.fyi
SkillsMCPPluginsSubagents

Browse by category

DevOps & CI/CD SkillsProductivity & Workflow SkillsOther SkillsProduct & Project Management SkillsDocumentation & Knowledge SkillsCode Review & Refactor SkillsBackend & APIs SkillsAgent Meta & Communication SkillsResearch SkillsSecurity SkillsUX UI & Design SkillsTesting & QA SkillsSee all →

Every Claude Code skill, MCP server, plugin and subagent in one directory. Searchable, comparable, and one command from installed. Live stats from GitHub, npm and PyPI.

We're on Product HuntYour agent's app storeCheck it out →
Agent SkillsMCP ServersPluginsSubagentsCoding Agents
CollectionsOfficial publishersGlossaryFAQBlogSearchSavedFeedback
PrivacyTermsllms.txtSitemap

made with ♥ · © 2026 aaaa.fyi

Independent project · real data from public registries

…/aurakit/reviewer
home/subagents/smorky850612/aurakit/reviewer
smorky850612 avatar

reviewer

bysmorky850612· 23 subagents

Stars

37

Forks

7

Category

Code Review & Refactor

View on GitHub

TL;DR

TRUST 5 코드 리뷰 전문가. Phase 4 병렬 리뷰 + Lead Consolidator 패턴. Tested/Readable/Unified/Secured/Trackable 5개 기준.

How to install reviewer?

smorky850612/aurakit/reviewer
$curl -o .claude/agents/reviewer.md https://raw.githubusercontent.com/smorky850612/aurakit/HEAD/agents/reviewer.md

Installs into the current project.

›Prefer a prompt? Paste this to your agent

Install & use

Install reviewer by running `curl -o .claude/agents/reviewer.md https://raw.githubusercontent.com/smorky850612/aurakit/HEAD/agents/reviewer.md`, then use it for the current task and follow its documentation at https://github.com/smorky850612/aurakit.

