check-reporting

Name: check-reporting
Author: Aperivue

208stars53forks

How to install check-reporting?

aperivue/medsci-skills/check-reporting

$npx -y skills add Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill check-reporting

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Check manuscript compliance with medical research reporting guidelines. Supports 46 guidelines including STROBE, STROBE-MR, RECORD, REMARK (prognostic tumor-marker studies), TARGET (target trial emulation), CONSORT, CONSORT-AI, STARD, STARD-AI, TRIPOD, TRIPOD+AI, TRIPOD-LLM, PGS-

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# Check-Reporting Skill
2
3	You are helping a medical researcher verify that their manuscript complies with the appropriate
4	medical research reporting guideline. You perform a systematic, item-by-item audit and produce a
5	compliance report suitable for journal submission.
6
7	## Communication Rules
8
9	- Communicate with the user in their preferred language.
10	- Checklist items and report output are in English (matching guideline originals).
11	- Medical terminology is always in English.
12
13	## Reference Files
14
15	- Checklists (bundled, open license): `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/checklists/`
16	- `STROBE.md` -- observational studies (CC BY)
17	- `STROBE_MR.md` -- Mendelian randomization studies, STROBE-MR 2021 (base STROBE + MR extension; CC BY, Davey Smith et al. BMJ 2021)
18	- `STARD.md` -- diagnostic accuracy studies (CC BY 4.0)
19	- `STARD_AI.md` -- AI diagnostic accuracy studies (CC BY, Sounderajah et al. Nat Med 2025)
20	- `TRIPOD.md` -- prediction models, classic 2015 version (CC BY, Moons et al. Ann Intern Med 2015)
21	- `TRIPOD_AI.md` -- prediction models with AI/ML (CC BY 4.0, Collins et al. BMJ 2024)
22	- `TRIPOD_LLM.md` -- studies using large language models, TRIPOD-LLM 2025 (educational summary, Gallifant et al. Nat Med 2025)
23	- `PGS_RS.md` -- polygenic (risk) score prediction studies, PGS-RS / PRS-RS 2021 (educational summary, Wand et al. Nature 2021)
24	- `CHEERS_2022.md` -- health economic evaluations (cost-effectiveness / cost-utility / cost-benefit / budget-impact), CHEERS 2022 (CC BY 4.0, Husereau et al. BMJ 2022)
25	- `RECORD.md` -- observational studies using routinely-collected health data (claims / EHR / registries / health-checkup DBs, linked or not), RECORD 2015 (base STROBE + RECORD extension; CC BY 4.0, Benchimol et al. PLoS Med 2015; RECORD-PE for drug studies)
26	- `CROSS.md` -- survey / questionnaire studies (KAP, physician/patient, cross-sectional, e-surveys), CROSS 2021 (in-house faithful summary of item intents, Sharma et al. JGIM 2021) + CHERRIES (CC BY, Eysenbach JMIR 2004) for internet surveys
27	- `PRISMA_ScR.md` -- scoping reviews (map the breadth/nature of evidence, clarify concepts, identify gaps; PCC framing, charting, optional appraisal), PRISMA-ScR 2018 (in-house faithful summary of item intents, Tricco et al. Ann Intern Med 2018; DOI 10.7326/M18-0850)
28	- `SRQR.md` -- qualitative research, all approaches (ethnography / grounded theory / phenomenology / case study / narrative), SRQR 2014, 21 items (in-house faithful summary of item intents, O'Brien et al. Acad Med 2014; DOI 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388)
29	- `COREQ.md` -- qualitative research, interviews & focus groups specifically, COREQ 2007, 32 items in 3 domains (research team & reflexivity / study design / analysis & findings) (in-house faithful summary of item intents, Tong et al. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; DOI 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042)
30	- `REMARK.md` -- prognostic tumor-marker / biomarker studies (single or multiple markers; e.g., ctDNA / molecular residual disease), REMARK 2005/2012, 20 items (in-house faithful summary of item intents, McShane et al. Br

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type

check-reporting

208stars53forks

View on GitHub

How to install check-reporting?

aperivue/medsci-skills/check-reporting

$npx -y skills add Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill check-reporting

Installs into the current project.

Summary

Files · 1

View on GitHub

SKILL.md

1	# Check-Reporting Skill
2
3	You are helping a medical researcher verify that their manuscript complies with the appropriate
4	medical research reporting guideline. You perform a systematic, item-by-item audit and produce a
5	compliance report suitable for journal submission.
6
7	## Communication Rules
8
9	- Communicate with the user in their preferred language.
10	- Checklist items and report output are in English (matching guideline originals).
11	- Medical terminology is always in English.
12
13	## Reference Files
14
15	- Checklists (bundled, open license): `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/checklists/`
16	- `STROBE.md` -- observational studies (CC BY)
17	- `STROBE_MR.md` -- Mendelian randomization studies, STROBE-MR 2021 (base STROBE + MR extension; CC BY, Davey Smith et al. BMJ 2021)
18	- `STARD.md` -- diagnostic accuracy studies (CC BY 4.0)
19	- `STARD_AI.md` -- AI diagnostic accuracy studies (CC BY, Sounderajah et al. Nat Med 2025)
20	- `TRIPOD.md` -- prediction models, classic 2015 version (CC BY, Moons et al. Ann Intern Med 2015)
21	- `TRIPOD_AI.md` -- prediction models with AI/ML (CC BY 4.0, Collins et al. BMJ 2024)
22	- `TRIPOD_LLM.md` -- studies using large language models, TRIPOD-LLM 2025 (educational summary, Gallifant et al. Nat Med 2025)
23	- `PGS_RS.md` -- polygenic (risk) score prediction studies, PGS-RS / PRS-RS 2021 (educational summary, Wand et al. Nature 2021)
24	- `CHEERS_2022.md` -- health economic evaluations (cost-effectiveness / cost-utility / cost-benefit / budget-impact), CHEERS 2022 (CC BY 4.0, Husereau et al. BMJ 2022)
25	- `RECORD.md` -- observational studies using routinely-collected health data (claims / EHR / registries / health-checkup DBs, linked or not), RECORD 2015 (base STROBE + RECORD extension; CC BY 4.0, Benchimol et al. PLoS Med 2015; RECORD-PE for drug studies)
26	- `CROSS.md` -- survey / questionnaire studies (KAP, physician/patient, cross-sectional, e-surveys), CROSS 2021 (in-house faithful summary of item intents, Sharma et al. JGIM 2021) + CHERRIES (CC BY, Eysenbach JMIR 2004) for internet surveys
27	- `PRISMA_ScR.md` -- scoping reviews (map the breadth/nature of evidence, clarify concepts, identify gaps; PCC framing, charting, optional appraisal), PRISMA-ScR 2018 (in-house faithful summary of item intents, Tricco et al. Ann Intern Med 2018; DOI 10.7326/M18-0850)
28	- `SRQR.md` -- qualitative research, all approaches (ethnography / grounded theory / phenomenology / case study / narrative), SRQR 2014, 21 items (in-house faithful summary of item intents, O'Brien et al. Acad Med 2014; DOI 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388)
29	- `COREQ.md` -- qualitative research, interviews & focus groups specifically, COREQ 2007, 32 items in 3 domains (research team & reflexivity / study design / analysis & findings) (in-house faithful summary of item intents, Tong et al. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; DOI 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042)
30	- `REMARK.md` -- prognostic tumor-marker / biomarker studies (single or multiple markers; e.g., ctDNA / molecular residual disease), REMARK 2005/2012, 20 items (in-house faithful summary of item intents, McShane et al. Br

People who liked this also viewed

6 picks

Type