medical-imaging-review

Name: medical-imaging-review
Author: LeonChaoX

698stars61forks

How to install medical-imaging-review?

leonchaox/qinyan-academic-skills/medical-imaging-review

$npx -y skills add LeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skills --skill medical-imaging-review

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Write comprehensive literature reviews for medical imaging AI research. Use when writing survey papers, systematic reviews, or literature analyses on topics like segmentation, detection, classification in CT, MRI, X-ray, ultrasound, or pathology imaging. Triggers on requests for

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# Medical Imaging AI Literature Review Skill
2
3	Write comprehensive literature reviews following a systematic 7-phase workflow.
4
5	## Quick Start
6
7	1. Initialize project with three core files:
8	- `CLAUDE.md` - Writing guidelines and terminology
9	- `IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md` - Staged execution plan
10	- `manuscript_draft.md` - Main manuscript
11
12	2. Follow the 7-phase workflow (see [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md))
13
14	3. Use domain-specific templates (see [references/DOMAINS.md](references/DOMAINS.md))
15
16	---
17
18	## Core Principles
19
20	### Writing Style
21	- Hedging language: "may", "suggests", "appears to", "has shown promising results"
22	- Avoid absolutes: Never say "X is the best method"
23	- Citation support: Every claim needs reference
24	- Limitations: Each method section needs a Limitations paragraph
25
26	### Required Elements
27	- Key Points box (3-5 bullets) after title
28	- Comparison table for each major section
29	- Performance metrics: Dice (0.XXX), HD95 (X.XX mm)
30	- Figure placeholders with detailed captions
31	- References: 80-120 typical, organized by topic
32
33	### Paragraph Structure
34	```
35	Topic sentence (main claim)
36	→ Supporting evidence (citations + data)
37	→ Analysis (critical evaluation)
38	→ Transition to next paragraph
39	```
40
41	---
42
43	## Literature Sources
44
45	Use multi-source strategy for comprehensive coverage:
46
47	\| Source \| Best For \| Tools \|
48	\|--------\|----------\|-------\|
49	\| ArXiv \| Latest DL methods, preprints \| `search_papers`, `read_paper` \|
50	\| PubMed \| Clinical validation, peer-reviewed \| `pubmed_search_articles` \|
51	\| Zotero \| Existing library, organized refs \| `zotero_search_items` \|
52
53	For MCP configuration details, see [references/MCP_SETUP.md](references/MCP_SETUP.md).
54
55	---
56
57	## Standard Review Structure
58
59	```markdown
60	# [Title]: State of the Art and Future Directions
61
62	## Key Points
63	- [3-5 bullets summarizing main findings]
64
65	## Abstract
66
67	## 1. Introduction
68	### 1.1 Clinical Background
69	### 1.2 Technical Challenges
70	### 1.3 Scope and Contributions
71
72	## 2. Datasets and Evaluation Metrics
73	### 2.1 Public Datasets (Table 1)
74	### 2.2 Evaluation Metrics
75
76	## 3. Deep Learning Methods
77	### 3.1 [Category 1]
78	### 3.2 [Category 2]
79	(Table 2: Method Comparison)
80
81	## 4. Downstream Applications
82
83	## 5. Commercial Products & Clinical Translation (Table 3)
84
85	## 6. Discussion
86	### 6.1 Current Limitations
87	### 6.2 Future Directions
88
89	## 7. Conclusion
90
91	## References
92	```
93
94	---
95
96	## Method Description Template
97
98	```markdown
99	### 3.X [Method Category]
100
101	[1-2 paragraph introduction with motivation]
102
103	[Method Name]: [Author] et al. [ref] proposed [method], which [innovation]:
104	- [Key component 1]
105	- [Key component 2]
106	Achieves Dice of X.XX on [dataset].
107
108	Limitations: Despite advantages, [category] methods face:
109	(1) [limit 1]; (2) [limit 2].
110	```
111
112	---
113
114	## Citation Patterns
115
116	```markdown
117	# Data citation
118	"...achieved Dice of 0.89 [23]"
119
120	# Method citation
121	"Gu et al. [45] proposed..."
122
123	# Multi-citation
124	"Several studies demonstrated... [12, 15, 23]"
125
126	# Comparative
127	"While [12] focused on..., [15] addressed..."
128	```
129
130	---
131
132	## Reference Files
133
134	\| File \| Purpose \|
135	\|------\|---------\|
136	\| [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md) \| Detailed 7-phase workflow \|
137	\| [references/TEMPLATES.md](references/TEMPLATES.md) \| CLAUDE.md and IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md templates \|
138	\| [references/DOMAINS.md](references/DOMAINS.md) \| Domain-specific method categories \|
139	\| [references/MCP_SETUP.md](references/MCP_SETUP.md) \| MCP server configuration \|
140	\| [references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md](references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md) \| Pre-submission quality checklist \|

