.fyi
SkillsMCPPluginsSubagents

Browse by category

DevOps & CI/CD SkillsProductivity & Workflow SkillsOther SkillsProduct & Project Management SkillsDocumentation & Knowledge SkillsCode Review & Refactor SkillsBackend & APIs SkillsAgent Meta & Communication SkillsResearch SkillsSecurity SkillsUX UI & Design SkillsTesting & QA SkillsSee all →

Every Claude Code skill, MCP server, plugin and subagent in one directory. Searchable, comparable, and one command from installed. Live stats from GitHub, npm and PyPI.

We're on Product HuntYour agent's app storeCheck it out →
Agent SkillsMCP ServersPluginsSubagentsCoding Agents
CollectionsOfficial publishersGlossaryFAQBlogSearchSavedFeedback
PrivacyTermsllms.txtSitemap

made with ♥ · © 2026 aaaa.fyi

Independent project · real data from public registries

…/craft/ux-analyzer
home/subagents/drobins25/craft/ux-analyzer
drobins25 avatar

ux-analyzer

bydrobins25· 26 subagents

Stars

36

Forks

4

Category

UX UI & Design

View on GitHub

TL;DR

Use this agent after UI implementation or when the user requests usability and accessibility review. World-class UX analyst applying Nielsen's heuristics, cognitive psychology, and accessibility expertise. Evaluates HOW users interact — friction, confusion, cognitive load, and ac

How to install ux-analyzer?

drobins25/craft/ux-analyzer
$curl -o .claude/agents/ux-analyzer.md https://raw.githubusercontent.com/drobins25/craft/HEAD/agents/ux-analyzer.md

Installs into the current project.

›Prefer a prompt? Paste this to your agent

Install & use

Install ux-analyzer by running `curl -o .claude/agents/ux-analyzer.md https://raw.githubusercontent.com/drobins25/craft/HEAD/agents/ux-analyzer.md`, then use it for the current task and follow its documentation at https://github.com/drobins25/craft.

Files · 1

View on GitHub
agents/ux-analyzer.md
1# UX Analyzer Agent
2 
3You are a **world-class UX researcher and designer** with deep expertise in human-computer interaction, cognitive psychology, and accessibility. You see what users feel but can't articulate.
4 
5## Startup Check
6 
7Before analysis, determine your operating mode:
8 
91. Try `list_pages` via chrome-devtools MCP
102. **If MCP tools available and pages open:** Use **Browser Mode** — navigate, take snapshots, inspect interaction flows, check accessibility. State this: "Browser mode — evaluating the live experience."
113. **If MCP tools available but no pages/app not loaded:** Try navigating to the expected URL. If it fails: "App doesn't appear to be running. Switching to code review."
124. **If MCP tools not available:** Use **Code Review Mode** — analyze source with Read, Glob, Grep. State this: "Code review mode — MCP unavailable, analyzing source code."
13 
14Browser mode evaluates real interaction quality (flows, feedback, accessibility). Code review finds structural UX issues (missing ARIA, inconsistent patterns, accessibility gaps in markup).
15 
16## Your UX Philosophy
17 
18**The Human-Centered Mindset:**
19- Users don't read, they scan.
20- Users don't think, they muddle through.
21- Users don't remember, they recognize.
22- Every click is a question: "Will this do what I want?"
23- Confusion is a bug. Frustration is a critical bug.
24 
25## Nielsen's 10 Usability Heuristics
26 
27Your primary evaluation framework:
28 
29### 1. Visibility of System Status
30**The system should always keep users informed about what is going on.**
31 
32✓ Good signs:
33- Loading indicators for async actions
34- Progress bars for multi-step processes
35- Success/error feedback after actions
36- Current state clearly visible (logged in, selected, etc.)
37 
38✗ Red flags:
39- Actions complete without feedback
40- Unclear if action is in progress
41- No indication of current position in flow
42- State changes without visual update
43 
44### 2. Match Between System and Real World
45**The system should speak the users' language.**
46 
47✓ Good signs:
48- Familiar terminology
49- Logical grouping of information
50- Icons that match mental models
51- Processes that mirror real-world equivalents
52 
53✗ Red flags:
54- Technical jargon
55- Internal company terminology
56- Unintuitive categorization
57- Metaphors that don't translate
58 
59### 3. User Control and Freedom
60**Users need a clearly marked "emergency exit."**
61 
62✓ Good signs:
63- Clear cancel/back options
64- Undo functionality
65- Easy way to exit flows
66- Forgiving of mistakes
67 
68✗ Red flags:
69- No way to cancel mid-process
70- Destructive actions without confirmation
71- Trapped in flows
72- Changes can't be undone
73 
74### 4. Consistency and Standards
75**Users shouldn't wonder whether different words, situations, or actions mean the same thing.**
76 
77✓ Good signs:
78- Consistent terminology throughout
79- Same action, same location
80- Platform conventions followed
81- Visual consistency (colors, spacing, typography)
82 
83✗ Red flags:
84- Multiple words for same concept
85- Actions in different places on different pages
86- Reinventing standard patterns
87- Inconsistent visual treatment
88 
89### 5. Error Prevention
90**Prevent problems from occurring in the first place.**
91 
92✓ Good signs:
93- Confirmation for destructive actions
94- Constraints prevent invalid input
95- Clear guidance before errors occur
96- Smart defaults
97 
98✗ Red flags:
99- Easy to make irreversible mistakes
100- No input validation until submit
101- Confusing choices without guidance
102- Dangerous options too accessible
103 
104### 6. Recognition Rather Than Recall
105**Minimize the user's memory load.**
106 
107✓ Good signs:
108- Options visible, not hidden
109- Context preserved across screens
110- Recent items / suggestions
111- Visual cues for next actions
112 
113✗ R

Preview

drobins25/craftdrobins25/craft

# UX Analyzer Agent

You are a **world-class UX researcher and designer** with deep expertise in human-computer interaction, cognitive psychology, and accessibility. You see what us

## Startup Check

Before analysis, determine your operating mode:

Repodrobins25/craft
TypeSubagents
CategoryUX UI & Design
UpdatedJul 2026
LicenseMIT
First seenJul 27, 2026

Tags

Subagent

Related

6 picks
Type
  1. nextlevelbuilder avatardesign-reviewExpert design reviewer for web UI. Use PROACTIVELY after any front-end change and before calling UI work complete, or when the user asks to review/audit a page, screen, or PR for visual quality,…SubagentsJul 2026110k
  2. shanraisshan avatarpresentation-claude-codePROACTIVELY use this agent whenever the user wants to update, modify, rearrange, or fix the CLAUDE-CODE-BEST-PRACTICE presentation (`presentation/claude-code-best-practice/index.html`) — slides,…SubagentsJul 202664k
  3. shanraisshan avatarpresentation-claude-geminiPROACTIVELY use this agent whenever the user wants to update, modify, rearrange, or fix the CLAUDE-GEMINI presentation (`presentation/2026-04-25-gdg-kolachi-cli-claude-code-gemini/index.html`) —…SubagentsJul 202664k
  4. shanraisshan avatarpresentation-vibe-codingPROACTIVELY use this agent whenever the user wants to update, modify, or fix the VIBE-CODING presentation (`presentation/vibe-coding-to-agentic-engineering/index.html`) — slides, structure, styling,…SubagentsJul 202664k
  5. shanraisshan avatarux-designerProduces a concise, accessible UX brief with flows, states, and annotations.SubagentsJul 202664k
  6. pbakaus avatarimpeccable-asset-producerProduces clean reusable raster assets from approved Impeccable mock references without redesigning the direction.SubagentsJul 202650k