$npx -y skills add anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill customer-researchMulti-source research on a customer question or topic with source attribution. Use when a customer asks something you need to look up, investigating whether a bug has been reported before, checking what was previously told to a specific account, or gathering background before dra
| 1 | # /customer-research |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see [CONNECTORS.md](../../CONNECTORS.md). |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Multi-source research on a customer question, product topic, or account-related inquiry. Synthesizes findings from all available sources with clear attribution and confidence scoring. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | ## Usage |
| 8 | |
| 9 | ``` |
| 10 | /customer-research <question or topic> |
| 11 | ``` |
| 12 | |
| 13 | ## Workflow |
| 14 | |
| 15 | ### 1. Parse the Research Request |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Identify what type of research is needed: |
| 18 | - **Customer question**: Something a customer has asked that needs an answer (e.g., "Does our product support SSO with Okta?") |
| 19 | - **Issue investigation**: Background on a reported problem (e.g., "Has this bug been reported before? What's the known workaround?") |
| 20 | - **Account context**: History with a specific customer (e.g., "What did we tell Acme Corp last time they asked about this?") |
| 21 | - **Topic research**: General topic relevant to support work (e.g., "Best practices for webhook retry logic") |
| 22 | |
| 23 | Before searching, clarify what you're actually trying to find: |
| 24 | - Is this a factual question with a definitive answer? |
| 25 | - Is this a contextual question requiring multiple perspectives? |
| 26 | - Is this an exploratory question where the scope is still being defined? |
| 27 | - Who is the audience for the answer (internal team, customer, leadership)? |
| 28 | |
| 29 | ### 2. Search Available Sources |
| 30 | |
| 31 | Search systematically through the source tiers below, adapting to what is connected. Don't stop at the first result — cross-reference across sources. |
| 32 | |
| 33 | **Tier 1 — Official Internal Sources (highest confidence):** |
| 34 | - ~~knowledge base (if connected): product docs, runbooks, FAQs, policy documents |
| 35 | - ~~cloud storage: internal documents, specs, guides, past research |
| 36 | - Product roadmap (internal-facing): feature timelines, priorities |
| 37 | |
| 38 | **Tier 2 — Organizational Context:** |
| 39 | - ~~CRM notes: account notes, activity history, previous answers, opportunity details |
| 40 | - ~~support platform (if connected): previous resolutions, known issues, workarounds |
| 41 | - Meeting notes: previous discussions, decisions, commitments |
| 42 | |
| 43 | **Tier 3 — Team Communications:** |
| 44 | - ~~chat: search for the topic in relevant channels; check if teammates have discussed or answered this before |
| 45 | - ~~email: search for previous correspondence on this topic |
| 46 | - Calendar notes: meeting agendas and post-meeting notes |
| 47 | |
| 48 | **Tier 4 — External Sources:** |
| 49 | - Web search: official documentation, blog posts, community forums |
| 50 | - Public knowledge bases, help centers, release notes |
| 51 | - Third-party documentation: integration partners, complementary tools |
| 52 | |
| 53 | **Tier 5 — Inferred or Analogical (use when direct sources don't yield answers):** |
| 54 | - Similar situations: how similar questions were handled before |
| 55 | - Analogous customers: what worked for comparable accounts |
| 56 | - General best practices: industry standards and norms |
| 57 | |
| 58 | ### 3. Synthesize Findings |
| 59 | |
| 60 | Compile results into a structured research brief: |
| 61 | |
| 62 | ``` |
| 63 | ## Research: [Question/Topic] |
| 64 | |
| 65 | ### Answer |
| 66 | [Clear, direct answer to the question — lead with the bottom line] |
| 67 | |
| 68 | **Confidence:** [High / Medium / Low] |
| 69 | [Explain what drives the confidence level] |
| 70 | |
| 71 | ### Key Findings |
| 72 | |
| 73 | **From [Source 1]:** |
| 74 | - [Finding with specific detail] |
| 75 | - [Finding with specific detail] |
| 76 | |
| 77 | **From [Source 2]:** |
| 78 | - [Finding with specific detail] |
| 79 | |
| 80 | ### Context & Nuance |
| 81 | [Any caveats, edge cases, or additional context that matters] |
| 82 | |
| 83 | ### Sources |
| 84 | 1. [Source name/link] — [what it contributed] |
| 85 | 2. [Source name/link] — [what it contributed] |
| 86 | 3. [Source name/link] — [what it contributed] |
| 87 | |
| 88 | ### Gaps & Unknowns |
| 89 | - [What couldn't be confirmed] |
| 90 | - [What might need verification from a subject matter expert] |
| 91 | |
| 92 | ### Recommended Next Steps |
| 93 | - [Action if the answer needs to go to a customer] |
| 94 | - [Action if further research is needed] |
| 95 | - [Who to consult for verification if needed] |
| 96 | ``` |
| 97 | |
| 98 | ### 4. Handle Insufficient Sources |
| 99 | |
| 100 | If no connected sources yield results: |
| 101 | |
| 102 | - Perform web research on the topic |
| 103 | - Ask the user for internal context: |
| 104 | - "I couldn't find this in connected sources. Do you have internal docs or knowledge base articles about this?" |
| 105 | - "Has your team discussed this topic before? Any ~~chat channels I should check?" |
| 106 | - "Is there a subject matter expert who would know the answer?" |
| 107 | - Be transparent about limitations: |
| 108 | - "This answer is based on web research only — please verify against your internal documentation before sharing with the customer." |
| 109 | - "I found a possible answer but couldn't confirm it from an authoritative internal source." |
| 110 | |
| 111 | ### 5. Customer-Facing Considerations |
| 112 | |
| 113 | If the research is to answer a customer question: |
| 114 | |
| 115 | - Flag if the answer involves product roadmap, pricing, legal, or security topics that may need revi |