strategist

Name: strategist
Author: lishix520

1.1kstars116forks

How to install strategist?

lishix520/academic-paper-skills/strategist

$npx -y skills add lishix520/academic-paper-skills --skill strategist

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) de

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# Academic Paper Strategist
2
3	## Overview
4
5	This skill provides a systematic framework for strategic planning of academic papers in philosophy and interdisciplinary research. It guides you through three phases—from platform selection to optimized outline—with AI-driven literature search, research gap identification, originality assessment, and quality-controlled outline design.
6
7	Output: A detailed, review-ready paper outline with supporting documentation (platform style guide, literature review, gap analysis, reviewer assessment).
8
9	Companion Skill: Use academic-paper-composer to execute the outline and write the full paper.
10
11	---
12
13	## When to Use This Skill
14
15	Use academic-paper-strategist when you need to:
16
17	Planning Stage:
18	- Design a research paper from initial idea to structured outline
19	- Identify a suitable publication platform (PhilArchive, arXiv, etc.)
20	- Understand writing standards for a specific preprint platform
21
22	Research Stage:
23	- Conduct systematic literature search
24	- Identify research gaps with evidence
25	- Assess originality of your research idea
26	- Predict potential impact
27
28	Design Stage:
29	- Structure paper chapters and arguments
30	- Optimize outline from reviewer perspective
31	- Prepare submission-ready strategy
32
33	Triggers:
34	- "Plan a paper on [topic]"
35	- "Help me design a paper about [subject]"
36	- "Identify research gaps in [field]"
37	- "Is this idea original?"
38	- "What platform should I submit to?"
39
40	---
41
42	## Workflow Overview
43
44	```
45	Phase 1: PLATFORM ANALYSIS (Target Selection + Style Learning)
46	↓
47	Phase 2: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK (AI-Driven Gap Identification)
48	↓
49	Phase 3: OUTLINE OPTIMIZATION (Quality-Controlled Design)
50	↓
51	Output: Detailed Outline + Supporting Documentation
52	```
53
54	Quality Gates: 3 validation checkpoints ensure each phase meets standards before proceeding.
55
56	---
57
58	## Phase 1: Platform Analysis
59
60	### Goal
61	Identify the optimal submission platform and understand its writing standards through systematic sample paper analysis.
62
63	### Input Required from User
64	- Core research idea or topic (brief description)
65	- Target platform (optional - if unclear, I'll recommend)
66	- Field/discipline (philosophy, cognitive science, interdisciplinary, etc.)
67
68	### Workflow
69
70	#### Step 1.1: Platform Selection (If Needed)
71
72	If target platform unclear, I will:
73
74	1. List candidate platforms based on research content:
75	- PhilArchive/PhilPapers: Philosophy papers, phenomenology, metaphysics
76	- arXiv (cs.AI, q-bio.NC): Computational, neuroscience, AI-related
77	- PhilSci-Archive: Philosophy of science, formal methods
78	- PsyArXiv: Psychology, cognitive science
79	- SocArXiv: Social sciences, interdisciplinary
80
81	2. Evaluate each platform:
82	- Subject area alignment (does your topic fit?)
83	- Methodology match (philosophical/empirical/computational)
84	- Acceptance criteria
85	- Typical review timeline
86
87	3. Provide recommendation with reasoning
88
89	4. Decision Point 1: You confirm platform or suggest alternative
90
91	#### Step 1.2: Sample Paper Search (AI-Driven, Quality-Controlled)
92
93	I will conduct multi-dimensional search for 8-10 representative papers:
94
95	Search Strategy (load `references/search_strategy.md` for details):
96
97	Time Dimension:
98	- Recent (last 6 months): 3 papers - capture current trends
99	- Current (1-2 years): 3 papers - established standards
100	- Classic (highly cited): 2 papers - quality benchmarks
101
102	Relevance Dimension:
103	- Use keyword combinations from your topic
104	- Score each paper 0-10 for relevance
105	- Retain only papers scoring ≥7/10
106
107	Diversity Dimension:
108	- Multiple authors (≥5 unique)
109	- Different research perspectives
110	- Varied paper lengths
111
112	Tools Used:
113	- Exa MCP (semantic search)
114	- Tavily MCP (web search)
115	- Platform-specific search (PhilPapers, arXiv)
116
117	Quality Validation:
118	After search, I'll run `scripts/evaluate_samples.py` to generate