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type

medical-imaging-review

698stars61forks

View on GitHub

How to install medical-imaging-review?

leonchaox/qinyan-academic-skills/medical-imaging-review

$npx -y skills add LeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skills --skill medical-imaging-review

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# Medical Imaging AI Literature Review Skill
2
3	Write comprehensive literature reviews following a systematic 7-phase workflow.
4
5	## Quick Start
6
7	1. Initialize project with three core files:
8	- `CLAUDE.md` - Writing guidelines and terminology
9	- `IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md` - Staged execution plan
10	- `manuscript_draft.md` - Main manuscript
11
12	2. Follow the 7-phase workflow (see [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md))
13
14	3. Use domain-specific templates (see [references/DOMAINS.md](references/DOMAINS.md))
15
16	---
17
18	## Core Principles
19
20	### Writing Style
21	- Hedging language: "may", "suggests", "appears to", "has shown promising results"
22	- Avoid absolutes: Never say "X is the best method"
23	- Citation support: Every claim needs reference
24	- Limitations: Each method section needs a Limitations paragraph
25
26	### Required Elements
27	- Key Points box (3-5 bullets) after title
28	- Comparison table for each major section
29	- Performance metrics: Dice (0.XXX), HD95 (X.XX mm)
30	- Figure placeholders with detailed captions
31	- References: 80-120 typical, organized by topic
32
33	### Paragraph Structure
34	```
35	Topic sentence (main claim)
36	→ Supporting evidence (citations + data)
37	→ Analysis (critical evaluation)
38	→ Transition to next paragraph
39	```
40
41	---
42
43	## Literature Sources
44
45	Use multi-source strategy for comprehensive coverage:
46
47	\| Source \| Best For \| Tools \|
48	\|--------\|----------\|-------\|
49	\| ArXiv \| Latest DL methods, preprints \| `search_papers`, `read_paper` \|
50	\| PubMed \| Clinical validation, peer-reviewed \| `pubmed_search_articles` \|
51	\| Zotero \| Existing library, organized refs \| `zotero_search_items` \|
52
53	For MCP configuration details, see [references/MCP_SETUP.md](references/MCP_SETUP.md).
54
55	---
56
57	## Standard Review Structure
58
59	```markdown
60	# [Title]: State of the Art and Future Directions
61
62	## Key Points
63	- [3-5 bullets summarizing main findings]
64
65	## Abstract
66
67	## 1. Introduction
68	### 1.1 Clinical Background
69	### 1.2 Technical Challenges
70	### 1.3 Scope and Contributions
71
72	## 2. Datasets and Evaluation Metrics
73	### 2.1 Public Datasets (Table 1)
74	### 2.2 Evaluation Metrics
75
76	## 3. Deep Learning Methods
77	### 3.1 [Category 1]
78	### 3.2 [Category 2]
79	(Table 2: Method Comparison)
80
81	## 4. Downstream Applications
82
83	## 5. Commercial Products & Clinical Translation (Table 3)
84
85	## 6. Discussion
86	### 6.1 Current Limitations
87	### 6.2 Future Directions
88
89	## 7. Conclusion
90
91	## References
92	```
93
94	---
95
96	## Method Description Template
97
98	```markdown
99	### 3.X [Method Category]
100
101	[1-2 paragraph introduction with motivation]
102
103	[Method Name]: [Author] et al. [ref] proposed [method], which [innovation]:
104	- [Key component 1]
105	- [Key component 2]
106	Achieves Dice of X.XX on [dataset].
107
108	Limitations: Despite advantages, [category] methods face:
109	(1) [limit 1]; (2) [limit 2].
110	```
111
112	---
113
114	## Citation Patterns
115
116	```markdown
117	# Data citation
118	"...achieved Dice of 0.89 [23]"
119
120	# Method citation
121	"Gu et al. [45] proposed..."
122
123	# Multi-citation
124	"Several studies demonstrated... [12, 15, 23]"
125
126	# Comparative
127	"While [12] focused on..., [15] addressed..."
128	```
129
130	---
131
132	## Reference Files
133
134	\| File \| Purpose \|
135	\|------\|---------\|
136	\| [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md) \| Detailed 7-phase workflow \|
137	\| [references/TEMPLATES.md](references/TEMPLATES.md) \| CLAUDE.md and IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md templates \|
138	\| [references/DOMAINS.md](references/DOMAINS.md) \| Domain-specific method categories \|
139	\| [references/MCP_SETUP.md](references/MCP_SETUP.md) \| MCP server configuration \|
140	\| [references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md](references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md) \| Pre-submission quality checklist \|

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type