scholarly-citation

Name: scholarly-citation
Author: alfadur7

56stars10forks

How to install scholarly-citation?

alfadur7/llm-wiki-newsroom/scholarly-citation

$npx -y skills add alfadur7/llm-wiki-newsroom --skill scholarly-citation

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Verifiable-attribution and citation-discipline craft — atomic claim decomposition, evidence grading (primary/analysis/forecast tiers), claimant attribution, citation typing (cites/references/contradicts/defines), source anchoring (Xanadu). Use when writing or reviewing a referenc

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# scholarly-citation
2
3	Verifiable-attribution craft drawn from scholarly/scientific citation traditions (citation classification, typing, anchoring). It ensures every claim in this wiki is atomized, evidence-graded, attributed to a speaker, typed by citation meaning, and anchored to a source location — and therefore traceable. Unlike the three borrowed traditions (narrative, exec summary, encyclopedic neutrality), this craft synthesizes external sources into an atomic-claim schema and is the project's signature. `criteria.json` is the SoT for each criterion's definition, comparator, and source; wiki-global state (page existence·hub type·section titles) is injected by the orchestrator (`tools/_lint/source.py`). The schema literals (`## Key Claims`, `[fact]`, `cites:` etc.) are the wiki's actual schema markers and section headers.
4
5	## Claim atomization & grading (cit.grade-marker · cit.atomic · cit.composite-split)
6
7	One claim, one line, one utterance. Each line of `## Key Claims` (Key Claims) marks an evidence grade — `[fact]` (primary source), `[analysis]` (secondary analysis), `[forecast]` (forecast). Putting two subjects' claims on one line (joined by "and"/"&" or a comma series spanning two hubs; ko: the conjunctions `와`/`및`), or chaining verb phrases on one line ("…did, and …did"; ko: `~했고, ~했다`), breaks atomicity.
8
9	## Claimant attribution (cit.claimant-link · cit.claimant-valid · cit.speaker-link)
10
11	Every claim is bound to who said it. A `[[claimant]]` wikilink right after the grade marker names the speaker; anonymous subjects ("the government"·"industry sources"; ko `정부는`·`업계에서는`) are forbidden (WP:ASF — "avoid stating opinions as facts"; attribute them to a named source). A blockquote carries a speaker-attribution wikilink (APA author-date principle — identify the cited author). The attribution target must exist as a real page.
12
13	## Citation typing (cit.cite-type · cit.cite-distribution · cit.cite-type-hub)
14
15	Each line of `## Connections` (Connections) types the citation's meaning — `cites:` (direct grounds)·`references:` (context)·`contradicts:` (dispute)·`defines:` (definition). This extends scite Smart Citations' Supporting / Mentioning / Contrasting classes (with `defines:` added). If every line collapses to the default-safe `references:`, that signals avoidance of meaning classification. `defines:` points only to a concept hub.
16
17	## Source anchoring (cit.anchor · cit.anchor-valid)
18
19	An external-evidence citation anchors to the source's section — `[[slug#section]]` (ko: `[[slug#섹션]]`). This applies Xanadu citation anchoring (visible links to the precise source location, Ted Nelson) at the source level; a gradual migration, so 0% still passes (advisory), but the anchor target's slug and section must exist.
20
21	## Synthesis citation integrity (cit.cite-consistency · cit.grounding · cit.anchor-evidence)
22
23	A piece synthesizing many sources follows Select→Read→Cite discipline — the declared source set (frontmatter) is the top set, and both the sources read and the sources cited in the body are subsets of it.
24
25	- cit.cite-consistency — every source cited in the body is registered in the declared source list (body ⊆ declaration). Citing an undeclared source is an editorial slip (omission).
26	- cit.grounding — a source offered as representative evidence must actually be read and used. When at least one of the source's direct-quote / key-claim items appears in the body as a substring, that is objective evidence of having read it (writing from a one-line summary by memory/guess risks divergence from the source). The deterministic lint blocks only the "never read at all" extreme; full read-through rests on editor self-discipline.
27	- cit.anchor-evidence — when a direct quote is placed in representative evidence, mark the citation location with a source section anchor (`[[slug#section]]`; ko `[[slug#섹션]]`) — the same Xanadu principle applied to synthesis evidence. A gradual migration, so advisory.
28
29	## Schema meta-use (cit.grade-meta · cit.cite-type-meta)
30
31	The synthesizing piece's narrative consciously reflects the evidence-grade (`[fact]`·`[analysis]`·`[forecast]`) and citation-type (`cites:`·`references:`·`contradicts:`·`defines:`) schema attached to sources — noting which grades the evidence base rests on, the dominant claimant, strong coupling (cites) vs context (references) — to deepen attribution. Confine attribution strength to factual statements; do not let it spill into verdict conclusions. Deterministic measurement (`cou

