game-design-social-satisfaction-matrix

Name: game-design-social-satisfaction-matrix
Author: Stanestane

34stars3forks

How to install game-design-social-satisfaction-matrix?

stanestane/game-design-skills-bundle/game-design-social-satisfaction-matrix

$npx -y skills add Stanestane/game-design-skills-bundle --skill game-design-social-satisfaction-matrix

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Evaluate a game's social features and multiplayer elements by their potential to create social satisfaction versus social dissatisfaction. Use when auditing chat, voice, friend systems, gifting, lobbies, social hubs, guilds, reporting tools, cooperative mechanics, profile surface

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# Game Design Social Satisfaction Matrix
2
3	Use the Social Satisfaction Matrix to classify social elements by how much they can increase social satisfaction, how much they can create social dissatisfaction, and what that implies for design priority.
4
5	This skill is especially useful when a team knows a feature is "social" but does not yet understand whether it is an expected basic, a risky high-impact critical element, a nice booster, or mostly secondary.
6
7	## Core principle
8
9	Not all social features matter in the same way.
10
11	Some social elements are basic expectations that rarely delight but cause frustration when missing. Some are high-risk, high-value systems that can either deepen connection or amplify harm. Some are nice boosters. Some barely move the needle. The point of the matrix is to stop treating all social features as equally important or equally dangerous.
12
13	## The matrix
14
15	Classify elements into four categories:
16
17	### Basic
18	Must-do elements.
19
20	- low potential to create delight
21	- high potential to create dissatisfaction if missing or weak
22	- expected foundations of the social experience
23
24	Typical examples:
25	- friend list
26	- stable party formation
27	- baseline group management
28	- basic reporting access
29
30	### Critical
31	Make-or-break elements.
32
33	- high potential to create satisfaction
34	- high potential to create dissatisfaction
35	- socially valuable but risky if handled poorly
36
37	Typical examples:
38	- voice chat
39	- open text chat
40	- matchmaking surfaces that strongly affect teammate quality
41	- live team communication systems
42	- public social reputation surfaces
43
44	### Booster
45	Could-do elements that add satisfaction.
46
47	- can make the experience nicer, warmer, or more memorable
48	- low downside if absent
49	- usually not necessary for functional play
50
51	Typical examples:
52	- lightweight gifting
53	- celebratory emotes
54	- temporary cosmetic sharing
55	- playful social acknowledgements
56
57	### Secondary
58	Low-impact elements.
59
60	- low potential to create strong satisfaction
61	- low potential to create strong dissatisfaction
62	- may matter for niche segments, but not majorly for the overall social experience
63
64	Typical examples depend heavily on audience and context. Something secondary for one game or segment may be critical for another.
65
66	## What to produce
67
68	Generate:
69	1. Audit target - what game, mode, or set of social elements is being reviewed
70	2. Element map - where each chosen element sits in the matrix
71	3. Rationale - why each element belongs there
72	4. Risk and opportunity view - what the matrix reveals about the current social landscape
73	5. Improvement priorities - what to fix, protect, redesign, add, or deprioritize
74	6. Sweet-spot judgment - where the design should aim to increase satisfaction without creating disproportionate social risk
75
76	## Process
77
78	### 1. Define the social scope
79
80	Clarify:
81	- what game, feature set, or mode is being audited
82	- which social elements are in scope
83	- what audience or segment matters most
84	- whether the team cares more about retention, safety, delight, community health, matchmaking quality, or social stickiness
85
86	Write:
87	- Target
88	- Audience context
89	- Business/design concern
90
91	### 2. Choose the elements to map
92
93	Pick one or more social elements.
94
95	Good candidates include:
96	- game mechanics with social consequences
97	- chat and voice systems
98	- nonverbal communication systems
99	- friend, guild, or party tools
100	- shared activities
101	- reporting and moderation surfaces
102	- profile and identity surfaces
103	- social hubs or hangout spaces
104	- gifting, acknowledgements, and reciprocal mechanics
105	- goal-setting systems that require or encourage social participation
106
107	### 3. Assess satisfaction potential
108
109	For each element, ask:
110	- can this create positive social moments?
111	- does it help players bond, coordinate, celebrate, contribute, or belong?
112	- does it increase trust, recognition, or meaningful cooperation?
113	- does it align selfish goals with prosocial outcomes?
114	- can it make the game feel warmer, stickier, or more socially rewarding?
115
116	Possible satisfaction sources:
117	- prosocial action
118	- bonding and familiarity
119	- positive recognition
120	- meaningful contribution
121	- active participation
122	- shared accomplishment
123	- belonging and group identity
124	- balanced interdependence
125
126	### 4. Assess dissatisfaction potential
127
128	For each element, ask:
129	- can this facilitate harassment, griefing, or cheating?
130	- does it depend on trust that may not exist?
131	- can it create con

