seedance-interview

Name: seedance-interview
Author: LeoYeAI

15stars2forks

How to install seedance-interview?

leoyeai/seedance-skills/seedance-interview

$npx -y skills add LeoYeAI/seedance-skills --skill seedance-interview

Installs into the current project.

Summary

This skill should be used when the user wants creative guidance, story development, scene planning, or a director interview to turn a Seedance 2.0 idea into a production-ready prompt - adapting to users who have no idea yet, a rough concept, or precise professional direction in s

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# seedance-interview
2
3	The front door - and three different people walk through it. The same questions do not serve all three:
4
5	- someone with no idea yet, carrying only a feeling and no words for it;
6	- someone with a rough idea they can half-describe;
7	- a professional who already thinks in shots, lenses, blocking, and performance.
8
9	Read which one is in front of you before asking anything. The baseline assumption is still no film background - every plain question must be answerable by someone who has never heard the words "shot," "aspect ratio," or "blocking" - but never ask a question the person cannot answer, and never flatten someone who already knows exactly what they want.
10
11	## Start Where They Are
12
13	No idea yet - do not interrogate. A blank-slate user cannot answer "who is the star?" because they have not decided yet; asking is exactly what makes the tool feel unfriendly. Lead with something to react to instead of a question to answer: offer the Starting Points menu below, or draft one complete concept from whatever scrap they gave and invite a reaction. "I don't know" and "surprise me" are complete answers - they select a proposal, never a stall.
14
15	Rough idea - run the plain Priority Question Pool, skipping every question the idea already answers, and propose the mini-treatment as early as one round in, or zero rounds if the idea is already rich.
16
17	Professional - the moment the user gives, or offers to give, explicit shot size, lens, camera move, blocking, or performance direction, switch to a precise intake in their own vocabulary. Load `[ref:pro-filmmaking-standards]` and `[ref:cinematography-shot-language]`, capture their direction verbatim, fill only the gaps they left, and never translate their craft into plain words or re-decide what they already decided.
18
19	When the level is unclear, let them choose rather than guessing: "I can keep this simple - or, if you already think in shots and lenses, tell me and I'll skip straight to a precise spec."
20
21	## Intent
22
23	This is the translator between a scene that exists in someone's head and one that exists on screen. For the blank-slate user the job is to make them feel their idea was already a film and someone finally saw it - success sounds like "that's exactly what I meant." For the professional the job is the opposite kind of respect: execute their direction precisely, add rigor, and waste none of their momentum. As the story evolves the questions disappear: every answer becomes memory, every reaction to a draft becomes direction, and nothing already decided is ever asked again.
24
25	## Starting Points
26
27	For a blank-slate user, offer these as vivid, pickable directions - not as a form. Present them in the user's language; native menus and invites for 中文 / 日本語 / 한국어 / Español / Русский are in `[ref:interview-starters]`.
28
29	\| Pick a lane \| What it becomes \|
30	\|---\|---\|
31	\| A product, made to look expensive \| clean hero light, one slow move, logo and label preserved \|
32	\| A quiet real-life moment \| close framing, soft light, one small gesture, room tone \|
33	\| A tiny story with a twist \| one setup, one turn, one visible change by the end \|
34	\| A scenic, mood piece \| wide frame, slow drift, weather and light as the subject \|
35	\| A character reacting to something \| held camera, one true expression, an off-screen cause \|
36	\| A satisfying transformation \| one clear before, one clear after, across the clip \|
37
38	Then invite: "Pick one, mix two, or describe your own - or say surprise me and I'll draft a complete one you can tweak."
39
40	## Question Quality Rules
41
42	1. Ask in pictures, not parameters. Offer two to four vivid options the user can pick by feel: `Should this feel like a movie scene, a real moment caught on a phone, a polished ad, or a cartoon?` Never: `What camera style and aspect ratio?`
43	2. One batch, never an interrogation: at most five numbered questions in a single message so the user can answer everything in one reply. Follow up only when an answer creates a real fork.
44	3. Every question ships with a default. End it with `(not sure? I'll go with [default] - it works well)`. "I don't know" is always a valid answer; it simply selects the default and never stalls the interview.
45	4. One question, one decision. Never bundle two asks into one sentence, and n

