yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit
20 skills
$npx skills add yha9806/academic-writing-toolkitSkillInstalls
argument-governanceBuild and audit the manuscript argument system: intent, gap-contribution alignment, hierarchical claims, evidence balance, limitations, and reviewer attack surfaces. Use when a paper, thesis chapter, auditUse when checking a thesis draft before submission for inconsistent numbers, terminology, cross-references, or citation problems.evidence-reviewBuild evidence-controlled literature reviews and gap maps with source-status labels, claim registers, citation-role plans, traceability tables, and overclaim audits. Use when drafting or auditing reviexportConvert thesis chapters and reading notes from Markdown to Word (.docx) and package for submission. Use when preparing materials for supervisors or examiners.human-eval-handoff-repairUse when validating, repairing, or mapping human-evaluation handoff packages, filled annotation CSVs, rebuttal annotation UIs, or reviewer annotation returns across package versions. Applies to checkiintegrateMap reading notes to thesis chapters and integrate key arguments into the manuscript. Use after completing a reading session to weave new material into the thesis.logic-reviewReview chapter drafts for paragraph-level flow, transitions, and argument continuity before editing.manuscript-reframeReframe academic manuscript drafts that read like engineering reports, module inventories, internal validation packets, or system notes into paper-form scientific arguments with clear gap, contributiomapShow or update the mapping between literature and thesis chapters — which sources support which arguments. Use for tracking coverage.noteRecord reading notes to a structured notes file. Use when the user says "take notes" or "record this" during reading sessions.peer-reviewReview another author's manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, proposal, or preprint as an external reviewer. Use when asked to evaluate novelty, significance, gap-contribution fit, claim-evidence adequacprogressShow reading and writing progress dashboard — how many sources read, chapters completed, word counts, and coverage gaps.readRead PDF page by page with structured output — key arguments, terms glossary, thesis connections. Use when reading academic papers, books, or articles.release-governanceUse when preparing, auditing, releasing, or rebuttal-hardening academic manuscripts, datasets, artifacts, reviewer packets, or claim registers involving multiple refs, local assets, human labels, or arevision-escalationStop repeated failed writing, coding, manuscript, rebuttal, or restructuring revisions when the same issue has gone through 3+ unsatisfactory edits, vague feedback such as still wrong/weird/unclear/weself-reviewReview the user's own manuscript, paper, thesis chapter, rebuttal, or release packet with clean-room anti-contamination controls. Use when asked for self-review, internal review, pre-submission reviewstyleCheck thesis text for British English consistency and safe mechanical spelling fixes.thesis-controlUse when AI-assisted thesis edits risk claim drift, scope creep, loss of author control, or repeated revisions that fail to converge; provides spine cards, edit contracts, drift audits, revision escalverifyFact-check claims encountered during reading — dates, names, events, citations. Use when encountering historical facts or disputed claims.verify-refsUse when checking BibTeX reference records for missing fields, malformed identifiers, duplicate keys, or metadata mismatches before submission.