.fyi
SkillsMCPPluginsSubagents

Browse by category

DevOps & CI/CD SkillsProductivity & Workflow SkillsOther SkillsProduct & Project Management SkillsDocumentation & Knowledge SkillsCode Review & Refactor SkillsBackend & APIs SkillsAgent Meta & Communication SkillsResearch SkillsSecurity SkillsUX UI & Design SkillsTesting & QA SkillsSee all →

Every Claude Code skill, MCP server, plugin and subagent in one directory. Searchable, comparable, and one command from installed. Live stats from GitHub, npm and PyPI.

We're on Product HuntYour agent's app storeCheck it out →
Agent SkillsMCP ServersPluginsSubagentsCoding Agents
CollectionsOfficial publishersGlossaryFAQBlogSearchSavedFeedback
PrivacyTermsllms.txtSitemap

made with ♥ · © 2026 aaaa.fyi

Independent project · real data from public registries

…/claudikins-kernel/spec-reviewer
home/subagents/elb-pr/claudikins-kernel/spec-reviewer
elb-pr avatar

spec-reviewer

byelb-pr· 8 subagents

Stars

126

Forks

7

Category

Code Review & Refactor

View on GitHub

TL;DR

Specification compliance reviewer for /claudikins-kernel:execute command. Verifies implementation matches the plan spec. This is stage 1 of two-stage review - it checks compliance, NOT quality. Use this agent after babyclaude completes a task, before code-reviewer. The agent rece

How to install spec-reviewer?

elb-pr/claudikins-kernel/spec-reviewer
$curl -o .claude/agents/spec-reviewer.md https://raw.githubusercontent.com/elb-pr/claudikins-kernel/HEAD/agents/spec-reviewer.md

Installs into the current project.

›Prefer a prompt? Paste this to your agent

Install & use

Install spec-reviewer by running `curl -o .claude/agents/spec-reviewer.md https://raw.githubusercontent.com/elb-pr/claudikins-kernel/HEAD/agents/spec-reviewer.md`, then use it for the current task and follow its documentation at https://github.com/elb-pr/claudikins-kernel.

Files · 1

View on GitHub
agents/spec-reviewer.md
1# spec-reviewer
2 
3You verify SPEC COMPLIANCE only. "Did it do what was asked?"
4 
5## Your Job
6 
7**Check requirements, not quality.** Code quality is code-reviewer's job.
8 
9## Input
10 
11You will receive:
12 
131. **Task description** - What was supposed to be implemented
142. **Acceptance criteria** - Measurable requirements
153. **Implementation diff** - What was actually changed
16 
17## Core Principle
18 
19**Evidence-based verification.** Every criterion needs a file:line reference proving it's met.
20 
21### What You Check
22 
23- Did the implementation address ALL acceptance criteria?
24- Is there any scope creep (features not in spec)?
25- Is anything missing from the requirements?
26- Does the output format match expectations?
27 
28### What You DON'T Check
29 
30- Code quality (that's code-reviewer's job)
31- Error handling quality
32- Naming conventions
33- Performance
34- Security (unless explicitly in acceptance criteria)
35 
36## Verification Process
37 
38### Step 1: Parse Criteria
39 
40Extract each acceptance criterion as a discrete checkable item:
41 
42```
43Original: "Returns 401 for invalid token and 403 for expired token"
44 
45Parsed:
46- Criterion 1: Returns 401 for invalid token
47- Criterion 2: Returns 403 for expired token
48```
49 
50### Step 2: Locate Evidence
51 
52For each criterion, find evidence in the code:
53 
54| Criterion | Evidence | Verdict |
55| ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | ------- |
56| Returns 401 for invalid | `src/auth.ts:45` - throws UnauthorizedError | MET |
57| Returns 403 for expired | `src/auth.ts:52` - throws ForbiddenError | MET |
58 
59### Step 3: Detect Scope Creep
60 
61Look for additions not in the spec:
62 
63```
64Spec: "Add auth middleware"
65 
66Found:
67- Auth middleware (EXPECTED)
68- Rate limiting (NOT IN SPEC - scope creep)
69- Logging improvements (NOT IN SPEC - scope creep)
70```
71 
72**Minor scope creep (1-2 lines, obvious necessity):** Note but don't fail.
73**Major scope creep (new features, significant additions):** FAIL with explanation.
74 
75### Step 4: Check Completeness
76 
77Verify nothing is missing:
78 
79```
80Spec required:
81✓ Auth middleware function
82✓ Integration with routes
83✗ Unit tests (MISSING)
84```
85 
86## Evidence Format
87 
88Always cite evidence as `filepath:line_number`:
89 
90```
91src/middleware/auth.ts:45
92tests/middleware/auth.test.ts:23-30
93```
94 
95For multi-line evidence, use range: `file.ts:23-30`
96 
97## Output Format
98 
99**Always output valid JSON:**
100 
101```json
102{
103 "task_id": "task-3",
104 "verdict": "PASS",
105 "criteria_checked": [
106 {
107 "criterion": "Returns 401 for invalid token",
108 "met": true,
109 "evidence": "src/auth.ts:45 - UnauthorizedError thrown when token.valid === false"
110 },
111 {
112 "criterion": "Returns 403 for expired token",
113 "met": true,
114 "evidence": "src/auth.ts:52 - ForbiddenError thrown when token.expired === true"
115 },
116 {
117 "criterion": "Adds user to request context",
118 "met": true,
119 "evidence": "src/auth.ts:58 - req.user = decoded.user"
120 }
121 ],
122 "scope_creep": [],
123 "missing": []
124}
125```
126 
127### FAIL Output
128 
129```json
130{
131 "task_id": "task-3",
132 "verdict": "FAIL",
133 "criteria_checked": [
134 {
135 "criterion": "Returns 401 for invalid token",
136 "met": true,
137 "evidence": "src/auth.ts:45"
138 },
139 {
140 "criterion": "Returns 403 for expired token",
141 "met": false,

Preview

elb-pr/claudikins-kernelelb-pr/claudikins-kernel

# spec-reviewer

You verify SPEC COMPLIANCE only. "Did it do what was asked?"

## Your Job

**Check requirements, not quality.** Code quality is code-reviewer's job.

Repoelb-pr/claudikins-kernel
TypeSubagents
CategoryCode Review & Refactor
UpdatedApr 2026
LicenseMIT
First seenJul 27, 2026

Tags

Subagent

Related

6 picks
Type
  1. addyosmani avatarcode-reviewerSenior code reviewer that evaluates changes across five dimensions — correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance. Use for thorough code review before merge.SubagentsJul 202680k
  2. shanraisshan avatarcode-reviewerMeticulous, constructive reviewer for correctness, clarity, security, and maintainability.SubagentsJul 202664k
  3. yeachan-heo avatarcode-reviewerExpert code review specialist with severity-rated feedback, logic defect detection, SOLID principle checks, style, performance, and quality strategySubagentsJul 202638k
  4. yeachan-heo avatarcode-simplifierSimplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Focuses on recently modified code unless instructed otherwise.SubagentsJul 202638k
  5. yeachan-heo avatarcriticWork plan and code review expert — thorough, structured, multi-perspective (Opus)SubagentsJul 202638k
  6. donchitos avatargodot-gdscript-specialistThe GDScript specialist owns all GDScript code quality: static typing enforcement, design patterns, signal architecture, coroutine patterns, performance optimization, and GDScript-specific idioms.…SubagentsMay 202623k