$npx -y skills add simbajigege/book2skills --skill business-adventures-analysis-brooksUse Business Adventures for "why did this fail?", "analyze this crisis", "what pattern applies?", or "what would Brooks notice?
| 1 | # Business Adventures Analysis — Skill (John Brooks) |
| 2 | |
| 3 | **Knowledge source:** *Business Adventures* by John Brooks. |
| 4 | **Architecture:** Orchestrator + 6 subskills. The main `SKILL.md` routes the user query; subskills execute the diagnostic workflows and own their reference IDs. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | ```text |
| 7 | business-adventures-analysis-brooks/ |
| 8 | ├── SKILL.md |
| 9 | ├── quotes/ |
| 10 | └── subskills/ |
| 11 | ├── m1_failure_diagnosis/ |
| 12 | │ ├── module.md |
| 13 | │ └── references/case_library.md |
| 14 | ├── m2_market_panic/ |
| 15 | │ ├── module.md |
| 16 | │ └── references/case_library.md |
| 17 | ├── m3_regulatory_risk/ |
| 18 | │ ├── module.md |
| 19 | │ └── references/case_library.md |
| 20 | ├── m4_product_innovation/ |
| 21 | │ ├── module.md |
| 22 | │ └── references/case_library.md |
| 23 | ├── m5_governance_accountability/ |
| 24 | │ ├── module.md |
| 25 | │ └── references/case_library.md |
| 26 | └── m6_fraud_institutional_fragility/ |
| 27 | ├── module.md |
| 28 | └── references/case_library.md |
| 29 | ``` |
| 30 | |
| 31 | ## Skill Purpose |
| 32 | |
| 33 | Use this skill to apply John Brooks's *Business Adventures* as a diagnostic framework for corporate failures, market panics, product launches, governance breakdowns, regulatory risk, fraud, innovation, and financial culture. |
| 34 | |
| 35 | The skill does not summarize the book or predict the future by analogy. It maps a live business situation to recurring Brooks patterns: panic, hubris, communication failure, incentive drift, regulatory lag, product-market mismatch, and institutional fragility. |
| 36 | |
| 37 | ## Core Principle |
| 38 | |
| 39 | Human nature is the constant; institutions are the variable. Identify the repeating human pattern first, then examine how structure, incentives, rules, timing, and information flow amplify it. |
| 40 | |
| 41 | ## Workflow Inventory |
| 42 | |
| 43 | | Workflow | User question pattern | Inputs | Steps | Output | Should be subskill? | |
| 44 | |---|---|---|---|---|---| |
| 45 | | Failure diagnosis | "Why did this company, product, or strategy fail?" | Company/product, timeline, market context, decisions | Pattern map, decision chain, warning signals, preventable actions | Primary failure pattern and decision correction | Yes | |
| 46 | | Market panic analysis | "What is happening in this crash?" | Trigger, price moves, liquidity, media, forced sellers | Panic phase, technical amplifiers, stabilizers, uncertainty | Panic diagnosis and stabilizer map | Yes | |
| 47 | | Regulatory risk review | "Is this practice risky?" | Practice, disclosure, materiality, enforcement context | Materiality, public usability, tolerated-practice risk, rule-change trigger | Risk level and action | Yes | |
| 48 | | Product and innovation review | "Will this launch or innovation work?" | Product, customers, incumbents, distribution, research | Timing test, differentiation, incumbent blind spots, commercialization | Stop/redesign/accelerate/monitor recommendation | Yes | |
| 49 | | Governance accountability | "Is management handling this well?" | Board, incentives, crisis response, shareholder/stakeholder power | Formal power vs real consequences, incentives, accountability | Governance diagnosis | Yes | |
| 50 | | Fraud and institutional fragility | "How exposed is this system?" | Trust mechanism, counterparties, collateral, disclosure, losses | Hidden exposure, responsibility transfer, contagion path, controls | Fragility map and safeguards | Yes | |
| 51 | |
| 52 | ## When to Use This Skill |
| 53 | |
| 54 | Invoke this skill when the user asks: |
| 55 | |
| 56 | - "Why did this company, product, or strategy fail?" |
| 57 | - "Analyze this business case." |
| 58 | - "What historical pattern does this resemble?" |
| 59 | - "What would John Brooks say about this crisis?" |
| 60 | - "Is this governance, compliance, or regulatory behavior a warning sign?" |
| 61 | - "How do market panics typically unfold?" |
| 62 | - "What lessons from Edsel, Xerox, Texas Gulf Sulphur, Piggly Wiggly, or the 1962 crash apply here?" |
| 63 | |
| 64 | ## Routing Rules |
| 65 | |
| 66 | | User question type | Must run | Optional run | |
| 67 | |---|---|---| |
| 68 | | Broad case diagnosis or postmortem | M1 Failure Diagnosis | M3, M4, M5, or M6 depending on facts | |
| 69 | | Market crash, liquidity stress, speculative mania, selloff | M2 Market Panic | M6 if counterparties or technical systems are central | |
| 70 | | Insider information, disclosure, antitrust, tax, tolerated practice | M3 Regulatory Risk | M5 if board/executive accountability matters | |
| 71 | | Product launch, failed product, innovation, incumbent blindness | M4 Product and Innovation | M1 for full failure postmortem | |
| 72 | | Board conduct, shareholder power, executive accountability, crisis leadership | M5 Governance Accountability | M3 if legal exposure is material | |
| 73 | | Fraud, collateral failure, hidden exposure, systemic support, institutional trust | M6 Fraud and Institutional Fragility | M2 if panic dynamics are present | |
| 74 | | User asks only for historical parallel | Run the closest single module | M1 if the parallel needs a broader diagnosis | |
| 75 | |
| 76 | ## Ex |