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type

game-design-social-satisfaction-matrix

34stars3forks

View on GitHub

How to install game-design-social-satisfaction-matrix?

stanestane/game-design-skills-bundle/game-design-social-satisfaction-matrix

$npx -y skills add Stanestane/game-design-skills-bundle --skill game-design-social-satisfaction-matrix

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# Game Design Social Satisfaction Matrix
2
3	Use the Social Satisfaction Matrix to classify social elements by how much they can increase social satisfaction, how much they can create social dissatisfaction, and what that implies for design priority.
4
5	This skill is especially useful when a team knows a feature is "social" but does not yet understand whether it is an expected basic, a risky high-impact critical element, a nice booster, or mostly secondary.
6
7	## Core principle
8
9	Not all social features matter in the same way.
10
11	Some social elements are basic expectations that rarely delight but cause frustration when missing. Some are high-risk, high-value systems that can either deepen connection or amplify harm. Some are nice boosters. Some barely move the needle. The point of the matrix is to stop treating all social features as equally important or equally dangerous.
12
13	## The matrix
14
15	Classify elements into four categories:
16
17	### Basic
18	Must-do elements.
19
20	- low potential to create delight
21	- high potential to create dissatisfaction if missing or weak
22	- expected foundations of the social experience
23
24	Typical examples:
25	- friend list
26	- stable party formation
27	- baseline group management
28	- basic reporting access
29
30	### Critical
31	Make-or-break elements.
32
33	- high potential to create satisfaction
34	- high potential to create dissatisfaction
35	- socially valuable but risky if handled poorly
36
37	Typical examples:
38	- voice chat
39	- open text chat
40	- matchmaking surfaces that strongly affect teammate quality
41	- live team communication systems
42	- public social reputation surfaces
43
44	### Booster
45	Could-do elements that add satisfaction.
46
47	- can make the experience nicer, warmer, or more memorable
48	- low downside if absent
49	- usually not necessary for functional play
50
51	Typical examples:
52	- lightweight gifting
53	- celebratory emotes
54	- temporary cosmetic sharing
55	- playful social acknowledgements
56
57	### Secondary
58	Low-impact elements.
59
60	- low potential to create strong satisfaction
61	- low potential to create strong dissatisfaction
62	- may matter for niche segments, but not majorly for the overall social experience
63
64	Typical examples depend heavily on audience and context. Something secondary for one game or segment may be critical for another.
65
66	## What to produce
67
68	Generate:
69	1. Audit target - what game, mode, or set of social elements is being reviewed
70	2. Element map - where each chosen element sits in the matrix
71	3. Rationale - why each element belongs there
72	4. Risk and opportunity view - what the matrix reveals about the current social landscape
73	5. Improvement priorities - what to fix, protect, redesign, add, or deprioritize
74	6. Sweet-spot judgment - where the design should aim to increase satisfaction without creating disproportionate social risk
75
76	## Process
77
78	### 1. Define the social scope
79
80	Clarify:
81	- what game, feature set, or mode is being audited
82	- which social elements are in scope
83	- what audience or segment matters most
84	- whether the team cares more about retention, safety, delight, community health, matchmaking quality, or social stickiness
85
86	Write:
87	- Target
88	- Audience context
89	- Business/design concern
90
91	### 2. Choose the elements to map
92
93	Pick one or more social elements.
94
95	Good candidates include:
96	- game mechanics with social consequences
97	- chat and voice systems
98	- nonverbal communication systems
99	- friend, guild, or party tools
100	- shared activities
101	- reporting and moderation surfaces
102	- profile and identity surfaces
103	- social hubs or hangout spaces
104	- gifting, acknowledgements, and reciprocal mechanics
105	- goal-setting systems that require or encourage social participation
106
107	### 3. Assess satisfaction potential
108
109	For each element, ask:
110	- can this create positive social moments?
111	- does it help players bond, coordinate, celebrate, contribute, or belong?
112	- does it increase trust, recognition, or meaningful cooperation?
113	- does it align selfish goals with prosocial outcomes?
114	- can it make the game feel warmer, stickier, or more socially rewarding?
115
116	Possible satisfaction sources:
117	- prosocial action
118	- bonding and familiarity
119	- positive recognition
120	- meaningful contribution
121	- active participation
122	- shared accomplishment
123	- belonging and group identity
124	- balanced interdependence
125
126	### 4. Assess dissatisfaction potential
127
128	For each element, ask:
129	- can this facilitate harassment, griefing, or cheating?
130	- does it depend on trust that may not exist?
131	- can it create con

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type