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type

scholarly-citation

56stars10forks

View on GitHub

How to install scholarly-citation?

alfadur7/llm-wiki-newsroom/scholarly-citation

$npx -y skills add alfadur7/llm-wiki-newsroom --skill scholarly-citation

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# scholarly-citation
2
3	Verifiable-attribution craft drawn from scholarly/scientific citation traditions (citation classification, typing, anchoring). It ensures every claim in this wiki is atomized, evidence-graded, attributed to a speaker, typed by citation meaning, and anchored to a source location — and therefore traceable. Unlike the three borrowed traditions (narrative, exec summary, encyclopedic neutrality), this craft synthesizes external sources into an atomic-claim schema and is the project's signature. `criteria.json` is the SoT for each criterion's definition, comparator, and source; wiki-global state (page existence·hub type·section titles) is injected by the orchestrator (`tools/_lint/source.py`). The schema literals (`## Key Claims`, `[fact]`, `cites:` etc.) are the wiki's actual schema markers and section headers.
4
5	## Claim atomization & grading (cit.grade-marker · cit.atomic · cit.composite-split)
6
7	One claim, one line, one utterance. Each line of `## Key Claims` (Key Claims) marks an evidence grade — `[fact]` (primary source), `[analysis]` (secondary analysis), `[forecast]` (forecast). Putting two subjects' claims on one line (joined by "and"/"&" or a comma series spanning two hubs; ko: the conjunctions `와`/`및`), or chaining verb phrases on one line ("…did, and …did"; ko: `~했고, ~했다`), breaks atomicity.
8
9	## Claimant attribution (cit.claimant-link · cit.claimant-valid · cit.speaker-link)
10
11	Every claim is bound to who said it. A `[[claimant]]` wikilink right after the grade marker names the speaker; anonymous subjects ("the government"·"industry sources"; ko `정부는`·`업계에서는`) are forbidden (WP:ASF — "avoid stating opinions as facts"; attribute them to a named source). A blockquote carries a speaker-attribution wikilink (APA author-date principle — identify the cited author). The attribution target must exist as a real page.
12
13	## Citation typing (cit.cite-type · cit.cite-distribution · cit.cite-type-hub)
14
15	Each line of `## Connections` (Connections) types the citation's meaning — `cites:` (direct grounds)·`references:` (context)·`contradicts:` (dispute)·`defines:` (definition). This extends scite Smart Citations' Supporting / Mentioning / Contrasting classes (with `defines:` added). If every line collapses to the default-safe `references:`, that signals avoidance of meaning classification. `defines:` points only to a concept hub.
16
17	## Source anchoring (cit.anchor · cit.anchor-valid)
18
19	An external-evidence citation anchors to the source's section — `[[slug#section]]` (ko: `[[slug#섹션]]`). This applies Xanadu citation anchoring (visible links to the precise source location, Ted Nelson) at the source level; a gradual migration, so 0% still passes (advisory), but the anchor target's slug and section must exist.
20
21	## Synthesis citation integrity (cit.cite-consistency · cit.grounding · cit.anchor-evidence)
22
23	A piece synthesizing many sources follows Select→Read→Cite discipline — the declared source set (frontmatter) is the top set, and both the sources read and the sources cited in the body are subsets of it.
24
25	- cit.cite-consistency — every source cited in the body is registered in the declared source list (body ⊆ declaration). Citing an undeclared source is an editorial slip (omission).
26	- cit.grounding — a source offered as representative evidence must actually be read and used. When at least one of the source's direct-quote / key-claim items appears in the body as a substring, that is objective evidence of having read it (writing from a one-line summary by memory/guess risks divergence from the source). The deterministic lint blocks only the "never read at all" extreme; full read-through rests on editor self-discipline.
27	- cit.anchor-evidence — when a direct quote is placed in representative evidence, mark the citation location with a source section anchor (`[[slug#section]]`; ko `[[slug#섹션]]`) — the same Xanadu principle applied to synthesis evidence. A gradual migration, so advisory.
28
29	## Schema meta-use (cit.grade-meta · cit.cite-type-meta)
30
31	The synthesizing piece's narrative consciously reflects the evidence-grade (`[fact]`·`[analysis]`·`[forecast]`) and citation-type (`cites:`·`references:`·`contradicts:`·`defines:`) schema attached to sources — noting which grades the evidence base rests on, the dominant claimant, strong coupling (cites) vs context (references) — to deepen attribution. Confine attribution strength to factual statements; do not let it spill into verdict conclusions. Deterministic measurement (`cou

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type