$npx -y skills add Varnan-Tech/opendirectory --skill pricing-page-psychology-auditAudits any SaaS pricing page URL against 12 pricing psychology principles and outputs a ranked improvement report with specific rewrite suggestions and quick wins.
| 1 | # Pricing Page Psychology Audit |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Scrape any SaaS pricing page and audit it against 12 proven pricing psychology |
| 4 | principles. Get a scored Markdown report with specific rewrite suggestions per |
| 5 | tier and a "Top 3 Quick Wins" section. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | --- |
| 8 | |
| 9 | ## Step 1: Get the Target URL |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Ask the user: |
| 12 | "Which SaaS pricing page should I audit? Share the full URL |
| 13 | (e.g. https://linear.app/pricing)" |
| 14 | |
| 15 | If no URL is provided, stop and ask. Do not proceed without a valid URL |
| 16 | starting with http:// or https://. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | --- |
| 19 | |
| 20 | ## Step 2: Run the Scraper |
| 21 | |
| 22 | Run the scraper script with the URL: |
| 23 | |
| 24 | ```bash |
| 25 | python scripts/scrape_pricing.py "URL_HERE" |
| 26 | ``` |
| 27 | |
| 28 | The script outputs structured text to stdout. Capture the output — it contains: |
| 29 | - Page title |
| 30 | - All visible text content |
| 31 | - Button labels (CTAs) |
| 32 | - Plan names and prices |
| 33 | - Feature list items |
| 34 | |
| 35 | If the script fails (timeout, blocked, invalid URL), tell the user: |
| 36 | "The page could not be scraped: [error]. Try a different URL or check |
| 37 | if the site blocks bots." |
| 38 | |
| 39 | --- |
| 40 | |
| 41 | ## Step 3: Evaluate Against 12 Psychology Principles |
| 42 | |
| 43 | Analyze the scraped content against each principle. For each, assign: |
| 44 | - ✅ Pass — clearly present and well-executed |
| 45 | - ⚠️ Needs Work — present but weak or could be improved |
| 46 | - ❌ Missing — not present at all |
| 47 | |
| 48 | ### The 12 Principles: |
| 49 | |
| 50 | 1. **Anchoring** — Is there a high-priced plan shown first or prominently to |
| 51 | make others feel cheaper? |
| 52 | |
| 53 | 2. **Decoy Effect** — Is there a middle-tier plan designed to make the top |
| 54 | tier look like better value? |
| 55 | |
| 56 | 3. **Loss Aversion Framing** — Does copy use "don't miss out", "limited", |
| 57 | "you'll lose access" rather than purely gain language? |
| 58 | |
| 59 | 4. **Feature-vs-Value Naming** — Do plan names/descriptions highlight |
| 60 | outcomes ("Close more deals") vs just features ("10 seats")? |
| 61 | |
| 62 | 5. **Social Proof Placement** — Are testimonials, logos, or user counts |
| 63 | shown near pricing tiers (not just on a separate page)? |
| 64 | |
| 65 | 6. **Urgency / Scarcity Signals** — Is there a countdown timer, limited |
| 66 | spots badge, or "offer ends" language? |
| 67 | |
| 68 | 7. **Plan Naming Psychology** — Are plan names aspirational |
| 69 | (Starter/Growth/Scale) vs generic (Basic/Pro/Enterprise)? |
| 70 | |
| 71 | 8. **CTA Button Copy** — Do CTAs say action-outcome ("Start growing free") |
| 72 | vs generic ("Sign up" or "Get started")? |
| 73 | |
| 74 | 9. **Free Trial vs Freemium Framing** — Is the free offer framed clearly? |
| 75 | Does it reduce friction or create confusion? |
| 76 | |
| 77 | 10. **Price Ending Tactics** — Do prices end in 9 ($49, $99) for perceived |
| 78 | value, or round numbers ($50, $100) for premium feel? |
| 79 | |
| 80 | 11. **Visual Hierarchy of Tiers** — Is the recommended/popular plan visually |
| 81 | highlighted (badge, border, size difference)? |
| 82 | |
| 83 | 12. **Guarantee / Trust Signal Presence** — Is there a money-back guarantee, |
| 84 | "no credit card required", or security badge near the CTA? |
| 85 | |
| 86 | --- |
| 87 | |
| 88 | ## Step 4: Generate the Audit Report |
| 89 | |
| 90 | Output the report in this exact Markdown structure: |
| 91 | |
| 92 | ``` |
| 93 | # Pricing Page Psychology Audit |
| 94 | **URL:** [URL] |
| 95 | **Audited on:** [today's date] |
| 96 | **Overall Score:** X/12 principles passing |
| 97 | |
| 98 | --- |
| 99 | |
| 100 | ## Audit Results |
| 101 | |
| 102 | ### 1. Anchoring — ✅ Pass / ⚠️ Needs Work / ❌ Missing |
| 103 | **What we found:** [1-2 sentences from the page] |
| 104 | **Suggestion:** [Specific rewrite or change to make] |
| 105 | |
| 106 | [Repeat for all 12 principles] |
| 107 | |
| 108 | --- |
| 109 | |
| 110 | ## 🏆 Top 3 Quick Wins |
| 111 | |
| 112 | These are your highest-leverage changes, prioritized by impact vs effort: |
| 113 | |
| 114 | **Quick Win #1 — [Principle name]** |
| 115 | Current: "[exact copy from page]" |
| 116 | Rewrite to: "[your improved version]" |
| 117 | Why: [1 sentence on the psychological mechanism] |
| 118 | |
| 119 | **Quick Win #2 — [Principle name]** |
| 120 | ... |
| 121 | |
| 122 | **Quick Win #3 — [Principle name]** |
| 123 | ... |
| 124 | ``` |
| 125 | |
| 126 | --- |
| 127 | |
| 128 | ## Step 5: Self-QA Before Output |
| 129 | |
| 130 | Check before presenting the report: |
| 131 | - [ ] All 12 principles are scored (none skipped) |
| 132 | - [ ] Each "Suggestion" is specific — no generic advice like "add social proof" |
| 133 | - [ ] Quick Wins cite actual copy from the page (not invented) |
| 134 | - [ ] Scores reflect what is literally present in the scraped content |
| 135 | - [ ] Date is today's actual date |
| 136 | |
| 137 | Fix any violation before output. |
| 138 | |
| 139 | --- |
| 140 | |
| 141 | ## Step 6: Offer Follow-ups |
| 142 | |
| 143 | After presenting the report, offer: |
| 144 | 1. "Export this as a PDF-ready Markdown file" |
| 145 | 2. "Generate rewrite copy for all CTAs on this page" |
| 146 | 3. "Compare against a competitor's pricing page" |
| 147 | 4. "Build a prioritized action plan for the dev team" |