$npx -y skills add luwill/research-skills --skill research-proposalUse when the user asks to write or draft a PhD / doctoral research proposal, research plan, 研究计划书, or 开题报告 — a forward-looking plan of background, gap, research questions, methodology, timeline, and significance, in English or Chinese. Triggers: "write a research proposal", "PhD
| 1 | # Research Proposal Generator |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Generate a forward-looking academic research proposal — a plan for research not yet done — following flagship academic writing conventions, in English or Chinese. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | This skill produces the **first draft correctly**, not a template to be fixed later. Its single most important discipline is citation integrity: a proposal with a fabricated reference is an academic-integrity problem, not a style problem. Read [references/CITATION_INTEGRITY.md](references/CITATION_INTEGRITY.md) before Phase 2. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | ## Core Principles |
| 8 | |
| 9 | **Prose first.** Proposals read as flowing, connected paragraphs — not bulleted lists. Reserve lists for a focused set of research questions/objectives (2–4 items) and timeline milestones. Never enumerate contributions, methodology, background, or significance as bullets; narrate them. Full rules and examples: [references/WRITING_STYLE_GUIDE.md](references/WRITING_STYLE_GUIDE.md). |
| 10 | |
| 11 | **Every citation verified before it is committed.** Reference count follows the argument, never a quota — there is no minimum. A PhD proposal typically cites 25–50 sources (humanities often more); a tightly argued 25 beats a padded 45. Every reference must exist (DOI/PMID/arXiv resolves, or Zotero metadata), with author and year matching the source, before it enters the proposal. Unverifiable references are flagged `[UNVERIFIED]` and disclosed — never fabricated. See [references/CITATION_INTEGRITY.md](references/CITATION_INTEGRITY.md). |
| 12 | |
| 13 | **Write with verification, not one-shot.** Draft section by section; verify each section's citations before moving to the next (Phase 4). Do not generate a full multi-section proposal with dozens of citations in a single pass — that is the structural cause of hallucinated references. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | **Hedge to the evidence.** Use tentative language ("aims to", "may", "is expected to") for proposed work and uncertain claims; state well-established facts plainly. Do not over-claim ("will prove", "revolutionize"). |
| 16 | |
| 17 | **Avoid the LLM tells.** These phrases are AI-detector signatures — strip them: "Over the past decade, X has emerged as…", "In recent years,", "It is worth noting that", "plays a crucial/pivotal role", "has garnered significant attention", "delves into", "a testament to". Write specific openings grounded in the actual field instead of generic scene-setting. |
| 18 | |
| 19 | ## Scenario Routing |
| 20 | |
| 21 | The default structure below targets **PhD/doctoral proposals and academic research plans** (Abstract → Introduction → Literature Review → Methodology → Timeline → Significance). Confirm the scenario in Phase 1 and adapt: |
| 22 | |
| 23 | | Request | Structure | |
| 24 | |---|---| |
| 25 | | PhD/doctoral proposal, research plan, 研究计划书 | Default structure (this skill) | |
| 26 | | 开题报告 (thesis proposal / defense) | Default structure, but weight Literature Review and feasibility/existing-basis more heavily; keep methodology concrete | |
| 27 | | Humanities dissertation proposal | Default + a **Chapter Outline** section (see [references/DOMAIN_TEMPLATES.md](references/DOMAIN_TEMPLATES.md)) | |
| 28 | | 基金申请书 / 国自然 / NSF grant | **Different structure** (立项依据 / 研究内容与目标 / 研究方案与可行性 / 研究基础与工作条件 / 经费预算). Tell the user the default 5-section template is not a grant form; adapt headings to the funder's required template and confirm with the user before writing | |
| 29 | |
| 30 | --- |
| 31 | |
| 32 | ## Phase 1: Requirements Gathering |
| 33 | |
| 34 | Use `AskUserQuestion` to collect: |
| 35 | |
| 36 | - **Research topic / question** — core problem to investigate. |
| 37 | - **Scenario** — PhD proposal / 开题报告 / research plan / grant (routes structure, see above). |
| 38 | - **Academic domain** — STEM (and whether computational/ML — see [references/DOMAIN_TEMPLATES.md](references/DOMAIN_TEMPLATES.md)), Humanities, or Social Sciences. |
| 39 | - **Output language** — English or 中文. |
| 40 | - **Target word count** — default ~3,000 words; range 2,000–4,000 (humanities may extend to ~10,000). |
| 41 | - **Optional** — target institution/supervisor; existing materials or a Zotero library to draw on. |
| 42 | |
| 43 | If the topic is too vague to scope a methodology, ask focused clarifying questions befo |