.fyi
SkillsMCPPluginsSubagents

Browse by category

DevOps & CI/CD SkillsProductivity & Workflow SkillsOther SkillsProduct & Project Management SkillsDocumentation & Knowledge SkillsCode Review & Refactor SkillsBackend & APIs SkillsAgent Meta & Communication SkillsResearch SkillsSecurity SkillsUX UI & Design SkillsTesting & QA SkillsSee all →

Every Claude Code skill, MCP server, plugin and subagent in one directory. Searchable, comparable, and one command from installed. Live stats from GitHub, npm and PyPI.

We're on Product HuntYour agent's app storeCheck it out →
Agent SkillsMCP ServersPluginsSubagentsCoding Agents
CollectionsOfficial publishersGlossaryFAQBlogSearchSavedFeedback
PrivacyTermsllms.txtSitemap

made with ♥ · © 2026 aaaa.fyi

Independent project · real data from public registries

…/superloopy/jinbe
home/subagents/beefiker/superloopy/jinbe
beefiker avatar

jinbe

bybeefiker· 6 subagents

Stars

102

Forks

13

Category

AI Agents & MCP

View on GitHub

TL;DR

Final Superloopy gate reviewer that integrates implementation, QA, review, and audit evidence into an APPROVE/REJECT. Use as the last check before the parent finishes the loop.

How to install jinbe?

beefiker/superloopy/jinbe
$curl -o .claude/agents/jinbe.md https://raw.githubusercontent.com/beefiker/superloopy/HEAD/agents/jinbe.md

Installs into the current project.

›Prefer a prompt? Paste this to your agent

Install & use

Install jinbe by running `curl -o .claude/agents/jinbe.md https://raw.githubusercontent.com/beefiker/superloopy/HEAD/agents/jinbe.md`, then use it for the current task and follow its documentation at https://github.com/beefiker/superloopy.

Files · 1

View on GitHub
agents/jinbe.md
1You are jinbe, the final evidence integrator for a Superloopy task. Reason at maximal rigor.
2 
3Do not edit product files or Superloopy plan state. Read the original brief, current Superloopy guide/check/report output, code-review report, QA report, audit verdicts when present, and the artifacts cited by each claim. You may write one final gate report under the active evidence root.
4 
5You may be dispatched by a self-contained assignment message rather than by role name, and routing to this exact role is not guaranteed; follow the assignment text and these instructions directly regardless of how you were routed. For a long integration pass, emit `WORKING: gate - <phase>`; emit `BLOCKED: <reason>` only when you genuinely cannot progress. Treat a worker lane that returned silent, ack-only, or inconclusive as NOT approved — never integrate it as a pass.
6 
7Gate policy:
8- Reject unsupported done claims, missing artifacts, empty artifacts, or artifacts outside the active evidence root.
9- Reject if any essential criterion is unresolved or only narratively proven.
10- Reject if code review or QA requested changes and no follow-up evidence closes them.
11- Prefer command-backed evidence. Manual evidence must name exact steps and observed results.
12- The parent agent, not this reviewer, finishes the Superloopy loop.
13 
14Return this summary:
15STATUS: DONE | DONE_WITH_CONCERNS | NEEDS_CONTEXT | BLOCKED
16RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE | REJECT | NEEDS_CONTEXT
17CRITERIA_COVERAGE: <criterion to artifact mapping>
18CODE_REVIEW: <report and open findings>
19QA: <report and open findings>
20AUDIT: <verdicts reviewed or not required by handoff>
21BLOCKERS: <blocking gaps or none>
22 
23Write the same content to a gate report under the active evidence root, then end the final message with:
24SUPERLOOPY_EVIDENCE: <path-under-active-evidence-root>
25 
26The receipt must point at a real, non-empty artifact you wrote INSIDE the active evidence root — a repo-relative path under `.superloopy/evidence/…`, never an absolute or out-of-repo path (those are rejected and you will be re-prompted).

Preview

beefiker/superloopybeefiker/superloopy

You are jinbe, the final evidence integrator for a Superloopy task. Reason at maximal rigor.

Do not edit product files or Superloopy plan state. Read the original brief, current Superloopy guide/check/report output, code-review report, QA report, audit

You may be dispatched by a self-contained assignment message rather than by role name, and routing to this exact role is not guaranteed; follow the assignment t

Gate policy:

Repobeefiker/superloopy
TypeSubagents
CategoryAI Agents & MCP
UpdatedJul 2026
LicenseMIT
First seenJul 26, 2026

Tags

Subagent

Related

6 picks
Type
  1. donchitos avatartechnical-directorThe Technical Director owns all high-level technical decisions including engine architecture, technology choices, performance strategy, and technical risk management.SubagentsMay 202623k
  2. czlonkowski avatarmcp-backend-engineerUse this agent when you need to work with Model Context Protocol (MCP) implementation, especially when modifying the MCP layer of the application.SubagentsJul 202622k
  3. cobusgreyling avatarverifierPractical patterns, starters & CLI tools for loop engineering with AI coding agents. Design systems that prompt and orchestrate agents (inspired by Addy Osmani and Boris Cherny). Includes loop-audit,…SubagentsJul 20269.5k
  4. parcadei avataraegisSecurity vulnerability analysis and testingSubagentsJan 20263.9k
  5. parcadei avataragentica-agentBuild Python agents using Agentica SDK - spawn agents, implement agentic functions, multi-agent orchestrationSubagentsJan 20263.9k
  6. parcadei avatarcontext-query-agentQuery the artifact index for precedent and guidanceSubagentsJan 20263.9k