$npx -y skills add DevelopersGlobal/ai-agent-skills --skill research-and-summarizeDistill complex topics into layered, actionable summaries. Start with the key insight, layer in detail, end with recommended next action.
| 1 | ## Overview |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Information overload is the default state. This skill transforms any research task into a structured summary: headline insight first, context second, detail third, action last. Designed for decision-makers who need clarity, not comprehensiveness. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | ## When to Use |
| 6 | |
| 7 | - Summarizing technical documentation or papers |
| 8 | - Researching a technology choice |
| 9 | - Briefing a team on a topic |
| 10 | - Distilling a long document for a specific decision |
| 11 | |
| 12 | ## Process |
| 13 | |
| 14 | ### Step 1: Define the Research Question |
| 15 | |
| 16 | 1. State the specific question being answered: *"Should we use Kafka or RabbitMQ for our event pipeline?"* |
| 17 | 2. State who the answer is for and what decision it enables. |
| 18 | 3. This scopes the research — don't gather information beyond what the decision needs. |
| 19 | |
| 20 | **Verify:** Research question is specific enough to have a clear answer. |
| 21 | |
| 22 | ### Step 2: Gather and Evaluate Sources |
| 23 | |
| 24 | 4. Identify 3–5 high-quality, authoritative sources. |
| 25 | 5. For each source, note: recency, authority, potential bias. |
| 26 | 6. Cross-reference key claims across sources. |
| 27 | 7. Flag conflicting information — don't silently pick one side. |
| 28 | |
| 29 | **Verify:** Key claims are supported by at least 2 independent sources. |
| 30 | |
| 31 | ### Step 3: Write the Layered Summary |
| 32 | |
| 33 | 8. **Headline (1 sentence)**: The single most important insight. |
| 34 | 9. **Key findings (3–5 bullets)**: Supporting evidence for the headline. |
| 35 | 10. **Context and nuance (1–2 paragraphs)**: Caveats, tradeoffs, conditions under which the headline doesn't hold. |
| 36 | 11. **What we don't know**: Gaps in the available information. |
| 37 | 12. **Recommended action**: Given the findings, what should the reader do next? |
| 38 | |
| 39 | **Deliver:** A structured summary with all 5 sections. |
| 40 | |
| 41 | ### Step 4: Cite Sources |
| 42 | |
| 43 | 13. Every factual claim is linked to a source. |
| 44 | 14. Include the date of each source (recency matters in fast-moving fields). |
| 45 | |
| 46 | **Verify:** Every claim has a citation. |
| 47 | |
| 48 | ## Common Rationalizations (and Rebuttals) |
| 49 | |
| 50 | | Excuse | Rebuttal | |
| 51 | |--------|----------| |
| 52 | | "The topic is too complex to summarize" | The goal is to enable a decision, not to be comprehensive. Scope to the decision. | |
| 53 | | "I'll just share the links" | Links are not summaries. Distillation is the value. | |
| 54 | |
| 55 | ## Verification |
| 56 | |
| 57 | - [ ] Research question defined before research begins |
| 58 | - [ ] Key claims cross-referenced across 2+ sources |
| 59 | - [ ] Summary has: headline, findings, context, unknowns, action |
| 60 | - [ ] Every factual claim has a citation with date |
| 61 | |
| 62 | ## References |
| 63 | |
| 64 | - [think-before-coding skill](../think-before-coding/SKILL.md) |
| 65 | - [idea-to-spec skill](../idea-to-spec/SKILL.md) |