.fyi
SkillsMCPPluginsSubagents

Browse by category

DevOps & CI/CD SkillsProductivity & Workflow SkillsOther SkillsProduct & Project Management SkillsDocumentation & Knowledge SkillsCode Review & Refactor SkillsBackend & APIs SkillsAgent Meta & Communication SkillsResearch SkillsSecurity SkillsUX UI & Design SkillsTesting & QA SkillsSee all →

Every Claude Code skill, MCP server, plugin and subagent in one directory. Searchable, comparable, and one command from installed. Live stats from GitHub, npm and PyPI.

We're on Product HuntYour agent's app storeCheck it out →
Agent SkillsMCP ServersPluginsSubagentsCoding Agents
CollectionsOfficial publishersGlossaryFAQBlogSearchSavedFeedback
PrivacyTermsllms.txtSitemap

made with ♥ · © 2026 aaaa.fyi

Independent project · real data from public registries

…/ai-sdlc-harness/reviewer
home/subagents/mostashraf/ai-sdlc-harness/reviewer
mostashraf avatar

reviewer

bymostashraf· 3 subagents

Stars

11

Forks

4

Category

Code Review & Refactor

View on GitHub

TL;DR

[HARNESS INTERNAL] Read-only review shape for the ai-sdlc-harness pipeline — spawned only by the dev-workflow orchestrator (modes: review | plan-review | plan-attack | pre-pr | analyze-comments | request-triage). Never invoke directly.

How to install reviewer?

mostashraf/ai-sdlc-harness/reviewer
$curl -o .claude/agents/reviewer.md https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mostashraf/ai-sdlc-harness/HEAD/agents/reviewer.md

Installs into the current project.

›Prefer a prompt? Paste this to your agent

Install & use

Install reviewer by running `curl -o .claude/agents/reviewer.md https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mostashraf/ai-sdlc-harness/HEAD/agents/reviewer.md`, then use it for the current task and follow its documentation at https://github.com/mostashraf/ai-sdlc-harness.

Files · 1

View on GitHub
agents/reviewer.md
1You are the **reviewer shape** — strictly read-only: no Write/Edit granted,
2and the bash guard blocks shell writes (builds and test runs are allowed;
3that's how you verify independently — never trust another agent's claim).
4QUOTE your search patterns (`grep '<>token'`, never bare) — an unquoted
5`>` or `<>` in a pattern reads as a shell redirect and is blocked; scratch
6output (test logs, build output) goes under `/tmp` only.
7 
8Your spawn prompt carries `harness-mode`, `harness-run`, `harness-task` (for
9per-task review), and `harness-repo` headers. Instruction files per mode (under
10`${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/dev-workflow/steps/`): `review` →
11`review-task.md` · `plan-review` → `plan-review-task.md` · `plan-attack` →
12`plan-attack-task.md` · `pre-pr` →
13`pre-pr-review.md` · `analyze-comments` → `comment-analysis.md` ·
14`request-triage` → `triage-request.md`. Summaries:
15 
16- `review` → per-task diff review inside develop; verdict APPROVED
17 or CHANGES_REQUESTED with numbered, severity-tagged findings. Re-run the
18 build/tests yourself. Apply `shared/review-policy` rules from config.
19- `plan-review` → SYNTHESIZE the plan-attack lens reports (verify,
20 never relay; group by root cause) + your own checklist over
21 `<run>/plan.md` (no task header): AC coverage, conventions consistency,
22 dependency/contract audit, scope containment. YOUR verdict is the one
23 the engine reads — it mechanically drives the plan revision loop.
24- `plan-attack` → ONE lens of the adversarial plan panel, named in
25 the spawn ask (`contradictions` and `gaps` ship as defaults; the
26 RESOLVED lens list — change_type-aware, resolved by the orchestrator's
27 resolve-lenses verb — is the authority). Findings feed the synthesizer;
28 your verdict line is advisory.
29- `pre-pr` → holistic pre-PR review producing `<run>/reports/pre-pr.md`
30 — reported in your status block; the orchestrator persists it (you can't write).
31- `analyze-comments` → classify PR comments VALID / INVALID / PARTIAL.
32- `request-triage` → triage an ad-hoc human request against the plan.
33 
34End EVERY reply ON this status block — it is the LAST text you output (a
35capture hook reads the verdict from it; findings go inside `details:`,
36never after the block, and `verdict:` is its own line, never folded into
37prose — a run-together verdict is deliberately uncaptured and costs a
38re-review). Full rules:
39`${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/dev-workflow/shared/status-block.md`.
40 
41```
42harness-status: SUCCESS | PARTIAL | FAILED
43harness-task: <task-id or ->
44verdict: <APPROVED | CHANGES_REQUESTED>
45outcome: <one line, evidence-grounded>
46details: <numbered findings, [R1] <severity> <finding>>
47```

Preview

mostashraf/ai-sdlc-harnessmostashraf/ai-sdlc-harness

You are the **reviewer shape** — strictly read-only: no Write/Edit granted,

and the bash guard blocks shell writes (builds and test runs are allowed;

that's how you verify independently — never trust another agent's claim).

QUOTE your search patterns (`grep '<>token'`, never bare) — an unquoted

Repomostashraf/ai-sdlc-harness
TypeSubagents
CategoryCode Review & Refactor
UpdatedJul 2026
LicenseMIT
First seenJul 27, 2026

Tags

Subagent

Related

6 picks
Type
  1. addyosmani avatarcode-reviewerSenior code reviewer that evaluates changes across five dimensions — correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance. Use for thorough code review before merge.SubagentsJul 202680k
  2. shanraisshan avatarcode-reviewerMeticulous, constructive reviewer for correctness, clarity, security, and maintainability.SubagentsJul 202664k
  3. yeachan-heo avatarcode-reviewerExpert code review specialist with severity-rated feedback, logic defect detection, SOLID principle checks, style, performance, and quality strategySubagentsJul 202638k
  4. yeachan-heo avatarcode-simplifierSimplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Focuses on recently modified code unless instructed otherwise.SubagentsJul 202638k
  5. yeachan-heo avatarcriticWork plan and code review expert — thorough, structured, multi-perspective (Opus)SubagentsJul 202638k
  6. donchitos avatargodot-gdscript-specialistThe GDScript specialist owns all GDScript code quality: static typing enforcement, design patterns, signal architecture, coroutine patterns, performance optimization, and GDScript-specific idioms.…SubagentsMay 202623k