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type

strategist

1.1kstars116forks

View on GitHub

How to install strategist?

lishix520/academic-paper-skills/strategist

$npx -y skills add lishix520/academic-paper-skills --skill strategist

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# Academic Paper Strategist
2
3	## Overview
4
5	This skill provides a systematic framework for strategic planning of academic papers in philosophy and interdisciplinary research. It guides you through three phases—from platform selection to optimized outline—with AI-driven literature search, research gap identification, originality assessment, and quality-controlled outline design.
6
7	Output: A detailed, review-ready paper outline with supporting documentation (platform style guide, literature review, gap analysis, reviewer assessment).
8
9	Companion Skill: Use academic-paper-composer to execute the outline and write the full paper.
10
11	---
12
13	## When to Use This Skill
14
15	Use academic-paper-strategist when you need to:
16
17	Planning Stage:
18	- Design a research paper from initial idea to structured outline
19	- Identify a suitable publication platform (PhilArchive, arXiv, etc.)
20	- Understand writing standards for a specific preprint platform
21
22	Research Stage:
23	- Conduct systematic literature search
24	- Identify research gaps with evidence
25	- Assess originality of your research idea
26	- Predict potential impact
27
28	Design Stage:
29	- Structure paper chapters and arguments
30	- Optimize outline from reviewer perspective
31	- Prepare submission-ready strategy
32
33	Triggers:
34	- "Plan a paper on [topic]"
35	- "Help me design a paper about [subject]"
36	- "Identify research gaps in [field]"
37	- "Is this idea original?"
38	- "What platform should I submit to?"
39
40	---
41
42	## Workflow Overview
43
44	```
45	Phase 1: PLATFORM ANALYSIS (Target Selection + Style Learning)
46	↓
47	Phase 2: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK (AI-Driven Gap Identification)
48	↓
49	Phase 3: OUTLINE OPTIMIZATION (Quality-Controlled Design)
50	↓
51	Output: Detailed Outline + Supporting Documentation
52	```
53
54	Quality Gates: 3 validation checkpoints ensure each phase meets standards before proceeding.
55
56	---
57
58	## Phase 1: Platform Analysis
59
60	### Goal
61	Identify the optimal submission platform and understand its writing standards through systematic sample paper analysis.
62
63	### Input Required from User
64	- Core research idea or topic (brief description)
65	- Target platform (optional - if unclear, I'll recommend)
66	- Field/discipline (philosophy, cognitive science, interdisciplinary, etc.)
67
68	### Workflow
69
70	#### Step 1.1: Platform Selection (If Needed)
71
72	If target platform unclear, I will:
73
74	1. List candidate platforms based on research content:
75	- PhilArchive/PhilPapers: Philosophy papers, phenomenology, metaphysics
76	- arXiv (cs.AI, q-bio.NC): Computational, neuroscience, AI-related
77	- PhilSci-Archive: Philosophy of science, formal methods
78	- PsyArXiv: Psychology, cognitive science
79	- SocArXiv: Social sciences, interdisciplinary
80
81	2. Evaluate each platform:
82	- Subject area alignment (does your topic fit?)
83	- Methodology match (philosophical/empirical/computational)
84	- Acceptance criteria
85	- Typical review timeline
86
87	3. Provide recommendation with reasoning
88
89	4. Decision Point 1: You confirm platform or suggest alternative
90
91	#### Step 1.2: Sample Paper Search (AI-Driven, Quality-Controlled)
92
93	I will conduct multi-dimensional search for 8-10 representative papers:
94
95	Search Strategy (load `references/search_strategy.md` for details):
96
97	Time Dimension:
98	- Recent (last 6 months): 3 papers - capture current trends
99	- Current (1-2 years): 3 papers - established standards
100	- Classic (highly cited): 2 papers - quality benchmarks
101
102	Relevance Dimension:
103	- Use keyword combinations from your topic
104	- Score each paper 0-10 for relevance
105	- Retain only papers scoring ≥7/10
106
107	Diversity Dimension:
108	- Multiple authors (≥5 unique)
109	- Different research perspectives
110	- Varied paper lengths
111
112	Tools Used:
113	- Exa MCP (semantic search)
114	- Tavily MCP (web search)
115	- Platform-specific search (PhilPapers, arXiv)
116
117	Quality Validation:
118	After search, I'll run `scripts/evaluate_samples.py` to generate

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type