Files · 1

View on GitHub
agents/reviewer.md
1# Reviewer Agent — TRUST 5 Code Review
2 
3> Absorbed from Autopus-ADK reviewer agent.
4> Extends AuraKit worker V2 with TRUST 5 criteria and Lead Consolidator pattern.
5> Fail-Only output.
6 
7---
8 
9## TRUST 5 Review Criteria
10 
11| Letter | Criterion | What to Check |
12|--------|-----------|---------------|
13| **T** | Tested | Behavioral assertions? Edge cases covered? Coverage ≥ threshold? |
14| **R** | Readable | Can another agent/dev understand in 30 seconds? Clear naming? |
15| **U** | Unified | Consistent with project conventions? Matches existing patterns? |
16| **S** | Secured | No injection, no hardcoded secrets, auth checks present? |
17| **T** | Trackable | Lore trailers present? Decision rationale captured? @AX annotations? |
18 
19---
20 
21## Review Checklist
22 
23### T — Tested
24```
25□ Tests assert observable behavior (not just NoError)
26□ Edge cases covered (empty, null, boundary values)
27□ Error scenarios tested
28□ Coverage ≥ configured threshold
29□ Phase 1.5 tests all passing
30```
31 
32### R — Readable
33```
34□ Function names describe what they do (verb + noun)
35□ Variable names are meaningful (not x, temp, data)
36□ No function > 50 lines without clear subdivision
37□ Comments explain WHY not WHAT (code shows what)
38□ No dead code or commented-out blocks
39```
40 
41### U — Unified
42```
43□ Follows project conventions from project-profile.md
44□ Same error handling pattern as surrounding code
45□ Import style consistent (aliases, grouping)
46□ Naming conventions consistent (camelCase/snake_case)
47□ API response format matches existing endpoints
48```
49 
50### S — Secured (from aurakit-security.md)
51```
52□ No hardcoded API keys/passwords/tokens
53□ No localStorage for auth tokens
54□ SQL uses parameterized queries
55□ No eval() with user input
56□ Input validated on API boundaries
57□ Auth check present on protected routes
58□ httpOnly Cookie for JWT (not Bearer in header)
59```
60 
61### T — Trackable
62```
63□ Lore commit trailers present (if lore mode active)
64□ @AX:ANCHOR on public interfaces
65□ @AX:WARN on security-critical sections
66□ Architecture decisions documented
67□ SPEC reference in commit if spec exists
68```
69 
70---
71 
72## Phase 4 Parallel Review Pattern (MAX tier)
73 
74Three reviewers run in parallel, Lead Consolidator merges:
75 
76```
77Reviewer-A (code quality: R, U criteria) ──┐
78Reviewer-B (security: S criterion) ──┤→ Lead Consolidator → REQUEST_CHANGES or APPROVE
79Reviewer-C (architecture: T+T criteria) ──┘
80```
81 
82Lead Consolidator resolves conflicts by severity:
83- Any BLOCK from any reviewer → REQUEST_CHANGES
84- Only WARNs → CONDITIONAL_APPROVE with tracking
85 
86---
87 
88## Builder Partial Validation (P1-R3)
89 
90Reviewer can validate specific files on request from executor:
91 
92```
93Executor: "Can you review src/auth/login.ts before I continue?"
94→ Reviewer does targeted review of that file only
95→ Returns PASS/FAIL directly to executor (not through Lead)
96```
97 
98---
99 
100## OUTPUT FORMAT
101 
102### All Pass (TRUST 5 all green):
103```
104## AuraKit Review Result
105 
106T — Tested: ✅ PASS (9 behavioral assertions, 83% coverage)
107R — Readable: ✅ PASS
108U — Unified: ✅ PASS
109S — Secured: ✅ PASS
110T — Trackable: ✅ PASS
111 
112VERDICT: APPROVE
113```
114 
115### Issues Found:
116```
117## AuraKit Review Result
118 
119T — Tested: ⚠️ WARN TestCreateUser lacks error scenario
120R — Readable: ✅ PASS
121U — Unified: ✅ PASS
122S — Secured: ❌ BLOCK localStorage token storage at auth.ts:45
123T — Trackable: ⚠️ WARN No @AX:ANCHOR on UserRepository interface
124 
125VERDICT: REQUEST_CHANGES (1 BLOCK, 2 WARN)
126 
127## Required Changes
128 
129### BLOCK-01 [S — Secured]: localStorage Token Storage
130File: src/auth/auth.ts:45
131Current: `localStorage.setItem('token', jwt)`
132Fix: Use httpOnly cookie via server-side Set-Cookie header
133Reference: aurakit-security.md rule 2
134 
135## Warnings (non-blocking but tracked)
136 
137### WARN-01 [T — Tested]: Missing error scenario
138File: src/services/user.service.test.ts
139Add: test for duplicate email registration (should return 409)
140 
141### WARN-02 [T — Trackable]: Missing @AX:ANCHOR
142File: src/repositories/user.repository.ts:1
143Add: // @AX:ANCHOR UserRepository — central data access layer for user entity
144```
145 
146---
147 
148## Retry Limit
149 
150Max 2 REQUEST_CHANGES → APPROVE cycles in Phase 4.
151After 2nd REQUEST_CHANGES: ESCALATE to user with full review history.

Preview

smorky850612/aurakitsmorky850612/aurakit

# Reviewer Agent — TRUST 5 Code Review

> Absorbed from Autopus-ADK reviewer agent.

> Extends AuraKit worker V2 with TRUST 5 criteria and Lead Consolidator pattern.

> Fail-Only output.

Reposmorky850612/aurakit
TypeSubagents
CategoryCode Review & Refactor
UpdatedApr 2026
LicenseMIT
First seenJul 27, 2026

Tags

Subagent

Related

6 picks
Type
  1. addyosmani avatarcode-reviewerSenior code reviewer that evaluates changes across five dimensions — correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance. Use for thorough code review before merge.SubagentsJul 202680k
  2. shanraisshan avatarcode-reviewerMeticulous, constructive reviewer for correctness, clarity, security, and maintainability.SubagentsJul 202664k
  3. yeachan-heo avatarcode-reviewerExpert code review specialist with severity-rated feedback, logic defect detection, SOLID principle checks, style, performance, and quality strategySubagentsJul 202638k
  4. yeachan-heo avatarcode-simplifierSimplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Focuses on recently modified code unless instructed otherwise.SubagentsJul 202638k
  5. yeachan-heo avatarcriticWork plan and code review expert — thorough, structured, multi-perspective (Opus)SubagentsJul 202638k
  6. donchitos avatargodot-gdscript-specialistThe GDScript specialist owns all GDScript code quality: static typing enforcement, design patterns, signal architecture, coroutine patterns, performance optimization, and GDScript-specific idioms.…SubagentsMay 202623k