
| 28 | If `references/learnings.md` exists, read it first for accumulated platform knowledge. |
| 29 | |
| 30 | Ask only what you can't infer: |
| 31 | |
| 32 | 1. **What do you want from Articos?** |
| 33 | - A) **Set up a study** — pick the mode (**User Interviews / Concept Testing / A/B Testing**) and what |
| 34 | you're testing (audience/problem, message/value-prop, or a landing page/variants) |
| 35 | - B) **Describe the audience** — the buyer/user you want personas matched to |
| 36 | - C) **Read results** — the synthesized report (motivations, objections, recommendations), per-persona |
| 37 | answers, and the **Talk-to-Research** chat / **probing follow-ups** |
| 38 | - D) **Budget** — researches per plan, Starter/Pro vs the one-time Research Pack, the free trial |
| 39 | - E) **Get data out** — export/automation (there is **no API/webhooks/MCP**) |
| 40 | - F) **Choose** — Articos (synthetic) vs a real panel (`/sales-wynter` / `/sales-pickfu`) or another |
| 41 | synthetic-study tool (`/sales-syntheticusers`, `/sales-ditto`) |
| 42 | 2. **Is a decision riding on this, or is it a fast pre-flight?** This decides how hard to push the "synthetic |
| 43 | is directional; validate the winner with real people / real behavior" message. |
| 44 | |
| 45 | Skip-ahead: if the user wants the **validate-before-building method** or a **cross-tool comparison**, that's a |
| 46 | `/sales-idea-validation` question — route in Step 2. |
| 47 | |
| 48 | ## Step 2 — Route or answer directly |
| 49 | |
| 50 | | If the user's question is about… | Route to | |
| 51 | |---|---| |
| 52 | | The **validate-before-building method**, or comparing research/validation tools across the market | `/sales-idea-validation {question}` | |
| 53 | | A **REST API / webhook / MCP**-native research pipeline (Articos has none — it's UI-only) | `/sales-userintuition {question}` | |
| 54 | | Running a **real behavior** de |
People who liked this also viewed
6 picksType
- seo-auditWhen the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tagSkillsJul 2026
- copywritingWhen the user wants to write, rewrite, or improve marketing copy for any page — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, about pages, or product pages. Also use when the user sSkillsJul 2026
- marketing-psychologyWhen the user wants to apply psychological principles, mental models, or behavioral science to marketing. Also use when the user mentions 'psychology,' 'mental models,' 'cognitive bias,' 'persuasion,'SkillsJul 2026
- content-strategyWhen the user wants to plan a content strategy, decide what content to create, or figure out what topics to cover. Also use when the user mentions "content strategy," "what should I write about," "conSkillsJul 2026
- programmatic-seoWhen the user wants to create SEO-driven pages at scale using templates and data. Also use when the user mentions "programmatic SEO," "template pages," "pages at scale," "directory pages," "location pSkillsJul 2026
- marketing-ideasWhen the user needs marketing ideas, inspiration, or strategies for their SaaS or software product. Also use when the user asks for 'marketing ideas,' 'growth ideas,' 'how to market,' 'marketing stratSkillsJul 2026
