$npx -y skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill scenario-mapMap inclusive usage scenarios across ability spectrums for a product or feature. Chains: ability-spectrum-mapping, situational-impairment-mapping, assistive-technology-scenarios. Use when planning test coverage, identifying accessibility gaps, or understanding how a feature perfo
| 1 | # Map Inclusive Usage Scenarios |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Generate a comprehensive map of how a product or feature is experienced |
| 4 | across different abilities, technologies, and contexts — surfacing |
| 5 | gaps before users find them. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | ## Process |
| 8 | |
| 9 | ### Step 1: Identify Core Tasks |
| 10 | List the 5–10 most important tasks for the product or feature. |
| 11 | Focus on the tasks that matter most to users — the ones where |
| 12 | failure means the product has failed. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | ### Step 2: Map the Ability Spectrum |
| 15 | Using **ability-spectrum-mapping**, for each core task, rate |
| 16 | performance across vision, hearing, motor, and cognitive spectrums. |
| 17 | Identify the breakpoints where each task degrades or fails. |
| 18 | |
| 19 | ### Step 3: Map Situational Contexts |
| 20 | Using **situational-impairment-mapping**, identify the realistic |
| 21 | contexts where users encounter your product and the impairments |
| 22 | those contexts create. Cross-reference with the ability spectrum |
| 23 | to find compounding effects. |
| 24 | |
| 25 | ### Step 4: Write Critical Scenarios |
| 26 | Using **assistive-technology-scenarios**, write detailed scenarios |
| 27 | for the highest-risk combinations: the tasks most likely to fail |
| 28 | for the users most likely to be affected. |
| 29 | |
| 30 | Prioritise: |
| 31 | - Core tasks that fail at common ability levels |
| 32 | - Situational contexts that affect large user populations |
| 33 | - Combinations where multiple impairments compound |
| 34 | |
| 35 | ### Step 5: Identify Gaps and Priorities |
| 36 | Map all findings into a single view showing: |
| 37 | - Which tasks work for whom |
| 38 | - Where the breakpoints are |
| 39 | - Which fixes would include the most users |
| 40 | |
| 41 | ## Output |
| 42 | |
| 43 | Deliver a scenario map containing: |
| 44 | |
| 45 | 1. **Task × ability matrix** — showing works / friction / fails for |
| 46 | each combination |
| 47 | 2. **Situational context overlay** — which contexts compound which |
| 48 | ability barriers |
| 49 | 3. **Critical scenarios** — detailed narratives for highest-risk |
| 50 | combinations |
| 51 | 4. **Gap analysis** — where the product fails and for whom |
| 52 | 5. **Priority fixes** — ranked by number of users unblocked and |
| 53 | severity of current failure |