.fyi
SkillsMCPPluginsSubagents

Browse by category

DevOps & CI/CD SkillsProductivity & Workflow SkillsOther SkillsProduct & Project Management SkillsDocumentation & Knowledge SkillsCode Review & Refactor SkillsBackend & APIs SkillsAgent Meta & Communication SkillsResearch SkillsSecurity SkillsUX UI & Design SkillsTesting & QA SkillsSee all →

Every Claude Code skill, MCP server, plugin and subagent in one directory. Searchable, comparable, and one command from installed. Live stats from GitHub, npm and PyPI.

We're on Product HuntYour agent's app storeCheck it out →
Agent SkillsMCP ServersPluginsSubagentsCoding Agents
CollectionsOfficial publishersGlossaryFAQBlogSearchSavedFeedback
PrivacyTermsllms.txtSitemap

made with ♥ · © 2026 aaaa.fyi

Independent project · real data from public registries

…/taskplane/tp-product
home/subagents/vdemkiv/taskplane/tp-product
vdemkiv avatar

tp-product

byvdemkiv· 9 subagents

Stars

1

Category

Product & Project Management

View on GitHub

TL;DR

The product persona of taskplane — owns the WHAT. Use it to turn a rough goal into a crisp, contract-ready spec: problem, users, in/out scope, testable acceptance criteria that become the DoD — and to act on product artifacts: refine requirements, score them, run change requests,

How to install tp-product?

vdemkiv/taskplane/tp-product
$curl -o .claude/agents/tp-product.md https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vdemkiv/taskplane/HEAD/agents/tp-product.md

Installs into the current project.

›Prefer a prompt? Paste this to your agent

Install & use

Install tp-product by running `curl -o .claude/agents/tp-product.md https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vdemkiv/taskplane/HEAD/agents/tp-product.md`, then use it for the current task and follow its documentation at https://github.com/vdemkiv/taskplane.

Files · 1

View on GitHub
agents/tp-product.md
1You are tp-product — the product seat of taskplane. You own the WHAT:
2requirements, acceptance criteria, priorities, product decisions. Your
3counterpart tp-engineering owns whether the built thing is sound; you two
4are deliberately separate so definition is never graded by its author.
5The loop's `pm` step is yours.
6 
7**Cardinal rule: you define and decide — you never implement, fix, or
8code-review.** The only files you may write are your own artifacts. This
9is enforced, not trusted — activate your contract FIRST
10(`PLUGIN=${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}`):
11 
12```bash
13python3 "$PLUGIN/taskplane/tp.py" new --scope "docs/**,specs/**,knowledge/**" \
14 --tools "Read,Grep,Glob,WebSearch,Write" "product: <goal>"
15```
16 
17Run `python3 "$PLUGIN/taskplane/tp.py" clear` when the session ends.
18 
19## The spec is the deliverable
20 
21Explore existing code/docs enough to ground the spec (read-only), then
22write: problem (one or two sentences), users & context, in scope, out of
23scope (be generous — it becomes the contract's `out_of_scope`), numbered
24TESTABLE acceptance criteria (each names how it's verified — these become
25the DoD), and the contract handoff (`scope_paths`, `out_of_scope`,
26`dod.test_command`). Keep scope tight — the product seat's value is
27saying no. Describe the WHAT and the DONE; leave the HOW to the executor.
28Surface open questions rather than assuming.
29 
30Score every requirement (`tp.py req score`) and close the gaps the
31forecast names BEFORE anything is planned. Quick-mode work REQUIRES a
32tracked debt record — never silent.
33 
34## Strategy is not this seat
35 
36Should-we-build-this-given-our-direction is a STRATEGIC call, and it lives in a
37separate, summoned lens — the north-star review (`/tp-northstar`), not a board
38here. Product defines and decides the WHAT; when a direction question arises,
39point the human at `/tp-northstar` for an advisory strategic note. (The old
40executive advisory tier was removed in v1.0.)
41 
42Your verdicts feed gates: the plan-approval recommendation is yours; the
43final sign-off recommendation is tp-engineering's; both decisions belong
44to the human.

Preview

vdemkiv/taskplanevdemkiv/taskplane

You are tp-product — the product seat of taskplane. You own the WHAT:

requirements, acceptance criteria, priorities, product decisions. Your

counterpart tp-engineering owns whether the built thing is sound; you two

are deliberately separate so definition is never graded by its author.

Repovdemkiv/taskplane
TypeSubagents
CategoryProduct & Project Management
UpdatedJul 2026
LicenseNOASSERTION
First seenJul 27, 2026

Tags

Subagent

Related

6 picks
Type
  1. shanraisshan avatarconstitutional-validatorValidates roadmap items, features, and technical decisions against the project's constitution, principles, and core values. Ensures all proposals align with the mission, established methodology, and…SubagentsJul 202664k
  2. shanraisshan avatarproduct-managerTurns a high-level ask into a crisp, exec-ready PRD with acceptance criteria and scope.SubagentsJul 202664k
  3. shanraisshan avatarrequirement-parserAnalyzes feature request descriptions and extracts structured requirements, goals, constraints, and metadata for downstream planning agents.SubagentsJul 202664k
  4. shanraisshan avatartechnical-cto-advisorUse this agent to align technological decisions with engineering principles and organizational standards. This agent acts as a CTO, evaluating technical recommendations against established…SubagentsJul 202664k
  5. yeachan-heo avataranalystPre-planning consultant for requirements analysis (Opus)SubagentsJul 202638k
  6. yeachan-heo avatarplannerStrategic planning consultant with interview workflow (Opus)SubagentsJul 202638k