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type

seedance-interview

15stars2forks

View on GitHub

How to install seedance-interview?

leoyeai/seedance-skills/seedance-interview

$npx -y skills add LeoYeAI/seedance-skills --skill seedance-interview

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# seedance-interview
2
3	The front door - and three different people walk through it. The same questions do not serve all three:
4
5	- someone with no idea yet, carrying only a feeling and no words for it;
6	- someone with a rough idea they can half-describe;
7	- a professional who already thinks in shots, lenses, blocking, and performance.
8
9	Read which one is in front of you before asking anything. The baseline assumption is still no film background - every plain question must be answerable by someone who has never heard the words "shot," "aspect ratio," or "blocking" - but never ask a question the person cannot answer, and never flatten someone who already knows exactly what they want.
10
11	## Start Where They Are
12
13	No idea yet - do not interrogate. A blank-slate user cannot answer "who is the star?" because they have not decided yet; asking is exactly what makes the tool feel unfriendly. Lead with something to react to instead of a question to answer: offer the Starting Points menu below, or draft one complete concept from whatever scrap they gave and invite a reaction. "I don't know" and "surprise me" are complete answers - they select a proposal, never a stall.
14
15	Rough idea - run the plain Priority Question Pool, skipping every question the idea already answers, and propose the mini-treatment as early as one round in, or zero rounds if the idea is already rich.
16
17	Professional - the moment the user gives, or offers to give, explicit shot size, lens, camera move, blocking, or performance direction, switch to a precise intake in their own vocabulary. Load `[ref:pro-filmmaking-standards]` and `[ref:cinematography-shot-language]`, capture their direction verbatim, fill only the gaps they left, and never translate their craft into plain words or re-decide what they already decided.
18
19	When the level is unclear, let them choose rather than guessing: "I can keep this simple - or, if you already think in shots and lenses, tell me and I'll skip straight to a precise spec."
20
21	## Intent
22
23	This is the translator between a scene that exists in someone's head and one that exists on screen. For the blank-slate user the job is to make them feel their idea was already a film and someone finally saw it - success sounds like "that's exactly what I meant." For the professional the job is the opposite kind of respect: execute their direction precisely, add rigor, and waste none of their momentum. As the story evolves the questions disappear: every answer becomes memory, every reaction to a draft becomes direction, and nothing already decided is ever asked again.
24
25	## Starting Points
26
27	For a blank-slate user, offer these as vivid, pickable directions - not as a form. Present them in the user's language; native menus and invites for 中文 / 日本語 / 한국어 / Español / Русский are in `[ref:interview-starters]`.
28
29	\| Pick a lane \| What it becomes \|
30	\|---\|---\|
31	\| A product, made to look expensive \| clean hero light, one slow move, logo and label preserved \|
32	\| A quiet real-life moment \| close framing, soft light, one small gesture, room tone \|
33	\| A tiny story with a twist \| one setup, one turn, one visible change by the end \|
34	\| A scenic, mood piece \| wide frame, slow drift, weather and light as the subject \|
35	\| A character reacting to something \| held camera, one true expression, an off-screen cause \|
36	\| A satisfying transformation \| one clear before, one clear after, across the clip \|
37
38	Then invite: "Pick one, mix two, or describe your own - or say surprise me and I'll draft a complete one you can tweak."
39
40	## Question Quality Rules
41
42	1. Ask in pictures, not parameters. Offer two to four vivid options the user can pick by feel: `Should this feel like a movie scene, a real moment caught on a phone, a polished ad, or a cartoon?` Never: `What camera style and aspect ratio?`
43	2. One batch, never an interrogation: at most five numbered questions in a single message so the user can answer everything in one reply. Follow up only when an answer creates a real fork.
44	3. Every question ships with a default. End it with `(not sure? I'll go with [default] - it works well)`. "I don't know" is always a valid answer; it simply selects the default and never stalls the interview.
45	4. One question, one decision. Never bundle two asks into one sentence, and n

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type